The unintended consequences of quality improvement

Naomi S. Bardach, Michael D. Cabana

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of review: The focus on quality improvement has led to several types of initiatives in pediatric care; however, these programs may lead to potential unintended consequences. Recent findings: Unintended consequences of quality improvement programs that have been described are reviewed. Unintended effects on resource utilization include effects on costs, as well as the inability to apply programs across different populations and affect disparities in care. Unintended effects on provider behavior include measurement fixation behavior, as well as 'crowding out' behavior, in which gains in quality in one area may simply occur at the expense of quality of care in another. Patient preferences may not always match specific quality improvement measures. Unintended effects for patients may include decreased patient satisfaction, trust, or confidence in their provider. Summary: Recognition and anticipation of the possible unintended consequences of guideline implementation is a critical step to harnessing all the benefits of quality improvement in practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)777-782
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Pediatrics
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Crowding
Patient Preference
Quality of Health Care
Patient Satisfaction
Guidelines
Pediatrics
Costs and Cost Analysis
Population

Keywords

  • Asthma
  • Clinical practice guidelines
  • Pay for performance
  • Quality improvement
  • Unintended consequences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

The unintended consequences of quality improvement. / Bardach, Naomi S.; Cabana, Michael D.

In: Current Opinion in Pediatrics, Vol. 21, No. 6, 01.12.2009, p. 777-782.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{d0a1cd7c885d4b9ab089e4f69490a45b,
title = "The unintended consequences of quality improvement",
abstract = "Purpose of review: The focus on quality improvement has led to several types of initiatives in pediatric care; however, these programs may lead to potential unintended consequences. Recent findings: Unintended consequences of quality improvement programs that have been described are reviewed. Unintended effects on resource utilization include effects on costs, as well as the inability to apply programs across different populations and affect disparities in care. Unintended effects on provider behavior include measurement fixation behavior, as well as 'crowding out' behavior, in which gains in quality in one area may simply occur at the expense of quality of care in another. Patient preferences may not always match specific quality improvement measures. Unintended effects for patients may include decreased patient satisfaction, trust, or confidence in their provider. Summary: Recognition and anticipation of the possible unintended consequences of guideline implementation is a critical step to harnessing all the benefits of quality improvement in practice.",
keywords = "Asthma, Clinical practice guidelines, Pay for performance, Quality improvement, Unintended consequences",
author = "Bardach, {Naomi S.} and Cabana, {Michael D.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283329937",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "777--782",
journal = "Current Opinion in Pediatrics",
issn = "1040-8703",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The unintended consequences of quality improvement

AU - Bardach, Naomi S.

AU - Cabana, Michael D.

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - Purpose of review: The focus on quality improvement has led to several types of initiatives in pediatric care; however, these programs may lead to potential unintended consequences. Recent findings: Unintended consequences of quality improvement programs that have been described are reviewed. Unintended effects on resource utilization include effects on costs, as well as the inability to apply programs across different populations and affect disparities in care. Unintended effects on provider behavior include measurement fixation behavior, as well as 'crowding out' behavior, in which gains in quality in one area may simply occur at the expense of quality of care in another. Patient preferences may not always match specific quality improvement measures. Unintended effects for patients may include decreased patient satisfaction, trust, or confidence in their provider. Summary: Recognition and anticipation of the possible unintended consequences of guideline implementation is a critical step to harnessing all the benefits of quality improvement in practice.

AB - Purpose of review: The focus on quality improvement has led to several types of initiatives in pediatric care; however, these programs may lead to potential unintended consequences. Recent findings: Unintended consequences of quality improvement programs that have been described are reviewed. Unintended effects on resource utilization include effects on costs, as well as the inability to apply programs across different populations and affect disparities in care. Unintended effects on provider behavior include measurement fixation behavior, as well as 'crowding out' behavior, in which gains in quality in one area may simply occur at the expense of quality of care in another. Patient preferences may not always match specific quality improvement measures. Unintended effects for patients may include decreased patient satisfaction, trust, or confidence in their provider. Summary: Recognition and anticipation of the possible unintended consequences of guideline implementation is a critical step to harnessing all the benefits of quality improvement in practice.

KW - Asthma

KW - Clinical practice guidelines

KW - Pay for performance

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Unintended consequences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74549172018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74549172018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283329937

DO - 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283329937

M3 - Review article

C2 - 19773653

AN - SCOPUS:74549172018

VL - 21

SP - 777

EP - 782

JO - Current Opinion in Pediatrics

JF - Current Opinion in Pediatrics

SN - 1040-8703

IS - 6

ER -