Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift

Bruce D. Rapkin, Carolyn E. Schwartz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

263 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mounting evidence for response shifts in quality of life (QOL) appraisal indicates the need to include direct measurement of the appraisal process itself as a necessary part of QOL assessment. We propose that directly assessing QOL appraisal processes will not only improve our ability to interpret QOL scores in the traditional sense, but will also yield a deeper understanding of the appraisal process in the attribution of and divergence in meaning. The published evidence for response shift is reviewed, and an assessment paradigm is proposed that includes the explicit measurement of QOL appraisal process parameters: 1) induction of a frame of reference; 2) recall and sampling of salient experiences; 3) standards of comparison used to appraise experiences; and 4) subjective algorithm used to prioritize and combine appraisals to arrive at a QOL rating. A QOL Appraisal Profile, which measures key appraisal processes, is introduced as an adjunct to existing QOL scales. The proposed theoretical model, building on the Sprangers and Schwartz (1999) model and highlighting appraisal processes, provides a fully testable theoretical treatment of QOL and change in QOL, suggesting hypothesized causal relationships and explanatory pathways for both cross-sectional and longitudinal QOL research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number14
JournalHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes
Volume2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Theoretical Models
Quality of Life
Aptitude
Research

Keywords

  • Appraisal
  • Individual differences
  • Quality of life assessment
  • Response shift theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{73265450ed7c4cd6a6d0253641a1505a,
title = "Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift",
abstract = "Mounting evidence for response shifts in quality of life (QOL) appraisal indicates the need to include direct measurement of the appraisal process itself as a necessary part of QOL assessment. We propose that directly assessing QOL appraisal processes will not only improve our ability to interpret QOL scores in the traditional sense, but will also yield a deeper understanding of the appraisal process in the attribution of and divergence in meaning. The published evidence for response shift is reviewed, and an assessment paradigm is proposed that includes the explicit measurement of QOL appraisal process parameters: 1) induction of a frame of reference; 2) recall and sampling of salient experiences; 3) standards of comparison used to appraise experiences; and 4) subjective algorithm used to prioritize and combine appraisals to arrive at a QOL rating. A QOL Appraisal Profile, which measures key appraisal processes, is introduced as an adjunct to existing QOL scales. The proposed theoretical model, building on the Sprangers and Schwartz (1999) model and highlighting appraisal processes, provides a fully testable theoretical treatment of QOL and change in QOL, suggesting hypothesized causal relationships and explanatory pathways for both cross-sectional and longitudinal QOL research.",
keywords = "Appraisal, Individual differences, Quality of life assessment, Response shift theory",
author = "Rapkin, {Bruce D.} and Schwartz, {Carolyn E.}",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1186/1477-7525-2-14",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
journal = "Health and Quality of Life Outcomes",
issn = "1477-7525",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal

T2 - Implications of findings from studies of response shift

AU - Rapkin, Bruce D.

AU - Schwartz, Carolyn E.

PY - 2004/3/15

Y1 - 2004/3/15

N2 - Mounting evidence for response shifts in quality of life (QOL) appraisal indicates the need to include direct measurement of the appraisal process itself as a necessary part of QOL assessment. We propose that directly assessing QOL appraisal processes will not only improve our ability to interpret QOL scores in the traditional sense, but will also yield a deeper understanding of the appraisal process in the attribution of and divergence in meaning. The published evidence for response shift is reviewed, and an assessment paradigm is proposed that includes the explicit measurement of QOL appraisal process parameters: 1) induction of a frame of reference; 2) recall and sampling of salient experiences; 3) standards of comparison used to appraise experiences; and 4) subjective algorithm used to prioritize and combine appraisals to arrive at a QOL rating. A QOL Appraisal Profile, which measures key appraisal processes, is introduced as an adjunct to existing QOL scales. The proposed theoretical model, building on the Sprangers and Schwartz (1999) model and highlighting appraisal processes, provides a fully testable theoretical treatment of QOL and change in QOL, suggesting hypothesized causal relationships and explanatory pathways for both cross-sectional and longitudinal QOL research.

AB - Mounting evidence for response shifts in quality of life (QOL) appraisal indicates the need to include direct measurement of the appraisal process itself as a necessary part of QOL assessment. We propose that directly assessing QOL appraisal processes will not only improve our ability to interpret QOL scores in the traditional sense, but will also yield a deeper understanding of the appraisal process in the attribution of and divergence in meaning. The published evidence for response shift is reviewed, and an assessment paradigm is proposed that includes the explicit measurement of QOL appraisal process parameters: 1) induction of a frame of reference; 2) recall and sampling of salient experiences; 3) standards of comparison used to appraise experiences; and 4) subjective algorithm used to prioritize and combine appraisals to arrive at a QOL rating. A QOL Appraisal Profile, which measures key appraisal processes, is introduced as an adjunct to existing QOL scales. The proposed theoretical model, building on the Sprangers and Schwartz (1999) model and highlighting appraisal processes, provides a fully testable theoretical treatment of QOL and change in QOL, suggesting hypothesized causal relationships and explanatory pathways for both cross-sectional and longitudinal QOL research.

KW - Appraisal

KW - Individual differences

KW - Quality of life assessment

KW - Response shift theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4344703446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4344703446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1477-7525-2-14

DO - 10.1186/1477-7525-2-14

M3 - Article

C2 - 15023229

AN - SCOPUS:4344703446

VL - 2

JO - Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

JF - Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

SN - 1477-7525

M1 - 14

ER -