Tks5 and SHIP2 regulate invadopodium maturation, but not initiation, in breast carcinoma cells

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Tks5 regulates invadopodium formation, but the precise timing during invadopodium lifetime (initiation, stabilization, maturation) when Tks5 plays a role is not known. Results: We report new findings based on high-resolution spatiotemporal live-cell imaging of invadopodium precursor assembly. Cortactin, N-WASP, cofilin, and actin arrive together to form the invadopodium precursor, followed by Tks5 recruitment. Tks5 is not required for precursor initiation but is needed for precursor stabilization, which requires the interaction of the phox homology (PX) domain of Tks5 with PI(3,4)P 2. During precursor formation, PI(3,4)P2 is uniformly distributed but subsequently starts accumulating at the precursor core 3-4 min after core initiation, and conversely, PI(3,4,5)P3 gets enriched in a ring around the precursor core. SHIP2, a 5′-inositol phosphatase, localizes at the invadopodium core and regulates PI(3,4)P2 levels locally at the invadopodium. The timing of SHIP2 arrival at the invadopodium precursor coincides with the onset of PI(3,4)P2 accumulation. Consistent with its late arrival, we found that SHIP2 inhibition does not affect precursor formation but does cause decreases in mature invadopodia and matrix degradation, whereas SHIP2 overexpression increases matrix degradation. Conclusions: Together, these findings lead us to propose a new sequential model that provides novel insights into molecular mechanisms underlying invadopodium precursor initiation, stabilization, and maturation into a functional invadopodium.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2079-2089
Number of pages11
JournalCurrent Biology
Volume23
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 4 2013

Fingerprint

breast neoplasms
Stabilization
Cells
Breast Neoplasms
degradation
Cortactin
sequence homology
Actin Depolymerizing Factors
actin
Degradation
image analysis
cells
Actins
Imaging techniques
phosphoinositide-3,4-bisphosphate
Podosomes
inositols
phosphoinositide-3,4,5-triphosphate
4-ethoxymethylene-2-phenyl-2-oxazoline-5-one
myo-inositol-1 (or 4)-monophosphatase

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

Tks5 and SHIP2 regulate invadopodium maturation, but not initiation, in breast carcinoma cells. / Sharma, Ved P.; Eddy, Robert J.; Entenberg, David R.; Kai, Masayuki; Gertler, Frank B.; Condeelis, John S.

In: Current Biology, Vol. 23, No. 21, 04.11.2013, p. 2079-2089.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1885d2342fc44ef8b54f506e3d229cef,
title = "Tks5 and SHIP2 regulate invadopodium maturation, but not initiation, in breast carcinoma cells",
abstract = "Background: Tks5 regulates invadopodium formation, but the precise timing during invadopodium lifetime (initiation, stabilization, maturation) when Tks5 plays a role is not known. Results: We report new findings based on high-resolution spatiotemporal live-cell imaging of invadopodium precursor assembly. Cortactin, N-WASP, cofilin, and actin arrive together to form the invadopodium precursor, followed by Tks5 recruitment. Tks5 is not required for precursor initiation but is needed for precursor stabilization, which requires the interaction of the phox homology (PX) domain of Tks5 with PI(3,4)P 2. During precursor formation, PI(3,4)P2 is uniformly distributed but subsequently starts accumulating at the precursor core 3-4 min after core initiation, and conversely, PI(3,4,5)P3 gets enriched in a ring around the precursor core. SHIP2, a 5′-inositol phosphatase, localizes at the invadopodium core and regulates PI(3,4)P2 levels locally at the invadopodium. The timing of SHIP2 arrival at the invadopodium precursor coincides with the onset of PI(3,4)P2 accumulation. Consistent with its late arrival, we found that SHIP2 inhibition does not affect precursor formation but does cause decreases in mature invadopodia and matrix degradation, whereas SHIP2 overexpression increases matrix degradation. Conclusions: Together, these findings lead us to propose a new sequential model that provides novel insights into molecular mechanisms underlying invadopodium precursor initiation, stabilization, and maturation into a functional invadopodium.",
author = "Sharma, {Ved P.} and Eddy, {Robert J.} and Entenberg, {David R.} and Masayuki Kai and Gertler, {Frank B.} and Condeelis, {John S.}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.044",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "2079--2089",
journal = "Current Biology",
issn = "0960-9822",
publisher = "Cell Press",
number = "21",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tks5 and SHIP2 regulate invadopodium maturation, but not initiation, in breast carcinoma cells

