Triage of the pediatric patient in the emergency department

Are we all in agreement?

Theresa Maldonado, Jeffrey R. Avner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To compare triage categorization as a measure of perceived patient acuity on presentation to the emergency department by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) attending physicians, nurses, and pediatric residents with their general emergency medicine (GEM) counterparts. Methods. A questionnaire that contained 12 pediatric triage scenarios was sent to all PEM attending physicians, triage-trained nurses, and pediatric residents and their GEM counterparts at a large urban hospital with separate pediatric and general emergency departments. Participants were asked to use a 3-tier triage system (emergent, urgent, nonurgent) to assign a triage level for each patient scenario. Results. The response rate was 99%. The κ level of agreement was highest (.39) among the PEM physicians. Significantly more GEM attending physicians triaged the following scenarios at a higher acuity level as compared with PEM attending physicians with a trend toward emergent triage: simple febrile seizure, 50% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30%-70%) versus 7.7% (95% CI: 1%-34%); 18-month-old with fever and bumps on lips, 21% (95% CI: 9%-43%) versus 0% (95% CI: 0%-23%); and 15-month-old well-appearing child with high fever, 50% (95% CI: 30%-70%) versus 7.7% (95% CI: 1%-34%). Significant differences were found between GEM and PEM triage-trained nurses only in the 15-month-old high fever scenario and between GEM and pediatric residents in the 15-month-old high fever scenario, the 18-month-old with fever and bumps on lips scenario, and a fever/limp scenario. Conclusions. The level of agreement of triage assignment within each group was only fair. GEM participants and PEM participants agreed on most scenarios. However, GEM participants were more likely to triage children with certain febrile illnesses at higher acuity levels as compared with their PEM counterparts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)356-360
Number of pages5
JournalPediatrics
Volume114
Issue number2 I
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2004

Fingerprint

Triage
Hospital Emergency Service
Emergency Medicine
Pediatrics
Fever
Confidence Intervals
Physicians
Lip
Patient Acuity
Febrile Seizures
Pediatric Emergency Medicine
Urban Hospitals
Nurses

Keywords

  • Child
  • Emergency
  • Fever
  • Triage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Triage of the pediatric patient in the emergency department : Are we all in agreement? / Maldonado, Theresa; Avner, Jeffrey R.

In: Pediatrics, Vol. 114, No. 2 I, 08.2004, p. 356-360.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Maldonado, Theresa ; Avner, Jeffrey R. / Triage of the pediatric patient in the emergency department : Are we all in agreement?. In: Pediatrics. 2004 ; Vol. 114, No. 2 I. pp. 356-360.
@article{819b1a74707e4a3fae75e8ea9fc8f5cf,
title = "Triage of the pediatric patient in the emergency department: Are we all in agreement?",
abstract = "Objective. To compare triage categorization as a measure of perceived patient acuity on presentation to the emergency department by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) attending physicians, nurses, and pediatric residents with their general emergency medicine (GEM) counterparts. Methods. A questionnaire that contained 12 pediatric triage scenarios was sent to all PEM attending physicians, triage-trained nurses, and pediatric residents and their GEM counterparts at a large urban hospital with separate pediatric and general emergency departments. Participants were asked to use a 3-tier triage system (emergent, urgent, nonurgent) to assign a triage level for each patient scenario. Results. The response rate was 99{\%}. The κ level of agreement was highest (.39) among the PEM physicians. Significantly more GEM attending physicians triaged the following scenarios at a higher acuity level as compared with PEM attending physicians with a trend toward emergent triage: simple febrile seizure, 50{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval [CI]: 30{\%}-70{\%}) versus 7.7{\%} (95{\%} CI: 1{\%}-34{\%}); 18-month-old with fever and bumps on lips, 21{\%} (95{\%} CI: 9{\%}-43{\%}) versus 0{\%} (95{\%} CI: 0{\%}-23{\%}); and 15-month-old well-appearing child with high fever, 50{\%} (95{\%} CI: 30{\%}-70{\%}) versus 7.7{\%} (95{\%} CI: 1{\%}-34{\%}). Significant differences were found between GEM and PEM triage-trained nurses only in the 15-month-old high fever scenario and between GEM and pediatric residents in the 15-month-old high fever scenario, the 18-month-old with fever and bumps on lips scenario, and a fever/limp scenario. Conclusions. The level of agreement of triage assignment within each group was only fair. GEM participants and PEM participants agreed on most scenarios. However, GEM participants were more likely to triage children with certain febrile illnesses at higher acuity levels as compared with their PEM counterparts.",
keywords = "Child, Emergency, Fever, Triage",
author = "Theresa Maldonado and Avner, {Jeffrey R.}",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1542/peds.114.2.356",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "114",
pages = "356--360",
journal = "Pediatrics",
issn = "0031-4005",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "2 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Triage of the pediatric patient in the emergency department

T2 - Are we all in agreement?

