The role of EEG in the diagnosis and classification of the epilepsy syndromes

a tool for clinical practice by the ILAE Neurophysiology Task Force (Part 1)

Michalis Koutroumanidis, Alexis Arzimanoglou, Roberto Caraballo, Sushma Goyal, Anna Kaminska, Pramote Laoprasert, Hirokazu Oguni, Guido Rubboli, William Tatum, Pierre Thomas, Eugen Trinka, Luca Vignatelli, Solomon L. Moshe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rational. The concept of epilepsy syndromes, introduced in 1989, was defined as “clusters of signs and symptoms customarily occurring together”. Definition of epilepsy syndromes based on electro-clinical features facilitated clinical practice and, whenever possible, clinical research in homogeneous groups of patients with epilepsies. Progress in the fields of neuroimaging and genetics made it rapidly clear that, although crucial, the electro-clinical description of epilepsy syndromes was not sufficient to allow much needed development of targeted therapies and a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of seizures. The 2017 ILAE position paper on Classification of the Epilepsies recognized that “as a critical tool for the practicing clinician, epilepsy classification must be relevant and dynamic to changes in thinking”. The concept of “epilepsy syndromes” evolved, incorporating issues related to aetiologies and comorbidities. A comprehensive update (and revision where necessary) of the EEG diagnostic criteria in the light of the 2017 revised terminology and concepts was deemed necessary. Methods. The work was commissioned by the Neurophysiology Task Force of the ILAE Committee on the Diagnostic Methods. Diagnostic criteria and recording procedures were developed by group consensus, reached through an “informal”, internal decision-making process. Each working group member was allocated a number of syndromes, and a standard structured template was used. International literature was extensively reviewed. Results. We developed a simple diagnostic system that is applicable to all epilepsy syndromes which allows the physician (i) to rate the strength of EEG diagnosis (degree of diagnostic certainty) by weighting EEG findings in relation to the available clinical information or the specific clinical question, and ii) to suggest further EEG diagnostics where conclusive diagnostic evidence is lacking. We also propose a system of syndrome-specific recording protocols that, used with the relevant clinical presentation or specific clinical question, may maximize activation of epileptic discharges and ultimately help with standardization of EEG recording across departments, worldwide. Because recording methodology also depends on available resources, a two-tier system was developed to embrace clinical EEG services in resource-limited and industrialized countries. A clinical practice statement for each of the epilepsy syndromes discussed underscores the crucial role of the clinical information with regards to both the optimization of the EEG recording and mainly its meaningful interpretation. Part I covers Genetic (Idiopathic) generalized epilepsies and syndromes, Reflex epilepsies, structural and genetic focal (lobar) syndromes and Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsies [Published with educational EEG plates on www.epilepticdisorders.com].

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-298
Number of pages66
JournalEpileptic Disorders
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Neurophysiology
Advisory Committees
Electroencephalography
Epilepsy
Progressive Myoclonic Epilepsy
Reflex Epilepsy
Developed Countries
Terminology
Neuroimaging
Signs and Symptoms
Comorbidity
Consensus
Decision Making
Seizures
Physicians

Keywords

  • EEG and epilepsy diagnosis
  • EEG protocols
  • epilepsy syndromes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

The role of EEG in the diagnosis and classification of the epilepsy syndromes : a tool for clinical practice by the ILAE Neurophysiology Task Force (Part 1). / Koutroumanidis, Michalis; Arzimanoglou, Alexis; Caraballo, Roberto; Goyal, Sushma; Kaminska, Anna; Laoprasert, Pramote; Oguni, Hirokazu; Rubboli, Guido; Tatum, William; Thomas, Pierre; Trinka, Eugen; Vignatelli, Luca; Moshe, Solomon L.

