The labor curve of the grand multipara

Does progress of labor continue to improve with additional childbearing?

Edith D. Gurewitsch Allen, Paul Diament, Jill Fong, Guan Hua Huang, Aron Popovtzer, Daniel Weinstein, Frank A. Chervenak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to test the hypothesis that progress of labor slows as parity exceeds 4 by comparing labor curves of grand multiparous women (para 5 and over) (GMs) with those of nulliparous and lower-parity multiparous women. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohorts of spontaneously laboring, vertex-presenting, term GMs who were admitted to two medical centers during the period from January 1990 through June 1995 were randomly computer-matched to a nulliparous and a lower-parity multiparous control subject, matched for age, hospital, and year of delivery. Cervical examination data were graphed retrospectively from the time of full dilatation. Curves were compared by pairwise likelihood ratio tests, by using a random effects model to adjust for obstetric interventions, with significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: Pregnancies in 1095 GMs, 1174 lower-parity multiparous women, and 908 nulliparous women were studied. GMs exhibit a longer initial phase of labor than either nulliparous women or lower-parity multiparous women, begin to dilate rapidly at a greater dilatation than nulliparous women, and experience acceleration of labor at a rate no faster than lower-parity multiparous women. The average labor curve of GMs resembles that of nulliparous women before dilatation of 4 cm is attained, then transitions to the typical curve of the lower-parity multiparous women until dilatation of 6 cm is attained and thereafter is indistinguishable from that of the lower-parity multiparous women (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Once parity exceeds 4, progress of labor slows. "Poor progress" beyond dilatation of 4 cm should not be considered abnormal for a GM, because she is likely still in the latent phase until dilatation of 6 cm is attained. Nor should she be expected to progress through her active phase any faster than lower-parity multiparous women.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1331-1338
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume186
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Parity
Dilatation
Obstetrics
Pregnancy

Keywords

  • Cervical dilatation
  • Grand multiparity
  • Labor curves
  • Labor progress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

The labor curve of the grand multipara : Does progress of labor continue to improve with additional childbearing? / Gurewitsch Allen, Edith D.; Diament, Paul; Fong, Jill; Huang, Guan Hua; Popovtzer, Aron; Weinstein, Daniel; Chervenak, Frank A.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 186, No. 6, 01.01.2002, p. 1331-1338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gurewitsch Allen, Edith D. ; Diament, Paul ; Fong, Jill ; Huang, Guan Hua ; Popovtzer, Aron ; Weinstein, Daniel ; Chervenak, Frank A. / The labor curve of the grand multipara : Does progress of labor continue to improve with additional childbearing?. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002 ; Vol. 186, No. 6. pp. 1331-1338.
@article{16f35dd4f44b422387eb1fb31cebf184,
title = "The labor curve of the grand multipara: Does progress of labor continue to improve with additional childbearing?",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to test the hypothesis that progress of labor slows as parity exceeds 4 by comparing labor curves of grand multiparous women (para 5 and over) (GMs) with those of nulliparous and lower-parity multiparous women. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohorts of spontaneously laboring, vertex-presenting, term GMs who were admitted to two medical centers during the period from January 1990 through June 1995 were randomly computer-matched to a nulliparous and a lower-parity multiparous control subject, matched for age, hospital, and year of delivery. Cervical examination data were graphed retrospectively from the time of full dilatation. Curves were compared by pairwise likelihood ratio tests, by using a random effects model to adjust for obstetric interventions, with significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: Pregnancies in 1095 GMs, 1174 lower-parity multiparous women, and 908 nulliparous women were studied. GMs exhibit a longer initial phase of labor than either nulliparous women or lower-parity multiparous women, begin to dilate rapidly at a greater dilatation than nulliparous women, and experience acceleration of labor at a rate no faster than lower-parity multiparous women. The average labor curve of GMs resembles that of nulliparous women before dilatation of 4 cm is attained, then transitions to the typical curve of the lower-parity multiparous women until dilatation of 6 cm is attained and thereafter is indistinguishable from that of the lower-parity multiparous women (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Once parity exceeds 4, progress of labor slows. {"}Poor progress{"} beyond dilatation of 4 cm should not be considered abnormal for a GM, because she is likely still in the latent phase until dilatation of 6 cm is attained. Nor should she be expected to progress through her active phase any faster than lower-parity multiparous women.",
keywords = "Cervical dilatation, Grand multiparity, Labor curves, Labor progress",
author = "{Gurewitsch Allen}, {Edith D.} and Paul Diament and Jill Fong and Huang, {Guan Hua} and Aron Popovtzer and Daniel Weinstein and Chervenak, {Frank A.}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1067/mob.2002.122448a",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "186",
pages = "1331--1338",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The labor curve of the grand multipara

