Treatment options for the closure of secundum atrial septal defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Pedro A. Villablanca, David A. Briston, Josep Rodés-Cabau, David F. Briceno, Gaurav Rao, Mohammed Aljoudi, Aman M. Shah, Divyanshu Mohananey, Tanush Gupta, Mohammed Makkiya, Harish Ramakrishna, Mario J. Garcia, Robert H. Pass, Giles J. Peek, Ali N. Zaidi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Secundum atrial septal defects (ASDs) are treated by surgical closure (SC) or transcatheter device closure (TCC). Due to a scarcity of data directly comparing these approaches, it remains unclear which is superior. This meta-analysis compares the clinical outcomes of the two treatment options. Methods A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Google Search, and Cochrane databases for studies directly comparing SC and TCC of ASDs. Outcomes studied were major and minor acute complications, all-cause mortality, residual shunt, reinterventions, and length of stay (LOS). Relative risk (RR), difference in mean (DM) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method with a fixed effect model. In cases of heterogeneity (defined as I2 > 25%), random effect models were used. Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses were performed for each outcome. Results Of the 1742 manuscripts screened, 26 observational studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria (total n = 14,559 patients). TCC was superior to SC for the following outcomes: all-cause mortality (RR, 0.66; 95% CI 0.64–0.99), total complications (RR, 0.48; 95% CI 0.35–0.65), major complications (RR, 0.57; 95% CI 0.40–0.81), minor complications (RR, 0.35; 95% CI 0.23–0.53), and LOS (DM, − 2.92; 95% CI − 3.25 to (− 2.58)). Residual shunts were more common with TCC (RR, 3.35; 95% CI 1.72–6.51). No difference was observed regarding the need of reintervention (RR, 1.45; 95% CI 0.60–3.51). Meta-regression analysis showed that older age increases the risk of death and complications in patients undergoing TCC. Conclusions Though both approaches are effective, TCC is associated with lower mortality, complications, and LOS while SC has a lower rate of residual shunting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149-155
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume241
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 2017

Fingerprint

Atrial Heart Septal Defects
Meta-Analysis
Confidence Intervals
Equipment and Supplies
Length of Stay
Therapeutics
Mortality
Regression Analysis
Manuscripts
PubMed
MEDLINE
Observational Studies
Databases

Keywords

  • Atrial septal defect
  • Meta-analysis
  • Surgery
  • Transcatheter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Villablanca, P. A., Briston, D. A., Rodés-Cabau, J., Briceno, D. F., Rao, G., Aljoudi, M., ... Zaidi, A. N. (2017). Treatment options for the closure of secundum atrial septal defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Cardiology, 241, 149-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.073

Treatment options for the closure of secundum atrial septal defects : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Villablanca, Pedro A.; Briston, David A.; Rodés-Cabau, Josep; Briceno, David F.; Rao, Gaurav; Aljoudi, Mohammed; Shah, Aman M.; Mohananey, Divyanshu; Gupta, Tanush; Makkiya, Mohammed; Ramakrishna, Harish; Garcia, Mario J.; Pass, Robert H.; Peek, Giles J.; Zaidi, Ali N.

In: International Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 241, 15.08.2017, p. 149-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Villablanca, PA, Briston, DA, Rodés-Cabau, J, Briceno, DF, Rao, G, Aljoudi, M, Shah, AM, Mohananey, D, Gupta, T, Makkiya, M, Ramakrishna, H, Garcia, MJ, Pass, RH, Peek, GJ & Zaidi, AN 2017, 'Treatment options for the closure of secundum atrial septal defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis', International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 241, pp. 149-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.073
Villablanca, Pedro A. ; Briston, David A. ; Rodés-Cabau, Josep ; Briceno, David F. ; Rao, Gaurav ; Aljoudi, Mohammed ; Shah, Aman M. ; Mohananey, Divyanshu ; Gupta, Tanush ; Makkiya, Mohammed ; Ramakrishna, Harish ; Garcia, Mario J. ; Pass, Robert H. ; Peek, Giles J. ; Zaidi, Ali N. / Treatment options for the closure of secundum atrial septal defects : A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: International Journal of Cardiology. 2017 ; Vol. 241. pp. 149-155.
@article{58cef30732cd49cd8d975fea297a15f3,
title = "Treatment options for the closure of secundum atrial septal defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background Secundum atrial septal defects (ASDs) are treated by surgical closure (SC) or transcatheter device closure (TCC). Due to a scarcity of data directly comparing these approaches, it remains unclear which is superior. This meta-analysis compares the clinical outcomes of the two treatment options. Methods A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Google Search, and Cochrane databases for studies directly comparing SC and TCC of ASDs. Outcomes studied were major and minor acute complications, all-cause mortality, residual shunt, reinterventions, and length of stay (LOS). Relative risk (RR), difference in mean (DM) and 95{\%} confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method with a fixed effect model. In cases of heterogeneity (defined as I2 > 25{\%}), random effect models were used. Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses were performed for each outcome. Results Of the 1742 manuscripts screened, 26 observational studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria (total n = 14,559 patients). TCC was superior to SC for the following outcomes: all-cause mortality (RR, 0.66; 95{\%} CI 0.64–0.99), total complications (RR, 0.48; 95{\%} CI 0.35–0.65), major complications (RR, 0.57; 95{\%} CI 0.40–0.81), minor complications (RR, 0.35; 95{\%} CI 0.23–0.53), and LOS (DM, − 2.92; 95{\%} CI − 3.25 to (− 2.58)). Residual shunts were more common with TCC (RR, 3.35; 95{\%} CI 1.72–6.51). No difference was observed regarding the need of reintervention (RR, 1.45; 95{\%} CI 0.60–3.51). Meta-regression analysis showed that older age increases the risk of death and complications in patients undergoing TCC. Conclusions Though both approaches are effective, TCC is associated with lower mortality, complications, and LOS while SC has a lower rate of residual shunting.",
keywords = "Atrial septal defect, Meta-analysis, Surgery, Transcatheter",
author = "Villablanca, {Pedro A.} and Briston, {David A.} and Josep Rod{\'e}s-Cabau and Briceno, {David F.} and Gaurav Rao and Mohammed Aljoudi and Shah, {Aman M.} and Divyanshu Mohananey and Tanush Gupta and Mohammed Makkiya and Harish Ramakrishna and Garcia, {Mario J.} and Pass, {Robert H.} and Peek, {Giles J.} and Zaidi, {Ali N.}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.073",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "241",
pages = "149--155",
journal = "International Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0167-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment options for the closure of secundum atrial septal defects

