Trends and inequalities in the surgical management of ureteric calculi in the USA

Stephan Seklehner, Melissa A. Laudano, Asha Jamzadeh, Joseph J. Del Pizzo, Bilal Chughtai, Richard K. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To assess trends in the surgical management of ureteric calculi over a 10-year period. Materials and Methods An analysis of the 5% Medicare Public Use Files, from 2001, 2004, 2007 and 2010, was performed to assess the use of ureteroscopy (URS), extracorporal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureterolithotomy (UL) in treating ureteric calculi. Patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases 9th edition (Clinical Modification) and Current Procedure Terminology codes. Statistical analyses using the Fisher and chi-squared tests, and multivariate logistic regression analysis (dependent variables: URS, ESWL, UL, treatment, no treatment; independent variables: age, gender, ethnicity, geography and year of treatment) were performed. Results A total of 299 920 patients with ureteric calculi were identified. Of these, 115 200 underwent surgery. Men (odds ratio [OR] = 1.15, P < 0.001) were more likely, while patients from ethnic minorities (OR = 0.84, P = 0.004) were less likely to be treated. Patients in the West of the USA were also less likely to be treated (OR = 0.76, P < 0.001) as were patients aged <65 or >84 years old (P = 0.29). The predominant surgical approach was URS (65.2%), followed by ESWL (33.6%) and UL (1.2%). The use of URS increased over time, while the use of ESWL and UL declined. Women (OR = 1.25, P < 0.001) were more likely to undergo URS. Patients in the South of the USA (OR = 1.51, P < 0.001) and patients from ethnic minorities were more likely to undergo ESWL (OR = 1.23, P = 0.03). Conclusions The surgical treatment of ureteric calculi changed significantly between 2001 and 2010. The use of URS expanded at the expense of ESWL and UL. Multiple inequalities existed in overall surgical treatment rates and in the choice of treatment; age, gender, ethnicity and geography influenced both whether patients underwent surgical intervention and the type of surgical approach used.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)476-483
Number of pages8
JournalBJU International
Volume113
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ureteroscopy
Lithotripsy
Calculi
Odds Ratio
Geography
Therapeutics
International Classification of Diseases
Medicare
Terminology
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • lithotripsy
  • minimally invasive
  • surgical procedures
  • ureteric calculi
  • ureteroscopy
  • urolithiasis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Seklehner, S., Laudano, M. A., Jamzadeh, A., Del Pizzo, J. J., Chughtai, B., & Lee, R. K. (2014). Trends and inequalities in the surgical management of ureteric calculi in the USA. BJU International, 113(3), 476-483. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12372

Trends and inequalities in the surgical management of ureteric calculi in the USA. / Seklehner, Stephan; Laudano, Melissa A.; Jamzadeh, Asha; Del Pizzo, Joseph J.; Chughtai, Bilal; Lee, Richard K.

In: BJU International, Vol. 113, No. 3, 01.01.2014, p. 476-483.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Seklehner, S, Laudano, MA, Jamzadeh, A, Del Pizzo, JJ, Chughtai, B & Lee, RK 2014, 'Trends and inequalities in the surgical management of ureteric calculi in the USA', BJU International, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 476-483. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12372
Seklehner, Stephan ; Laudano, Melissa A. ; Jamzadeh, Asha ; Del Pizzo, Joseph J. ; Chughtai, Bilal ; Lee, Richard K. / Trends and inequalities in the surgical management of ureteric calculi in the USA. In: BJU International. 2014 ; Vol. 113, No. 3. pp. 476-483.
@article{f2ba0cb3e5e447fea7e6dc39f03ac119,
title = "Trends and inequalities in the surgical management of ureteric calculi in the USA",
abstract = "Objective To assess trends in the surgical management of ureteric calculi over a 10-year period. Materials and Methods An analysis of the 5{\%} Medicare Public Use Files, from 2001, 2004, 2007 and 2010, was performed to assess the use of ureteroscopy (URS), extracorporal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureterolithotomy (UL) in treating ureteric calculi. Patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases 9th edition (Clinical Modification) and Current Procedure Terminology codes. Statistical analyses using the Fisher and chi-squared tests, and multivariate logistic regression analysis (dependent variables: URS, ESWL, UL, treatment, no treatment; independent variables: age, gender, ethnicity, geography and year of treatment) were performed. Results A total of 299 920 patients with ureteric calculi were identified. Of these, 115 200 underwent surgery. Men (odds ratio [OR] = 1.15, P < 0.001) were more likely, while patients from ethnic minorities (OR = 0.84, P = 0.004) were less likely to be treated. Patients in the West of the USA were also less likely to be treated (OR = 0.76, P < 0.001) as were patients aged <65 or >84 years old (P = 0.29). The predominant surgical approach was URS (65.2{\%}), followed by ESWL (33.6{\%}) and UL (1.2{\%}). The use of URS increased over time, while the use of ESWL and UL declined. Women (OR = 1.25, P < 0.001) were more likely to undergo URS. Patients in the South of the USA (OR = 1.51, P < 0.001) and patients from ethnic minorities were more likely to undergo ESWL (OR = 1.23, P = 0.03). Conclusions The surgical treatment of ureteric calculi changed significantly between 2001 and 2010. The use of URS expanded at the expense of ESWL and UL. Multiple inequalities existed in overall surgical treatment rates and in the choice of treatment; age, gender, ethnicity and geography influenced both whether patients underwent surgical intervention and the type of surgical approach used.",
keywords = "lithotripsy, minimally invasive, surgical procedures, ureteric calculi, ureteroscopy, urolithiasis",
author = "Stephan Seklehner and Laudano, {Melissa A.} and Asha Jamzadeh and {Del Pizzo}, {Joseph J.} and Bilal Chughtai and Lee, {Richard K.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/bju.12372",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
pages = "476--483",
journal = "BJU International",
issn = "1464-4096",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trends and inequalities in the surgical management of ureteric calculi in the USA