T2 - Does progress of labor continue to improve with additional childbearing?

AU - Gurewitsch Allen, Edith D.

AU - Diament, Paul

AU - Fong, Jill

AU - Huang, Guan Hua

AU - Popovtzer, Aron

AU - Weinstein, Daniel

AU - Chervenak, Frank A.

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to test the hypothesis that progress of labor slows as parity exceeds 4 by comparing labor curves of grand multiparous women (para 5 and over) (GMs) with those of nulliparous and lower-parity multiparous women. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohorts of spontaneously laboring, vertex-presenting, term GMs who were admitted to two medical centers during the period from January 1990 through June 1995 were randomly computer-matched to a nulliparous and a lower-parity multiparous control subject, matched for age, hospital, and year of delivery. Cervical examination data were graphed retrospectively from the time of full dilatation. Curves were compared by pairwise likelihood ratio tests, by using a random effects model to adjust for obstetric interventions, with significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: Pregnancies in 1095 GMs, 1174 lower-parity multiparous women, and 908 nulliparous women were studied. GMs exhibit a longer initial phase of labor than either nulliparous women or lower-parity multiparous women, begin to dilate rapidly at a greater dilatation than nulliparous women, and experience acceleration of labor at a rate no faster than lower-parity multiparous women. The average labor curve of GMs resembles that of nulliparous women before dilatation of 4 cm is attained, then transitions to the typical curve of the lower-parity multiparous women until dilatation of 6 cm is attained and thereafter is indistinguishable from that of the lower-parity multiparous women (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Once parity exceeds 4, progress of labor slows. "Poor progress" beyond dilatation of 4 cm should not be considered abnormal for a GM, because she is likely still in the latent phase until dilatation of 6 cm is attained. Nor should she be expected to progress through her active phase any faster than lower-parity multiparous women.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to test the hypothesis that progress of labor slows as parity exceeds 4 by comparing labor curves of grand multiparous women (para 5 and over) (GMs) with those of nulliparous and lower-parity multiparous women. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohorts of spontaneously laboring, vertex-presenting, term GMs who were admitted to two medical centers during the period from January 1990 through June 1995 were randomly computer-matched to a nulliparous and a lower-parity multiparous control subject, matched for age, hospital, and year of delivery. Cervical examination data were graphed retrospectively from the time of full dilatation. Curves were compared by pairwise likelihood ratio tests, by using a random effects model to adjust for obstetric interventions, with significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: Pregnancies in 1095 GMs, 1174 lower-parity multiparous women, and 908 nulliparous women were studied. GMs exhibit a longer initial phase of labor than either nulliparous women or lower-parity multiparous women, begin to dilate rapidly at a greater dilatation than nulliparous women, and experience acceleration of labor at a rate no faster than lower-parity multiparous women. The average labor curve of GMs resembles that of nulliparous women before dilatation of 4 cm is attained, then transitions to the typical curve of the lower-parity multiparous women until dilatation of 6 cm is attained and thereafter is indistinguishable from that of the lower-parity multiparous women (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Once parity exceeds 4, progress of labor slows. "Poor progress" beyond dilatation of 4 cm should not be considered abnormal for a GM, because she is likely still in the latent phase until dilatation of 6 cm is attained. Nor should she be expected to progress through her active phase any faster than lower-parity multiparous women.

KW - Cervical dilatation

KW - Grand multiparity

KW - Labor curves

KW - Labor progress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036085365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036085365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1067/mob.2002.122448a

DO - 10.1067/mob.2002.122448a

M3 - Article

VL - 186

SP - 1331

EP - 1338

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 6

ER -