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Villablanca, Pedro A.

AU - Briston, David A.

AU - Rodés-Cabau, Josep

AU - Briceno, David F.

AU - Rao, Gaurav

AU - Aljoudi, Mohammed

AU - Shah, Aman M.

AU - Mohananey, Divyanshu

AU - Gupta, Tanush

AU - Makkiya, Mohammed

AU - Ramakrishna, Harish

AU - Garcia, Mario J.

AU - Pass, Robert H.

AU - Peek, Giles J.

AU - Zaidi, Ali N.

PY - 2017/8/15

Y1 - 2017/8/15

N2 - Background Secundum atrial septal defects (ASDs) are treated by surgical closure (SC) or transcatheter device closure (TCC). Due to a scarcity of data directly comparing these approaches, it remains unclear which is superior. This meta-analysis compares the clinical outcomes of the two treatment options. Methods A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Google Search, and Cochrane databases for studies directly comparing SC and TCC of ASDs. Outcomes studied were major and minor acute complications, all-cause mortality, residual shunt, reinterventions, and length of stay (LOS). Relative risk (RR), difference in mean (DM) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method with a fixed effect model. In cases of heterogeneity (defined as I2 > 25%), random effect models were used. Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses were performed for each outcome. Results Of the 1742 manuscripts screened, 26 observational studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria (total n = 14,559 patients). TCC was superior to SC for the following outcomes: all-cause mortality (RR, 0.66; 95% CI 0.64–0.99), total complications (RR, 0.48; 95% CI 0.35–0.65), major complications (RR, 0.57; 95% CI 0.40–0.81), minor complications (RR, 0.35; 95% CI 0.23–0.53), and LOS (DM, − 2.92; 95% CI − 3.25 to (− 2.58)). Residual shunts were more common with TCC (RR, 3.35; 95% CI 1.72–6.51). No difference was observed regarding the need of reintervention (RR, 1.45; 95% CI 0.60–3.51). Meta-regression analysis showed that older age increases the risk of death and complications in patients undergoing TCC. Conclusions Though both approaches are effective, TCC is associated with lower mortality, complications, and LOS while SC has a lower rate of residual shunting.

AB - Background Secundum atrial septal defects (ASDs) are treated by surgical closure (SC) or transcatheter device closure (TCC). Due to a scarcity of data directly comparing these approaches, it remains unclear which is superior. This meta-analysis compares the clinical outcomes of the two treatment options. Methods A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Google Search, and Cochrane databases for studies directly comparing SC and TCC of ASDs. Outcomes studied were major and minor acute complications, all-cause mortality, residual shunt, reinterventions, and length of stay (LOS). Relative risk (RR), difference in mean (DM) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method with a fixed effect model. In cases of heterogeneity (defined as I2 > 25%), random effect models were used. Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses were performed for each outcome. Results Of the 1742 manuscripts screened, 26 observational studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria (total n = 14,559 patients). TCC was superior to SC for the following outcomes: all-cause mortality (RR, 0.66; 95% CI 0.64–0.99), total complications (RR, 0.48; 95% CI 0.35–0.65), major complications (RR, 0.57; 95% CI 0.40–0.81), minor complications (RR, 0.35; 95% CI 0.23–0.53), and LOS (DM, − 2.92; 95% CI − 3.25 to (− 2.58)). Residual shunts were more common with TCC (RR, 3.35; 95% CI 1.72–6.51). No difference was observed regarding the need of reintervention (RR, 1.45; 95% CI 0.60–3.51). Meta-regression analysis showed that older age increases the risk of death and complications in patients undergoing TCC. Conclusions Though both approaches are effective, TCC is associated with lower mortality, complications, and LOS while SC has a lower rate of residual shunting.

KW - Atrial septal defect

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Surgery

KW - Transcatheter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017119831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017119831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.073

DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.073

M3 - Article

C2 - 28390741

AN - SCOPUS:85017119831

VL - 241

SP - 149

EP - 155

JO - International Journal of Cardiology

JF - International Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0167-5273

ER -