The national MD-PhD program outcomes study: Outcomes variation by sex, race, and ethnicity

Myles H. Akabas, Lawrence F. Brass

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2015, a nation-wide effort was launched to track the careers of over 10,000 MD-PhD program graduates. Data were obtained by surveys sent to alumni, inquiries sent to program directors, and searches in American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) databases. Here, we present an analysis of the data, focusing on the impact of sex, race, and ethnicity on career outcomes. The results show that diversity among trainees has increased since the earliest MD-PhD programs, although it still lags considerably behind the US population. Training duration, which includes time to graduation as well as time to first independent position, was similar for men and women and for minority and nonminority alumni, as were most choices of medical specialties. Regardless of minority status and sex, most survey responders reported that they are working in academia, research institutes, federal agencies, or industry. These similarities were, however, accompanied by several noteworthy differences: (a) Based on AAMC Faculty Roster data rather than survey responses, women were less likely than men to have had a full-time faculty appointment, (b) minorities who graduated after 1985 had a longer average time to degree than nonminorities, (c) fewer women and minorities have NIH grants, (d) fewer women reported success in moving from a mentored to an independent NIH award, and (e) women in the most recent graduation cohort reported spending less time on research than men. Collectively, these results suggest that additional efforts need to be made to recruit women and minorities into MD-PhD programs and, once recruited, to understand the drivers behind the differences that have emerged in their career paths.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere133010
JournalJCI Insight
Volume4
Issue number19
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Medical Faculties
Organized Financing
American Medical Association
Appointments and Schedules
Industry
Medicine
Databases
Research
Population
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The national MD-PhD program outcomes study : Outcomes variation by sex, race, and ethnicity. / Akabas, Myles H.; Brass, Lawrence F.

In: JCI Insight, Vol. 4, No. 19, e133010, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{87c1b774346f4b9c9c9bd01ad21bcf1f,
title = "The national MD-PhD program outcomes study: Outcomes variation by sex, race, and ethnicity",
abstract = "In 2015, a nation-wide effort was launched to track the careers of over 10,000 MD-PhD program graduates. Data were obtained by surveys sent to alumni, inquiries sent to program directors, and searches in American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) databases. Here, we present an analysis of the data, focusing on the impact of sex, race, and ethnicity on career outcomes. The results show that diversity among trainees has increased since the earliest MD-PhD programs, although it still lags considerably behind the US population. Training duration, which includes time to graduation as well as time to first independent position, was similar for men and women and for minority and nonminority alumni, as were most choices of medical specialties. Regardless of minority status and sex, most survey responders reported that they are working in academia, research institutes, federal agencies, or industry. These similarities were, however, accompanied by several noteworthy differences: (a) Based on AAMC Faculty Roster data rather than survey responses, women were less likely than men to have had a full-time faculty appointment, (b) minorities who graduated after 1985 had a longer average time to degree than nonminorities, (c) fewer women and minorities have NIH grants, (d) fewer women reported success in moving from a mentored to an independent NIH award, and (e) women in the most recent graduation cohort reported spending less time on research than men. Collectively, these results suggest that additional efforts need to be made to recruit women and minorities into MD-PhD programs and, once recruited, to understand the drivers behind the differences that have emerged in their career paths.",
author = "Akabas, {Myles H.} and Brass, {Lawrence F.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1172/jci.insight.133010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
journal = "JCI insight",
issn = "2379-3708",
publisher = "The American Society for Clinical Investigation",
number = "19",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The national MD-PhD program outcomes study

T2 - Outcomes variation by sex, race, and ethnicity

AU - Akabas, Myles H.

AU - Brass, Lawrence F.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - In 2015, a nation-wide effort was launched to track the careers of over 10,000 MD-PhD program graduates. Data were obtained by surveys sent to alumni, inquiries sent to program directors, and searches in American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) databases. Here, we present an analysis of the data, focusing on the impact of sex, race, and ethnicity on career outcomes. The results show that diversity among trainees has increased since the earliest MD-PhD programs, although it still lags considerably behind the US population. Training duration, which includes time to graduation as well as time to first independent position, was similar for men and women and for minority and nonminority alumni, as were most choices of medical specialties. Regardless of minority status and sex, most survey responders reported that they are working in academia, research institutes, federal agencies, or industry. These similarities were, however, accompanied by several noteworthy differences: (a) Based on AAMC Faculty Roster data rather than survey responses, women were less likely than men to have had a full-time faculty appointment, (b) minorities who graduated after 1985 had a longer average time to degree than nonminorities, (c) fewer women and minorities have NIH grants, (d) fewer women reported success in moving from a mentored to an independent NIH award, and (e) women in the most recent graduation cohort reported spending less time on research than men. Collectively, these results suggest that additional efforts need to be made to recruit women and minorities into MD-PhD programs and, once recruited, to understand the drivers behind the differences that have emerged in their career paths.

AB - In 2015, a nation-wide effort was launched to track the careers of over 10,000 MD-PhD program graduates. Data were obtained by surveys sent to alumni, inquiries sent to program directors, and searches in American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) databases. Here, we present an analysis of the data, focusing on the impact of sex, race, and ethnicity on career outcomes. The results show that diversity among trainees has increased since the earliest MD-PhD programs, although it still lags considerably behind the US population. Training duration, which includes time to graduation as well as time to first independent position, was similar for men and women and for minority and nonminority alumni, as were most choices of medical specialties. Regardless of minority status and sex, most survey responders reported that they are working in academia, research institutes, federal agencies, or industry. These similarities were, however, accompanied by several noteworthy differences: (a) Based on AAMC Faculty Roster data rather than survey responses, women were less likely than men to have had a full-time faculty appointment, (b) minorities who graduated after 1985 had a longer average time to degree than nonminorities, (c) fewer women and minorities have NIH grants, (d) fewer women reported success in moving from a mentored to an independent NIH award, and (e) women in the most recent graduation cohort reported spending less time on research than men. Collectively, these results suggest that additional efforts need to be made to recruit women and minorities into MD-PhD programs and, once recruited, to understand the drivers behind the differences that have emerged in their career paths.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073062754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073062754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1172/jci.insight.133010

DO - 10.1172/jci.insight.133010

M3 - Review article

C2 - 31578303

AN - SCOPUS:85073062754

VL - 4

JO - JCI insight

JF - JCI insight

SN - 2379-3708

IS - 19

M1 - e133010

ER -