AU - Sharma, Ved P.

AU - Eddy, Robert J.

AU - Entenberg, David R.

AU - Kai, Masayuki

AU - Gertler, Frank B.

AU - Condeelis, John S.

PY - 2013/11/4

Y1 - 2013/11/4

N2 - Background: Tks5 regulates invadopodium formation, but the precise timing during invadopodium lifetime (initiation, stabilization, maturation) when Tks5 plays a role is not known. Results: We report new findings based on high-resolution spatiotemporal live-cell imaging of invadopodium precursor assembly. Cortactin, N-WASP, cofilin, and actin arrive together to form the invadopodium precursor, followed by Tks5 recruitment. Tks5 is not required for precursor initiation but is needed for precursor stabilization, which requires the interaction of the phox homology (PX) domain of Tks5 with PI(3,4)P 2. During precursor formation, PI(3,4)P2 is uniformly distributed but subsequently starts accumulating at the precursor core 3-4 min after core initiation, and conversely, PI(3,4,5)P3 gets enriched in a ring around the precursor core. SHIP2, a 5′-inositol phosphatase, localizes at the invadopodium core and regulates PI(3,4)P2 levels locally at the invadopodium. The timing of SHIP2 arrival at the invadopodium precursor coincides with the onset of PI(3,4)P2 accumulation. Consistent with its late arrival, we found that SHIP2 inhibition does not affect precursor formation but does cause decreases in mature invadopodia and matrix degradation, whereas SHIP2 overexpression increases matrix degradation. Conclusions: Together, these findings lead us to propose a new sequential model that provides novel insights into molecular mechanisms underlying invadopodium precursor initiation, stabilization, and maturation into a functional invadopodium.

AB - Background: Tks5 regulates invadopodium formation, but the precise timing during invadopodium lifetime (initiation, stabilization, maturation) when Tks5 plays a role is not known. Results: We report new findings based on high-resolution spatiotemporal live-cell imaging of invadopodium precursor assembly. Cortactin, N-WASP, cofilin, and actin arrive together to form the invadopodium precursor, followed by Tks5 recruitment. Tks5 is not required for precursor initiation but is needed for precursor stabilization, which requires the interaction of the phox homology (PX) domain of Tks5 with PI(3,4)P 2. During precursor formation, PI(3,4)P2 is uniformly distributed but subsequently starts accumulating at the precursor core 3-4 min after core initiation, and conversely, PI(3,4,5)P3 gets enriched in a ring around the precursor core. SHIP2, a 5′-inositol phosphatase, localizes at the invadopodium core and regulates PI(3,4)P2 levels locally at the invadopodium. The timing of SHIP2 arrival at the invadopodium precursor coincides with the onset of PI(3,4)P2 accumulation. Consistent with its late arrival, we found that SHIP2 inhibition does not affect precursor formation but does cause decreases in mature invadopodia and matrix degradation, whereas SHIP2 overexpression increases matrix degradation. Conclusions: Together, these findings lead us to propose a new sequential model that provides novel insights into molecular mechanisms underlying invadopodium precursor initiation, stabilization, and maturation into a functional invadopodium.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887161574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887161574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.044

DO - 10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.044

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 2079

EP - 2089

JO - Current Biology

JF - Current Biology

SN - 0960-9822

IS - 21

ER -