TY - JOUR
T1 - Trimetrexate in the treatment of recurrent or advanced leiomyosarcoma of the uterus
T2 - A phase II study of the gynecologic oncology group
AU - Smith, Harriet O.
AU - Blessing, John A.
AU - Vaccarello, Luis
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by National Cancer Institute grants of the Gynecologic Oncology Group Administrative Office (CA 27469) and the Gyneco- logic Oncology Group Statistical Office (CA 37517). The following Gynecologic Oncology Group institutions participated in this study: University of Alabama at Birmingham, Abington Memorial Hospital, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Indiana University Medical Center, The Albany Medical College of Union University, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Eastern Virginia Medical School, The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Columbus Cancer Council, University of Virginia Health Science Center, Tacoma General Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Tampa Bay Cancer Consortium and North Shore University Hospital, Carolina Gynecologic Oncology.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Objective. This study was conducted to determine the objective response of trimetrexate in patients with advanced or recurrent leiomyosarcoma of the uterus. Methods. Eligibility was restricted to patients with measurable disease who had received no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen, who had adequate bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function, and who had recovered from previous therapy. Trimetrexate was begun at 5 mg/m2/day orally for 5 days every other week, with dose modifications specified by study design. Results. Of 28 patients entered into the study, 27 were evaluable for toxicity and 23 for response. Prior therapy included radiation (7 patients) and/or chemotherapy (10 patients). Measurable disease was extrapelvic in 20 cases and confined to the pelvis in 3. The overall response rate was 4.3%; there were no complete responses and 1 partial response. Toxicities were mild to moderate with no treatment-related deaths. Hematological toxicity was most common, consisting of leukopenia (grade 1 to 2, 8 patients; grade 3 or 4, 2 patients), thrombocytopenia (grade 1 to 2, 10 patients; grade 3 or 4, 1 patient), and anemia (grade 1 to 2, 6 patients; grade 3 or 4, 4 patients. Severe (grade 3 or 4) nonhematologic toxicity was uncommon: nausea/vomiting/gastrointestinal (3 patients) and neurological (1 patient). Progression-free and overall survival, in months, was 2.2 (range: 0.9-13.4) and 7.2+ (range: 1.0-13.4+), respectively. Conclusion. Although toxicity is acceptable, trimetrexate at this dose and schedule is ineffective therapy for patients with recurrent leiomyosarcoma. Further development of this specific regimen for this indication is unwarranted.
AB - Objective. This study was conducted to determine the objective response of trimetrexate in patients with advanced or recurrent leiomyosarcoma of the uterus. Methods. Eligibility was restricted to patients with measurable disease who had received no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen, who had adequate bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function, and who had recovered from previous therapy. Trimetrexate was begun at 5 mg/m2/day orally for 5 days every other week, with dose modifications specified by study design. Results. Of 28 patients entered into the study, 27 were evaluable for toxicity and 23 for response. Prior therapy included radiation (7 patients) and/or chemotherapy (10 patients). Measurable disease was extrapelvic in 20 cases and confined to the pelvis in 3. The overall response rate was 4.3%; there were no complete responses and 1 partial response. Toxicities were mild to moderate with no treatment-related deaths. Hematological toxicity was most common, consisting of leukopenia (grade 1 to 2, 8 patients; grade 3 or 4, 2 patients), thrombocytopenia (grade 1 to 2, 10 patients; grade 3 or 4, 1 patient), and anemia (grade 1 to 2, 6 patients; grade 3 or 4, 4 patients. Severe (grade 3 or 4) nonhematologic toxicity was uncommon: nausea/vomiting/gastrointestinal (3 patients) and neurological (1 patient). Progression-free and overall survival, in months, was 2.2 (range: 0.9-13.4) and 7.2+ (range: 1.0-13.4+), respectively. Conclusion. Although toxicity is acceptable, trimetrexate at this dose and schedule is ineffective therapy for patients with recurrent leiomyosarcoma. Further development of this specific regimen for this indication is unwarranted.
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Leiomyosarcoma
KW - Trimetrexate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036142732&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036142732&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/gyno.2001.6482
DO - 10.1006/gyno.2001.6482
M3 - Article
C2 - 11748990
AN - SCOPUS:0036142732
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 84
SP - 140
EP - 144
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
IS - 1
ER -