In: Epileptic Disorders, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.09.2017, p. 233-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Koutroumanidis, M, Arzimanoglou, A, Caraballo, R, Goyal, S, Kaminska, A, Laoprasert, P, Oguni, H, Rubboli, G, Tatum, W, Thomas, P, Trinka, E, Vignatelli, L & Moshe, SL 2017, 'The role of EEG in the diagnosis and classification of the epilepsy syndromes: a tool for clinical practice by the ILAE Neurophysiology Task Force (Part 1)', Epileptic Disorders, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 233-298. https://doi.org/10.1684/epd.2017.0935
Koutroumanidis, Michalis ; Arzimanoglou, Alexis ; Caraballo, Roberto ; Goyal, Sushma ; Kaminska, Anna ; Laoprasert, Pramote ; Oguni, Hirokazu ; Rubboli, Guido ; Tatum, William ; Thomas, Pierre ; Trinka, Eugen ; Vignatelli, Luca ; Moshe, Solomon L. / The role of EEG in the diagnosis and classification of the epilepsy syndromes : a tool for clinical practice by the ILAE Neurophysiology Task Force (Part 1). In: Epileptic Disorders. 2017 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 233-298.
@article{a4f58222ee3445d594c4eb5e2558c5aa,
title = "The role of EEG in the diagnosis and classification of the epilepsy syndromes: a tool for clinical practice by the ILAE Neurophysiology Task Force (Part 1)",
abstract = "Rational. The concept of epilepsy syndromes, introduced in 1989, was defined as “clusters of signs and symptoms customarily occurring together”. Definition of epilepsy syndromes based on electro-clinical features facilitated clinical practice and, whenever possible, clinical research in homogeneous groups of patients with epilepsies. Progress in the fields of neuroimaging and genetics made it rapidly clear that, although crucial, the electro-clinical description of epilepsy syndromes was not sufficient to allow much needed development of targeted therapies and a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of seizures. The 2017 ILAE position paper on Classification of the Epilepsies recognized that “as a critical tool for the practicing clinician, epilepsy classification must be relevant and dynamic to changes in thinking”. The concept of “epilepsy syndromes” evolved, incorporating issues related to aetiologies and comorbidities. A comprehensive update (and revision where necessary) of the EEG diagnostic criteria in the light of the 2017 revised terminology and concepts was deemed necessary. Methods. The work was commissioned by the Neurophysiology Task Force of the ILAE Committee on the Diagnostic Methods. Diagnostic criteria and recording procedures were developed by group consensus, reached through an “informal”, internal decision-making process. Each working group member was allocated a number of syndromes, and a standard structured template was used. International literature was extensively reviewed. Results. We developed a simple diagnostic system that is applicable to all epilepsy syndromes which allows the physician (i) to rate the strength of EEG diagnosis (degree of diagnostic certainty) by weighting EEG findings in relation to the available clinical information or the specific clinical question, and ii) to suggest further EEG diagnostics where conclusive diagnostic evidence is lacking. We also propose a system of syndrome-specific recording protocols that, used with the relevant clinical presentation or specific clinical question, may maximize activation of epileptic discharges and ultimately help with standardization of EEG recording across departments, worldwide. Because recording methodology also depends on available resources, a two-tier system was developed to embrace clinical EEG services in resource-limited and industrialized countries. A clinical practice statement for each of the epilepsy syndromes discussed underscores the crucial role of the clinical information with regards to both the optimization of the EEG recording and mainly its meaningful interpretation. Part I covers Genetic (Idiopathic) generalized epilepsies and syndromes, Reflex epilepsies, structural and genetic focal (lobar) syndromes and Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsies [Published with educational EEG plates on www.epilepticdisorders.com].",
keywords = "EEG and epilepsy diagnosis, EEG protocols, epilepsy syndromes",
author = "Michalis Koutroumanidis and Alexis Arzimanoglou and Roberto Caraballo and Sushma Goyal and Anna Kaminska and Pramote Laoprasert and Hirokazu Oguni and Guido Rubboli and William Tatum and Pierre Thomas and Eugen Trinka and Luca Vignatelli and Moshe, {Solomon L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1684/epd.2017.0935",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "233--298",
journal = "Epileptic Disorders",
issn = "1294-9361",
publisher = "Springer Paris",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of EEG in the diagnosis and classification of the epilepsy syndromes

T2 - a tool for clinical practice by the ILAE Neurophysiology Task Force (Part 1)

AU - Koutroumanidis, Michalis

AU - Arzimanoglou, Alexis

AU - Caraballo, Roberto

AU - Goyal, Sushma

AU - Kaminska, Anna

AU - Laoprasert, Pramote

AU - Oguni, Hirokazu

AU - Rubboli, Guido

AU - Tatum, William

AU - Thomas, Pierre

AU - Trinka, Eugen

AU - Vignatelli, Luca

AU - Moshe, Solomon L.