AU - Seklehner, Stephan

AU - Laudano, Melissa A.

AU - Jamzadeh, Asha

AU - Del Pizzo, Joseph J.

AU - Chughtai, Bilal

AU - Lee, Richard K.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Objective To assess trends in the surgical management of ureteric calculi over a 10-year period. Materials and Methods An analysis of the 5% Medicare Public Use Files, from 2001, 2004, 2007 and 2010, was performed to assess the use of ureteroscopy (URS), extracorporal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureterolithotomy (UL) in treating ureteric calculi. Patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases 9th edition (Clinical Modification) and Current Procedure Terminology codes. Statistical analyses using the Fisher and chi-squared tests, and multivariate logistic regression analysis (dependent variables: URS, ESWL, UL, treatment, no treatment; independent variables: age, gender, ethnicity, geography and year of treatment) were performed. Results A total of 299 920 patients with ureteric calculi were identified. Of these, 115 200 underwent surgery. Men (odds ratio [OR] = 1.15, P < 0.001) were more likely, while patients from ethnic minorities (OR = 0.84, P = 0.004) were less likely to be treated. Patients in the West of the USA were also less likely to be treated (OR = 0.76, P < 0.001) as were patients aged <65 or >84 years old (P = 0.29). The predominant surgical approach was URS (65.2%), followed by ESWL (33.6%) and UL (1.2%). The use of URS increased over time, while the use of ESWL and UL declined. Women (OR = 1.25, P < 0.001) were more likely to undergo URS. Patients in the South of the USA (OR = 1.51, P < 0.001) and patients from ethnic minorities were more likely to undergo ESWL (OR = 1.23, P = 0.03). Conclusions The surgical treatment of ureteric calculi changed significantly between 2001 and 2010. The use of URS expanded at the expense of ESWL and UL. Multiple inequalities existed in overall surgical treatment rates and in the choice of treatment; age, gender, ethnicity and geography influenced both whether patients underwent surgical intervention and the type of surgical approach used.

AB - Objective To assess trends in the surgical management of ureteric calculi over a 10-year period. Materials and Methods An analysis of the 5% Medicare Public Use Files, from 2001, 2004, 2007 and 2010, was performed to assess the use of ureteroscopy (URS), extracorporal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureterolithotomy (UL) in treating ureteric calculi. Patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases 9th edition (Clinical Modification) and Current Procedure Terminology codes. Statistical analyses using the Fisher and chi-squared tests, and multivariate logistic regression analysis (dependent variables: URS, ESWL, UL, treatment, no treatment; independent variables: age, gender, ethnicity, geography and year of treatment) were performed. Results A total of 299 920 patients with ureteric calculi were identified. Of these, 115 200 underwent surgery. Men (odds ratio [OR] = 1.15, P < 0.001) were more likely, while patients from ethnic minorities (OR = 0.84, P = 0.004) were less likely to be treated. Patients in the West of the USA were also less likely to be treated (OR = 0.76, P < 0.001) as were patients aged <65 or >84 years old (P = 0.29). The predominant surgical approach was URS (65.2%), followed by ESWL (33.6%) and UL (1.2%). The use of URS increased over time, while the use of ESWL and UL declined. Women (OR = 1.25, P < 0.001) were more likely to undergo URS. Patients in the South of the USA (OR = 1.51, P < 0.001) and patients from ethnic minorities were more likely to undergo ESWL (OR = 1.23, P = 0.03). Conclusions The surgical treatment of ureteric calculi changed significantly between 2001 and 2010. The use of URS expanded at the expense of ESWL and UL. Multiple inequalities existed in overall surgical treatment rates and in the choice of treatment; age, gender, ethnicity and geography influenced both whether patients underwent surgical intervention and the type of surgical approach used.

KW - lithotripsy

KW - minimally invasive

KW - surgical procedures

KW - ureteric calculi

KW - ureteroscopy

KW - urolithiasis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896710928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896710928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/bju.12372

DO - 10.1111/bju.12372

M3 - Article

C2 - 24053734

AN - SCOPUS:84896710928

VL - 113

SP - 476

EP - 483

JO - BJU International

JF - BJU International

SN - 1464-4096

IS - 3

ER -