AU - Maldonado, Theresa

AU - Avner, Jeffrey R.

PY - 2004/8

Y1 - 2004/8

N2 - Objective. To compare triage categorization as a measure of perceived patient acuity on presentation to the emergency department by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) attending physicians, nurses, and pediatric residents with their general emergency medicine (GEM) counterparts. Methods. A questionnaire that contained 12 pediatric triage scenarios was sent to all PEM attending physicians, triage-trained nurses, and pediatric residents and their GEM counterparts at a large urban hospital with separate pediatric and general emergency departments. Participants were asked to use a 3-tier triage system (emergent, urgent, nonurgent) to assign a triage level for each patient scenario. Results. The response rate was 99%. The κ level of agreement was highest (.39) among the PEM physicians. Significantly more GEM attending physicians triaged the following scenarios at a higher acuity level as compared with PEM attending physicians with a trend toward emergent triage: simple febrile seizure, 50% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30%-70%) versus 7.7% (95% CI: 1%-34%); 18-month-old with fever and bumps on lips, 21% (95% CI: 9%-43%) versus 0% (95% CI: 0%-23%); and 15-month-old well-appearing child with high fever, 50% (95% CI: 30%-70%) versus 7.7% (95% CI: 1%-34%). Significant differences were found between GEM and PEM triage-trained nurses only in the 15-month-old high fever scenario and between GEM and pediatric residents in the 15-month-old high fever scenario, the 18-month-old with fever and bumps on lips scenario, and a fever/limp scenario. Conclusions. The level of agreement of triage assignment within each group was only fair. GEM participants and PEM participants agreed on most scenarios. However, GEM participants were more likely to triage children with certain febrile illnesses at higher acuity levels as compared with their PEM counterparts.

AB - Objective. To compare triage categorization as a measure of perceived patient acuity on presentation to the emergency department by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) attending physicians, nurses, and pediatric residents with their general emergency medicine (GEM) counterparts. Methods. A questionnaire that contained 12 pediatric triage scenarios was sent to all PEM attending physicians, triage-trained nurses, and pediatric residents and their GEM counterparts at a large urban hospital with separate pediatric and general emergency departments. Participants were asked to use a 3-tier triage system (emergent, urgent, nonurgent) to assign a triage level for each patient scenario. Results. The response rate was 99%. The κ level of agreement was highest (.39) among the PEM physicians. Significantly more GEM attending physicians triaged the following scenarios at a higher acuity level as compared with PEM attending physicians with a trend toward emergent triage: simple febrile seizure, 50% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30%-70%) versus 7.7% (95% CI: 1%-34%); 18-month-old with fever and bumps on lips, 21% (95% CI: 9%-43%) versus 0% (95% CI: 0%-23%); and 15-month-old well-appearing child with high fever, 50% (95% CI: 30%-70%) versus 7.7% (95% CI: 1%-34%). Significant differences were found between GEM and PEM triage-trained nurses only in the 15-month-old high fever scenario and between GEM and pediatric residents in the 15-month-old high fever scenario, the 18-month-old with fever and bumps on lips scenario, and a fever/limp scenario. Conclusions. The level of agreement of triage assignment within each group was only fair. GEM participants and PEM participants agreed on most scenarios. However, GEM participants were more likely to triage children with certain febrile illnesses at higher acuity levels as compared with their PEM counterparts.

KW - Child

KW - Emergency

KW - Fever

KW - Triage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3442898743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3442898743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/peds.114.2.356

DO - 10.1542/peds.114.2.356

M3 - Article

VL - 114

SP - 356

EP - 360

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

SN - 0031-4005

IS - 2 I

ER -