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Rational. The concept of epilepsy syndromes, introduced in 1989, was defined as “clusters of signs and symptoms customarily occurring together”. Definition of epilepsy syndromes based on electro-clinical features facilitated clinical practice and, whenever possible, clinical research in homogeneous groups of patients with epilepsies. Progress in the fields of neuroimaging and genetics made it rapidly clear that, although crucial, the electro-clinical description of epilepsy syndromes was not sufficient to allow much needed development of targeted therapies and a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of seizures. The 2017 ILAE position paper on Classification of the Epilepsies recognized that “as a critical tool for the practicing clinician, epilepsy classification must be relevant and dynamic to changes in thinking”. The concept of “epilepsy syndromes” evolved, incorporating issues related to aetiologies and comorbidities. A comprehensive update (and revision where necessary) of the EEG diagnostic criteria in the light of the 2017 revised terminology and concepts was deemed necessary. Methods. The work was commissioned by the Neurophysiology Task Force of the ILAE Committee on the Diagnostic Methods. Diagnostic criteria and recording procedures were developed by group consensus, reached through an “informal”, internal decision-making process. Each working group member was allocated a number of syndromes, and a standard structured template was used. International literature was extensively reviewed. Results. We developed a simple diagnostic system that is applicable to all epilepsy syndromes which allows the physician (i) to rate the strength of EEG diagnosis (degree of diagnostic certainty) by weighting EEG findings in relation to the available clinical information or the specific clinical question, and ii) to suggest further EEG diagnostics where conclusive diagnostic evidence is lacking. We also propose a system of syndrome-specific recording protocols that, used with the relevant clinical presentation or specific clinical question, may maximize activation of epileptic discharges and ultimately help with standardization of EEG recording across departments, worldwide. Because recording methodology also depends on available resources, a two-tier system was developed to embrace clinical EEG services in resource-limited and industrialized countries. A clinical practice statement for each of the epilepsy syndromes discussed underscores the crucial role of the clinical information with regards to both the optimization of the EEG recording and mainly its meaningful interpretation. Part I covers Genetic (Idiopathic) generalized epilepsies and syndromes, Reflex epilepsies, structural and genetic focal (lobar) syndromes and Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsies [Published with educational EEG plates on www.epilepticdisorders.com].

AB - Rational. The concept of epilepsy syndromes, introduced in 1989, was defined as “clusters of signs and symptoms customarily occurring together”. Definition of epilepsy syndromes based on electro-clinical features facilitated clinical practice and, whenever possible, clinical research in homogeneous groups of patients with epilepsies. Progress in the fields of neuroimaging and genetics made it rapidly clear that, although crucial, the electro-clinical description of epilepsy syndromes was not sufficient to allow much needed development of targeted therapies and a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of seizures. The 2017 ILAE position paper on Classification of the Epilepsies recognized that “as a critical tool for the practicing clinician, epilepsy classification must be relevant and dynamic to changes in thinking”. The concept of “epilepsy syndromes” evolved, incorporating issues related to aetiologies and comorbidities. A comprehensive update (and revision where necessary) of the EEG diagnostic criteria in the light of the 2017 revised terminology and concepts was deemed necessary. Methods. The work was commissioned by the Neurophysiology Task Force of the ILAE Committee on the Diagnostic Methods. Diagnostic criteria and recording procedures were developed by group consensus, reached through an “informal”, internal decision-making process. Each working group member was allocated a number of syndromes, and a standard structured template was used. International literature was extensively reviewed. Results. We developed a simple diagnostic system that is applicable to all epilepsy syndromes which allows the physician (i) to rate the strength of EEG diagnosis (degree of diagnostic certainty) by weighting EEG findings in relation to the available clinical information or the specific clinical question, and ii) to suggest further EEG diagnostics where conclusive diagnostic evidence is lacking. We also propose a system of syndrome-specific recording protocols that, used with the relevant clinical presentation or specific clinical question, may maximize activation of epileptic discharges and ultimately help with standardization of EEG recording across departments, worldwide. Because recording methodology also depends on available resources, a two-tier system was developed to embrace clinical EEG services in resource-limited and industrialized countries. A clinical practice statement for each of the epilepsy syndromes discussed underscores the crucial role of the clinical information with regards to both the optimization of the EEG recording and mainly its meaningful interpretation. Part I covers Genetic (Idiopathic) generalized epilepsies and syndromes, Reflex epilepsies, structural and genetic focal (lobar) syndromes and Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsies [Published with educational EEG plates on www.epilepticdisorders.com].

KW - EEG and epilepsy diagnosis

KW - EEG protocols

KW - epilepsy syndromes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033241330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033241330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1684/epd.2017.0935

DO - 10.1684/epd.2017.0935

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 233

EP - 298

JO - Epileptic Disorders

JF - Epileptic Disorders

SN - 1294-9361

IS - 3

ER -