The usefulness of urine fluorescence for suspected antifreeze ingestion in children

Tania Parsa, Sandra J. Cunningham, Stephen P. Wall, Steven C. Almo, Ellen F. Crain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate urine fluorescence as a diagnostic tool. Procedures: Using a Wood lamp, 60 physicians, assigned to group 1 or 2, independently rated 150 urine specimens from nonpoisoned children as fluorescent or nonfluorescent. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were assessed. Physician ratings were compared with fluorometry results. The prevalence of urine fluorescence was determined by fluorometry. Main Findings: Group 1 reported fluorescence in 80.7% (95% CI 73.4%-86.6%) of urine specimens; group 2 reported fluorescence in 69.3% (95% CI 61.3%-76.5%). Interrater agreement was poor (72.5%, κ = 0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.37); intrarater agreement was good (physician group 1: 97.9%, κ = 0.93, 95% CI 0.77-1.00; physician group 2: 93.3%, κ = 0.85, 95% CI 0.69-1.00). The prevalence of urine fluorescence was 100% (95% CI 98.1%-100%). Conclusion: Our data suggest that determination of urine fluorescence using a Wood lamp is a poor screening tool for suspected antifreeze ingestion in children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)787-792
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2005

Fingerprint

Eating
Fluorescence
Urine
Physicians
Fluorometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

The usefulness of urine fluorescence for suspected antifreeze ingestion in children. / Parsa, Tania; Cunningham, Sandra J.; Wall, Stephen P.; Almo, Steven C.; Crain, Ellen F.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 6, 10.2005, p. 787-792.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Parsa, Tania ; Cunningham, Sandra J. ; Wall, Stephen P. ; Almo, Steven C. ; Crain, Ellen F. / The usefulness of urine fluorescence for suspected antifreeze ingestion in children. In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2005 ; Vol. 23, No. 6. pp. 787-792.
@article{a96add158fbe47afb018086b361789a3,
title = "The usefulness of urine fluorescence for suspected antifreeze ingestion in children",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate urine fluorescence as a diagnostic tool. Procedures: Using a Wood lamp, 60 physicians, assigned to group 1 or 2, independently rated 150 urine specimens from nonpoisoned children as fluorescent or nonfluorescent. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were assessed. Physician ratings were compared with fluorometry results. The prevalence of urine fluorescence was determined by fluorometry. Main Findings: Group 1 reported fluorescence in 80.7{\%} (95{\%} CI 73.4{\%}-86.6{\%}) of urine specimens; group 2 reported fluorescence in 69.3{\%} (95{\%} CI 61.3{\%}-76.5{\%}). Interrater agreement was poor (72.5{\%}, κ = 0.25, 95{\%} CI 0.13-0.37); intrarater agreement was good (physician group 1: 97.9{\%}, κ = 0.93, 95{\%} CI 0.77-1.00; physician group 2: 93.3{\%}, κ = 0.85, 95{\%} CI 0.69-1.00). The prevalence of urine fluorescence was 100{\%} (95{\%} CI 98.1{\%}-100{\%}). Conclusion: Our data suggest that determination of urine fluorescence using a Wood lamp is a poor screening tool for suspected antifreeze ingestion in children.",
author = "Tania Parsa and Cunningham, {Sandra J.} and Wall, {Stephen P.} and Almo, {Steven C.} and Crain, {Ellen F.}",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajem.2005.02.051",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "787--792",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The usefulness of urine fluorescence for suspected antifreeze ingestion in children

AU - Parsa, Tania

AU - Cunningham, Sandra J.

AU - Wall, Stephen P.

AU - Almo, Steven C.

AU - Crain, Ellen F.

PY - 2005/10

Y1 - 2005/10

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate urine fluorescence as a diagnostic tool. Procedures: Using a Wood lamp, 60 physicians, assigned to group 1 or 2, independently rated 150 urine specimens from nonpoisoned children as fluorescent or nonfluorescent. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were assessed. Physician ratings were compared with fluorometry results. The prevalence of urine fluorescence was determined by fluorometry. Main Findings: Group 1 reported fluorescence in 80.7% (95% CI 73.4%-86.6%) of urine specimens; group 2 reported fluorescence in 69.3% (95% CI 61.3%-76.5%). Interrater agreement was poor (72.5%, κ = 0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.37); intrarater agreement was good (physician group 1: 97.9%, κ = 0.93, 95% CI 0.77-1.00; physician group 2: 93.3%, κ = 0.85, 95% CI 0.69-1.00). The prevalence of urine fluorescence was 100% (95% CI 98.1%-100%). Conclusion: Our data suggest that determination of urine fluorescence using a Wood lamp is a poor screening tool for suspected antifreeze ingestion in children.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate urine fluorescence as a diagnostic tool. Procedures: Using a Wood lamp, 60 physicians, assigned to group 1 or 2, independently rated 150 urine specimens from nonpoisoned children as fluorescent or nonfluorescent. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were assessed. Physician ratings were compared with fluorometry results. The prevalence of urine fluorescence was determined by fluorometry. Main Findings: Group 1 reported fluorescence in 80.7% (95% CI 73.4%-86.6%) of urine specimens; group 2 reported fluorescence in 69.3% (95% CI 61.3%-76.5%). Interrater agreement was poor (72.5%, κ = 0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.37); intrarater agreement was good (physician group 1: 97.9%, κ = 0.93, 95% CI 0.77-1.00; physician group 2: 93.3%, κ = 0.85, 95% CI 0.69-1.00). The prevalence of urine fluorescence was 100% (95% CI 98.1%-100%). Conclusion: Our data suggest that determination of urine fluorescence using a Wood lamp is a poor screening tool for suspected antifreeze ingestion in children.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25144492846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25144492846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.02.051

DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.02.051

M3 - Article

C2 - 16182989

AN - SCOPUS:25144492846

VL - 23

SP - 787

EP - 792

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 6

ER -