Transoral robotic total laryngectomy

Richard V. Smith, Bradley A. Schiff, Catherine Sarta, Stéphane Hans, Daniel Brasnu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: Minimally invasive surgery has become the standard of care in many organ systems. Head and neck surgery has incorporated transoral surgery, either laser microsurgery or robotic resection, in the management of pharyngeal and laryngeal cancers. To date, the laryngeal procedures have taken the form of partial laryngectomy, as transoral approaches have not allowed reconstruction following total laryngectomy. We present the first series of transoral total laryngectomies. Study Design: Multinational, multi-institutional prospective consecutive case series. Methods: Case series of completed and attempted transoral robotic surgery (TORS) total laryngectomy performed under an institutional review board protocol. The procedure was developed in the cadaver laboratory and applied to selected individuals requiring total laryngectomy for recurrent laryngeal cancer or post-therapeutic organ dysfunction. Results: TORS total laryngectomy was successfully performed in five patients and was unsuccessful in two others. Two of the patients had postoperative fistulae, and all seven are without evidence of recurrent cancer and are swallowing orally without gastrostomy supplementation. Conclusions: TORS total laryngectomy is feasible and can be taught to other surgeons. Potential benefits of this approach are present for patients undergoing salvage laryngectomy and include improved wound healing and functional results. This procedure further extends the applications of robotic head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope, 2013

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)678-682
Number of pages5
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume123
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Laryngectomy
Robotics
Laryngeal Neoplasms
Neck
Head
Pharyngeal Neoplasms
Laryngoscopes
Gastrostomy
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Microsurgery
Research Ethics Committees
Laser Therapy
Standard of Care
Deglutition
Cadaver
Wound Healing
Fistula

Keywords

  • endoscopic
  • Level of Evidence: 4
  • surgery
  • Total laryngectomy
  • transoral robotic surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Transoral robotic total laryngectomy. / Smith, Richard V.; Schiff, Bradley A.; Sarta, Catherine; Hans, Stéphane; Brasnu, Daniel.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 123, No. 3, 03.2013, p. 678-682.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, RV, Schiff, BA, Sarta, C, Hans, S & Brasnu, D 2013, 'Transoral robotic total laryngectomy', Laryngoscope, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 678-682. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23842
Smith, Richard V. ; Schiff, Bradley A. ; Sarta, Catherine ; Hans, Stéphane ; Brasnu, Daniel. / Transoral robotic total laryngectomy. In: Laryngoscope. 2013 ; Vol. 123, No. 3. pp. 678-682.
@article{439ef25b3c99491296cc70aa370e25a5,
title = "Transoral robotic total laryngectomy",
abstract = "Objectives/Hypothesis: Minimally invasive surgery has become the standard of care in many organ systems. Head and neck surgery has incorporated transoral surgery, either laser microsurgery or robotic resection, in the management of pharyngeal and laryngeal cancers. To date, the laryngeal procedures have taken the form of partial laryngectomy, as transoral approaches have not allowed reconstruction following total laryngectomy. We present the first series of transoral total laryngectomies. Study Design: Multinational, multi-institutional prospective consecutive case series. Methods: Case series of completed and attempted transoral robotic surgery (TORS) total laryngectomy performed under an institutional review board protocol. The procedure was developed in the cadaver laboratory and applied to selected individuals requiring total laryngectomy for recurrent laryngeal cancer or post-therapeutic organ dysfunction. Results: TORS total laryngectomy was successfully performed in five patients and was unsuccessful in two others. Two of the patients had postoperative fistulae, and all seven are without evidence of recurrent cancer and are swallowing orally without gastrostomy supplementation. Conclusions: TORS total laryngectomy is feasible and can be taught to other surgeons. Potential benefits of this approach are present for patients undergoing salvage laryngectomy and include improved wound healing and functional results. This procedure further extends the applications of robotic head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope, 2013",
keywords = "endoscopic, Level of Evidence: 4, surgery, Total laryngectomy, transoral robotic surgery",
author = "Smith, {Richard V.} and Schiff, {Bradley A.} and Catherine Sarta and St{\'e}phane Hans and Daniel Brasnu",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1002/lary.23842",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "123",
pages = "678--682",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transoral robotic total laryngectomy

AU - Smith, Richard V.

AU - Schiff, Bradley A.

AU - Sarta, Catherine

AU - Hans, Stéphane

AU - Brasnu, Daniel

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis: Minimally invasive surgery has become the standard of care in many organ systems. Head and neck surgery has incorporated transoral surgery, either laser microsurgery or robotic resection, in the management of pharyngeal and laryngeal cancers. To date, the laryngeal procedures have taken the form of partial laryngectomy, as transoral approaches have not allowed reconstruction following total laryngectomy. We present the first series of transoral total laryngectomies. Study Design: Multinational, multi-institutional prospective consecutive case series. Methods: Case series of completed and attempted transoral robotic surgery (TORS) total laryngectomy performed under an institutional review board protocol. The procedure was developed in the cadaver laboratory and applied to selected individuals requiring total laryngectomy for recurrent laryngeal cancer or post-therapeutic organ dysfunction. Results: TORS total laryngectomy was successfully performed in five patients and was unsuccessful in two others. Two of the patients had postoperative fistulae, and all seven are without evidence of recurrent cancer and are swallowing orally without gastrostomy supplementation. Conclusions: TORS total laryngectomy is feasible and can be taught to other surgeons. Potential benefits of this approach are present for patients undergoing salvage laryngectomy and include improved wound healing and functional results. This procedure further extends the applications of robotic head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope, 2013

AB - Objectives/Hypothesis: Minimally invasive surgery has become the standard of care in many organ systems. Head and neck surgery has incorporated transoral surgery, either laser microsurgery or robotic resection, in the management of pharyngeal and laryngeal cancers. To date, the laryngeal procedures have taken the form of partial laryngectomy, as transoral approaches have not allowed reconstruction following total laryngectomy. We present the first series of transoral total laryngectomies. Study Design: Multinational, multi-institutional prospective consecutive case series. Methods: Case series of completed and attempted transoral robotic surgery (TORS) total laryngectomy performed under an institutional review board protocol. The procedure was developed in the cadaver laboratory and applied to selected individuals requiring total laryngectomy for recurrent laryngeal cancer or post-therapeutic organ dysfunction. Results: TORS total laryngectomy was successfully performed in five patients and was unsuccessful in two others. Two of the patients had postoperative fistulae, and all seven are without evidence of recurrent cancer and are swallowing orally without gastrostomy supplementation. Conclusions: TORS total laryngectomy is feasible and can be taught to other surgeons. Potential benefits of this approach are present for patients undergoing salvage laryngectomy and include improved wound healing and functional results. This procedure further extends the applications of robotic head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope, 2013

KW - endoscopic

KW - Level of Evidence: 4

KW - surgery

KW - Total laryngectomy

KW - transoral robotic surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874427166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874427166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.23842

DO - 10.1002/lary.23842

M3 - Article

C2 - 23299907

AN - SCOPUS:84874427166

VL - 123

SP - 678

EP - 682

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 3

ER -