Three-level rating of turns while walking

Sarah E. England, Joe Verghese, Jeannette R. Mahoney, Constantin Trantzas, Roee Holtzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research concerning the assessment of turns during walking in healthy older adults is scarce. This study compared three independent assessments of entry and exit points of turns during walking; participant, clinical rater, and a computer algorithm. Nineteen non-demented and nondisabled older adults (mean age 75.40. ±. 5.52 years) participated in the current study. Results revealed that overall the three assessment methods were consistent (68-100% agreement). However, participants determined their turn exit point before the algorithm, (-304.53. ±. 326.67. ms), t(18). =. -4.06, p=. .001, 95% CI [-461.98, -147.08], and clinical rater, (-225.79. ±. 303.79. ms), t(18). =. -3.24, p=. .005, 95% CI [-372.21, -79.37]. The differences in turn determination between the algorithm and rater were significant at turn entry points (131.24. ±. 127.25. ms), t(18). =. 4.50, p<. .001, 95% CI [69.91, 192.58] but not at turn exit points (-78.74. ±. 259.66. ms), t(18). =. -1.32, p<. .20, 95% CI [-203.89, -46.41]. Greater time discrepancies in assessing turn exit points between the participants and both the algorithm and clinical rater were associated with worse visuospatial performance. Despite the relatively small difference among the three assessments of turns, they were consistent and can be utilized interchangeably. Further studies are necessary to determine whether differences in the ability to accurately determine turns entry and exit points are related to fall risk in normal and disease populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)300-303
Number of pages4
JournalGait and Posture
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Walking
Research
Population

Keywords

  • Older adults
  • Visual perception
  • Walking turns

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Biophysics

Cite this

Three-level rating of turns while walking. / England, Sarah E.; Verghese, Joe; Mahoney, Jeannette R.; Trantzas, Constantin; Holtzer, Roee.

In: Gait and Posture, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2015, p. 300-303.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

England, Sarah E. ; Verghese, Joe ; Mahoney, Jeannette R. ; Trantzas, Constantin ; Holtzer, Roee. / Three-level rating of turns while walking. In: Gait and Posture. 2015 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 300-303.
@article{7aefef11736c4bf8bdc6f3132c3f717b,
title = "Three-level rating of turns while walking",
abstract = "Research concerning the assessment of turns during walking in healthy older adults is scarce. This study compared three independent assessments of entry and exit points of turns during walking; participant, clinical rater, and a computer algorithm. Nineteen non-demented and nondisabled older adults (mean age 75.40. ±. 5.52 years) participated in the current study. Results revealed that overall the three assessment methods were consistent (68-100{\%} agreement). However, participants determined their turn exit point before the algorithm, (-304.53. ±. 326.67. ms), t(18). =. -4.06, p=. .001, 95{\%} CI [-461.98, -147.08], and clinical rater, (-225.79. ±. 303.79. ms), t(18). =. -3.24, p=. .005, 95{\%} CI [-372.21, -79.37]. The differences in turn determination between the algorithm and rater were significant at turn entry points (131.24. ±. 127.25. ms), t(18). =. 4.50, p<. .001, 95{\%} CI [69.91, 192.58] but not at turn exit points (-78.74. ±. 259.66. ms), t(18). =. -1.32, p<. .20, 95{\%} CI [-203.89, -46.41]. Greater time discrepancies in assessing turn exit points between the participants and both the algorithm and clinical rater were associated with worse visuospatial performance. Despite the relatively small difference among the three assessments of turns, they were consistent and can be utilized interchangeably. Further studies are necessary to determine whether differences in the ability to accurately determine turns entry and exit points are related to fall risk in normal and disease populations.",
keywords = "Older adults, Visual perception, Walking turns",
author = "England, {Sarah E.} and Joe Verghese and Mahoney, {Jeannette R.} and Constantin Trantzas and Roee Holtzer",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.09.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "300--303",
journal = "Gait and Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three-level rating of turns while walking

AU - England, Sarah E.

AU - Verghese, Joe

AU - Mahoney, Jeannette R.

AU - Trantzas, Constantin

AU - Holtzer, Roee

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Research concerning the assessment of turns during walking in healthy older adults is scarce. This study compared three independent assessments of entry and exit points of turns during walking; participant, clinical rater, and a computer algorithm. Nineteen non-demented and nondisabled older adults (mean age 75.40. ±. 5.52 years) participated in the current study. Results revealed that overall the three assessment methods were consistent (68-100% agreement). However, participants determined their turn exit point before the algorithm, (-304.53. ±. 326.67. ms), t(18). =. -4.06, p=. .001, 95% CI [-461.98, -147.08], and clinical rater, (-225.79. ±. 303.79. ms), t(18). =. -3.24, p=. .005, 95% CI [-372.21, -79.37]. The differences in turn determination between the algorithm and rater were significant at turn entry points (131.24. ±. 127.25. ms), t(18). =. 4.50, p<. .001, 95% CI [69.91, 192.58] but not at turn exit points (-78.74. ±. 259.66. ms), t(18). =. -1.32, p<. .20, 95% CI [-203.89, -46.41]. Greater time discrepancies in assessing turn exit points between the participants and both the algorithm and clinical rater were associated with worse visuospatial performance. Despite the relatively small difference among the three assessments of turns, they were consistent and can be utilized interchangeably. Further studies are necessary to determine whether differences in the ability to accurately determine turns entry and exit points are related to fall risk in normal and disease populations.

AB - Research concerning the assessment of turns during walking in healthy older adults is scarce. This study compared three independent assessments of entry and exit points of turns during walking; participant, clinical rater, and a computer algorithm. Nineteen non-demented and nondisabled older adults (mean age 75.40. ±. 5.52 years) participated in the current study. Results revealed that overall the three assessment methods were consistent (68-100% agreement). However, participants determined their turn exit point before the algorithm, (-304.53. ±. 326.67. ms), t(18). =. -4.06, p=. .001, 95% CI [-461.98, -147.08], and clinical rater, (-225.79. ±. 303.79. ms), t(18). =. -3.24, p=. .005, 95% CI [-372.21, -79.37]. The differences in turn determination between the algorithm and rater were significant at turn entry points (131.24. ±. 127.25. ms), t(18). =. 4.50, p<. .001, 95% CI [69.91, 192.58] but not at turn exit points (-78.74. ±. 259.66. ms), t(18). =. -1.32, p<. .20, 95% CI [-203.89, -46.41]. Greater time discrepancies in assessing turn exit points between the participants and both the algorithm and clinical rater were associated with worse visuospatial performance. Despite the relatively small difference among the three assessments of turns, they were consistent and can be utilized interchangeably. Further studies are necessary to determine whether differences in the ability to accurately determine turns entry and exit points are related to fall risk in normal and disease populations.

KW - Older adults

KW - Visual perception

KW - Walking turns

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925135621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925135621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.09.010

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.09.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 25282258

AN - SCOPUS:84925135621

VL - 41

SP - 300

EP - 303

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

IS - 1

ER -