The rhinology experience in otolaryngology residency: A survey of chief residents

Abtin Tabaee, Vijay K. Anand, Michael G. Stewart, Marvin P. Fried

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The development of rhinology as a distinct subspecialty is based on recent advances in the research, clinical, and surgical aspects of the field. The impact of this evolution on the rhinologic experience in otolaryngology residency programs is not currently understood. METHODS: An anonymous, web-based survey of chief residents in otolaryngology residency programs was performed. Participants were asked to rate their residency experience in rhinology in terms of didactics, research opportunities, mentorship availability, clinical care, and surgical experience on an ordinal 5-point Likert scale with higher scores representing more favorable responses. RESULTS: Forty-eight respondents completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 17.6%. The overall experience in rhinology was reported as positive (4.3 points). The individual items with statistically lower scores included availability of basic science research (P = .04), comfort level with the medical management of unusual rhinologic issues (P = .0006), and comfort level with advanced sinus procedures (P < .0001). However, overall ratings were high, and even the poorer-scoring items were still rated favorably. In programs with rhinology fellowships, basic science opportunities were reported as being higher (P = .04) than programs without fellowships. There were no other statistically significant differences in programs with rhinology fellowships. There was no correlation between responses and future career choice. CONCLUSION: The overall residency training experience in rhinology appears to be positive, and presence of a rhinology fellowship appears not to have a negative impact on resident rhinologic training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1072-1075
Number of pages4
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume118
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008

Fingerprint

Otolaryngology
Internship and Residency
Research
Career Choice
Mentors
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Endoscopic sinus surgery
  • Otolaryngology
  • Residency education
  • Rhinology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

The rhinology experience in otolaryngology residency : A survey of chief residents. / Tabaee, Abtin; Anand, Vijay K.; Stewart, Michael G.; Fried, Marvin P.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 118, No. 6, 06.2008, p. 1072-1075.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tabaee, Abtin ; Anand, Vijay K. ; Stewart, Michael G. ; Fried, Marvin P. / The rhinology experience in otolaryngology residency : A survey of chief residents. In: Laryngoscope. 2008 ; Vol. 118, No. 6. pp. 1072-1075.
@article{da0c8f270044418abb56df7677950498,
title = "The rhinology experience in otolaryngology residency: A survey of chief residents",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: The development of rhinology as a distinct subspecialty is based on recent advances in the research, clinical, and surgical aspects of the field. The impact of this evolution on the rhinologic experience in otolaryngology residency programs is not currently understood. METHODS: An anonymous, web-based survey of chief residents in otolaryngology residency programs was performed. Participants were asked to rate their residency experience in rhinology in terms of didactics, research opportunities, mentorship availability, clinical care, and surgical experience on an ordinal 5-point Likert scale with higher scores representing more favorable responses. RESULTS: Forty-eight respondents completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 17.6{\%}. The overall experience in rhinology was reported as positive (4.3 points). The individual items with statistically lower scores included availability of basic science research (P = .04), comfort level with the medical management of unusual rhinologic issues (P = .0006), and comfort level with advanced sinus procedures (P < .0001). However, overall ratings were high, and even the poorer-scoring items were still rated favorably. In programs with rhinology fellowships, basic science opportunities were reported as being higher (P = .04) than programs without fellowships. There were no other statistically significant differences in programs with rhinology fellowships. There was no correlation between responses and future career choice. CONCLUSION: The overall residency training experience in rhinology appears to be positive, and presence of a rhinology fellowship appears not to have a negative impact on resident rhinologic training.",
keywords = "Endoscopic sinus surgery, Otolaryngology, Residency education, Rhinology",
author = "Abtin Tabaee and Anand, {Vijay K.} and Stewart, {Michael G.} and Fried, {Marvin P.}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1097/MLG.0b013e31816b308e",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "118",
pages = "1072--1075",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The rhinology experience in otolaryngology residency

T2 - A survey of chief residents

AU - Tabaee, Abtin

AU - Anand, Vijay K.

AU - Stewart, Michael G.

AU - Fried, Marvin P.

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - OBJECTIVES: The development of rhinology as a distinct subspecialty is based on recent advances in the research, clinical, and surgical aspects of the field. The impact of this evolution on the rhinologic experience in otolaryngology residency programs is not currently understood. METHODS: An anonymous, web-based survey of chief residents in otolaryngology residency programs was performed. Participants were asked to rate their residency experience in rhinology in terms of didactics, research opportunities, mentorship availability, clinical care, and surgical experience on an ordinal 5-point Likert scale with higher scores representing more favorable responses. RESULTS: Forty-eight respondents completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 17.6%. The overall experience in rhinology was reported as positive (4.3 points). The individual items with statistically lower scores included availability of basic science research (P = .04), comfort level with the medical management of unusual rhinologic issues (P = .0006), and comfort level with advanced sinus procedures (P < .0001). However, overall ratings were high, and even the poorer-scoring items were still rated favorably. In programs with rhinology fellowships, basic science opportunities were reported as being higher (P = .04) than programs without fellowships. There were no other statistically significant differences in programs with rhinology fellowships. There was no correlation between responses and future career choice. CONCLUSION: The overall residency training experience in rhinology appears to be positive, and presence of a rhinology fellowship appears not to have a negative impact on resident rhinologic training.

AB - OBJECTIVES: The development of rhinology as a distinct subspecialty is based on recent advances in the research, clinical, and surgical aspects of the field. The impact of this evolution on the rhinologic experience in otolaryngology residency programs is not currently understood. METHODS: An anonymous, web-based survey of chief residents in otolaryngology residency programs was performed. Participants were asked to rate their residency experience in rhinology in terms of didactics, research opportunities, mentorship availability, clinical care, and surgical experience on an ordinal 5-point Likert scale with higher scores representing more favorable responses. RESULTS: Forty-eight respondents completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 17.6%. The overall experience in rhinology was reported as positive (4.3 points). The individual items with statistically lower scores included availability of basic science research (P = .04), comfort level with the medical management of unusual rhinologic issues (P = .0006), and comfort level with advanced sinus procedures (P < .0001). However, overall ratings were high, and even the poorer-scoring items were still rated favorably. In programs with rhinology fellowships, basic science opportunities were reported as being higher (P = .04) than programs without fellowships. There were no other statistically significant differences in programs with rhinology fellowships. There was no correlation between responses and future career choice. CONCLUSION: The overall residency training experience in rhinology appears to be positive, and presence of a rhinology fellowship appears not to have a negative impact on resident rhinologic training.

KW - Endoscopic sinus surgery

KW - Otolaryngology

KW - Residency education

KW - Rhinology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44649145884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44649145884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31816b308e

DO - 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31816b308e

M3 - Article

C2 - 18354334

AN - SCOPUS:44649145884

VL - 118

SP - 1072

EP - 1075

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 6

ER -