The rational choice model in family decision making at the end of life.

Alison Karasz, Galit Sacajiu, Misha Kogan, Liza Watkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Most end-of-life decisions are made by family members. Current ethical guidelines for family decision making are based on a hierarchical model that emphasizes the patient's wishes over his or her best interests. Evidence suggests that the model poorly reflects the strategies and priorities of many families. Researchers observed and recorded 26 decision-making meetings between hospital staff and family members. Semi-structured follow-up interviews were conducted. Transcriptions were analyzed using qualitative techniques. For both staff and families, consideration of a patient's best interests generally took priority over the patient's wishes. Staff generally introduced discussion of the patient's wishes for rhetorical purposes, such as persuasion. Competing moral frameworks, which de-emphasized the salience of patients' autonomy and "right to choose," played a role in family decision making. The priority given to the patients' wishes in the hierarchical model does not reflect the priorities of staff and families in making decisions about end-of-life care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-200
Number of pages12
JournalThe Journal of clinical ethics
Volume21
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The rational choice model in family decision making at the end of life.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this