The utility of an in-hospital observation period after discontinuing intravenous antibiotics

Andrew S. Dunn, Keri L. Peterson, Clyde B. Schechter, Philip Rabito, Andrew D. Gotlin, Lawrence G. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether observing patients overnight in the hospital after intravenous antibiotics have been discontinued is a useful way to identify important clinical events. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients admitted during a 6-month period to a tertiary care teaching hospital with a primary diagnosis of either pneumonia, urinary tract infection, or cellulitis who were treated with intravenous antibiotics. Charts were abstracted for patient characteristics, including comorbid illnesses and laboratory values, as well as for evidence of recurrent infection or other adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 374 patients in the study, 63 (17%) were discharged on the day intravenous antibiotics were discontinued. These patients were 10 years younger (P = 0.0009) and had fewer comorbid illnesses (P = 0.02) than those who were observed in the hospital. Recurrent infection was noted in 3 (1%; 95% confidence interval 0.2% to 3%) of the 308 patients who were observed. A mild adverse antibiotic reaction was also noted in three observed patients. The readmission rate to the same institution for recurrent infection was 3% for patients with an observation period and 2% for patients without an observation period (P = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Observing patients overnight in the hospital after discontinuing intravenous antibiotics is a common clinical practice. There was an extremely low incidence of adverse events during the observation period, and the events that did occur would have been discovered in an outpatient setting. In- hospital observation after discontinuing intravenous antibiotics is unnecessary for most patients with pneumonia, urinary tract infection, or cellulitis and greatly increases health-care costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6-10
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Medicine
Volume106
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Observation
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Cellulitis
Urinary Tract Infections
Pneumonia
Infection
Tertiary Healthcare
Teaching Hospitals
Health Care Costs
Outpatients
Confidence Intervals
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

The utility of an in-hospital observation period after discontinuing intravenous antibiotics. / Dunn, Andrew S.; Peterson, Keri L.; Schechter, Clyde B.; Rabito, Philip; Gotlin, Andrew D.; Smith, Lawrence G.

In: American Journal of Medicine, Vol. 106, No. 1, 01.1999, p. 6-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dunn, Andrew S. ; Peterson, Keri L. ; Schechter, Clyde B. ; Rabito, Philip ; Gotlin, Andrew D. ; Smith, Lawrence G. / The utility of an in-hospital observation period after discontinuing intravenous antibiotics. In: American Journal of Medicine. 1999 ; Vol. 106, No. 1. pp. 6-10.
@article{2f5e8d8494c8450492735b4344908f4b,
title = "The utility of an in-hospital observation period after discontinuing intravenous antibiotics",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To determine whether observing patients overnight in the hospital after intravenous antibiotics have been discontinued is a useful way to identify important clinical events. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients admitted during a 6-month period to a tertiary care teaching hospital with a primary diagnosis of either pneumonia, urinary tract infection, or cellulitis who were treated with intravenous antibiotics. Charts were abstracted for patient characteristics, including comorbid illnesses and laboratory values, as well as for evidence of recurrent infection or other adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 374 patients in the study, 63 (17{\%}) were discharged on the day intravenous antibiotics were discontinued. These patients were 10 years younger (P = 0.0009) and had fewer comorbid illnesses (P = 0.02) than those who were observed in the hospital. Recurrent infection was noted in 3 (1{\%}; 95{\%} confidence interval 0.2{\%} to 3{\%}) of the 308 patients who were observed. A mild adverse antibiotic reaction was also noted in three observed patients. The readmission rate to the same institution for recurrent infection was 3{\%} for patients with an observation period and 2{\%} for patients without an observation period (P = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Observing patients overnight in the hospital after discontinuing intravenous antibiotics is a common clinical practice. There was an extremely low incidence of adverse events during the observation period, and the events that did occur would have been discovered in an outpatient setting. In- hospital observation after discontinuing intravenous antibiotics is unnecessary for most patients with pneumonia, urinary tract infection, or cellulitis and greatly increases health-care costs.",
author = "Dunn, {Andrew S.} and Peterson, {Keri L.} and Schechter, {Clyde B.} and Philip Rabito and Gotlin, {Andrew D.} and Smith, {Lawrence G.}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00359-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "6--10",
journal = "American Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0002-9343",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The utility of an in-hospital observation period after discontinuing intravenous antibiotics

AU - Dunn, Andrew S.

AU - Peterson, Keri L.

AU - Schechter, Clyde B.

AU - Rabito, Philip

AU - Gotlin, Andrew D.

AU - Smith, Lawrence G.

PY - 1999/1

Y1 - 1999/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To determine whether observing patients overnight in the hospital after intravenous antibiotics have been discontinued is a useful way to identify important clinical events. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients admitted during a 6-month period to a tertiary care teaching hospital with a primary diagnosis of either pneumonia, urinary tract infection, or cellulitis who were treated with intravenous antibiotics. Charts were abstracted for patient characteristics, including comorbid illnesses and laboratory values, as well as for evidence of recurrent infection or other adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 374 patients in the study, 63 (17%) were discharged on the day intravenous antibiotics were discontinued. These patients were 10 years younger (P = 0.0009) and had fewer comorbid illnesses (P = 0.02) than those who were observed in the hospital. Recurrent infection was noted in 3 (1%; 95% confidence interval 0.2% to 3%) of the 308 patients who were observed. A mild adverse antibiotic reaction was also noted in three observed patients. The readmission rate to the same institution for recurrent infection was 3% for patients with an observation period and 2% for patients without an observation period (P = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Observing patients overnight in the hospital after discontinuing intravenous antibiotics is a common clinical practice. There was an extremely low incidence of adverse events during the observation period, and the events that did occur would have been discovered in an outpatient setting. In- hospital observation after discontinuing intravenous antibiotics is unnecessary for most patients with pneumonia, urinary tract infection, or cellulitis and greatly increases health-care costs.

AB - PURPOSE: To determine whether observing patients overnight in the hospital after intravenous antibiotics have been discontinued is a useful way to identify important clinical events. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients admitted during a 6-month period to a tertiary care teaching hospital with a primary diagnosis of either pneumonia, urinary tract infection, or cellulitis who were treated with intravenous antibiotics. Charts were abstracted for patient characteristics, including comorbid illnesses and laboratory values, as well as for evidence of recurrent infection or other adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 374 patients in the study, 63 (17%) were discharged on the day intravenous antibiotics were discontinued. These patients were 10 years younger (P = 0.0009) and had fewer comorbid illnesses (P = 0.02) than those who were observed in the hospital. Recurrent infection was noted in 3 (1%; 95% confidence interval 0.2% to 3%) of the 308 patients who were observed. A mild adverse antibiotic reaction was also noted in three observed patients. The readmission rate to the same institution for recurrent infection was 3% for patients with an observation period and 2% for patients without an observation period (P = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Observing patients overnight in the hospital after discontinuing intravenous antibiotics is a common clinical practice. There was an extremely low incidence of adverse events during the observation period, and the events that did occur would have been discovered in an outpatient setting. In- hospital observation after discontinuing intravenous antibiotics is unnecessary for most patients with pneumonia, urinary tract infection, or cellulitis and greatly increases health-care costs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033058544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033058544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00359-3

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00359-3

M3 - Article

VL - 106

SP - 6

EP - 10

JO - American Journal of Medicine

JF - American Journal of Medicine

SN - 0002-9343

IS - 1

ER -