The king's foot of patient-reported outcomes: Current practices and new developments for the measurement of change

Richard J. Swartz, Carolyn Schwartz, Ethan Basch, Li Cai, Diane L. Fairclough, Lori McLeod, Tito R. Mendoza, Bruce D. Rapkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Assessing change remains a challenge in patient-reported outcomes. In June 2009, a group of psychometricians, biostatisticians, and behavioral researchers from other disciplines convened as a Longitudinal Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes Working group as part of the Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute Summer Psychometric program to discuss the complex issues that arise when conceptualizing and operationalizing "change" in patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and related constructs. This white paper summarizes these issues and provides recommendations and possible paths for dealing with the complexities of measuring change. Methods/Results: This article presents and discusses issues associated with: (1) conceptualizing and operationalizing change in PRO measures; (2) modeling change using state-of-the-art statistical methods; (3) impediments to detecting true change; (4) new developments to deal with these challenges; and (5) important gaps that are fertile ground for future research. Conclusions: There was a consensus that important research still needs to be performed in order develop and refine high-quality PRO measures and statistical methods to analyze and model change in PRO constructs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1159-1167
Number of pages9
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume20
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2011

Fingerprint

Foot
Psychometrics
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Consensus
Research Personnel
Research

Keywords

  • Longitudinal studies
  • Outcome assessment (Health Care)
  • Psychometrics
  • Quality of life
  • Response shift
  • Statistical models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The king's foot of patient-reported outcomes : Current practices and new developments for the measurement of change. / Swartz, Richard J.; Schwartz, Carolyn; Basch, Ethan; Cai, Li; Fairclough, Diane L.; McLeod, Lori; Mendoza, Tito R.; Rapkin, Bruce D.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 20, No. 8, 10.2011, p. 1159-1167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Swartz, Richard J. ; Schwartz, Carolyn ; Basch, Ethan ; Cai, Li ; Fairclough, Diane L. ; McLeod, Lori ; Mendoza, Tito R. ; Rapkin, Bruce D. / The king's foot of patient-reported outcomes : Current practices and new developments for the measurement of change. In: Quality of Life Research. 2011 ; Vol. 20, No. 8. pp. 1159-1167.
@article{a163f9d693d84577a22d48149b19169b,
title = "The king's foot of patient-reported outcomes: Current practices and new developments for the measurement of change",
abstract = "Purpose: Assessing change remains a challenge in patient-reported outcomes. In June 2009, a group of psychometricians, biostatisticians, and behavioral researchers from other disciplines convened as a Longitudinal Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes Working group as part of the Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute Summer Psychometric program to discuss the complex issues that arise when conceptualizing and operationalizing {"}change{"} in patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and related constructs. This white paper summarizes these issues and provides recommendations and possible paths for dealing with the complexities of measuring change. Methods/Results: This article presents and discusses issues associated with: (1) conceptualizing and operationalizing change in PRO measures; (2) modeling change using state-of-the-art statistical methods; (3) impediments to detecting true change; (4) new developments to deal with these challenges; and (5) important gaps that are fertile ground for future research. Conclusions: There was a consensus that important research still needs to be performed in order develop and refine high-quality PRO measures and statistical methods to analyze and model change in PRO constructs.",
keywords = "Longitudinal studies, Outcome assessment (Health Care), Psychometrics, Quality of life, Response shift, Statistical models",
author = "Swartz, {Richard J.} and Carolyn Schwartz and Ethan Basch and Li Cai and Fairclough, {Diane L.} and Lori McLeod and Mendoza, {Tito R.} and Rapkin, {Bruce D.}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s11136-011-9863-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1159--1167",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The king's foot of patient-reported outcomes

T2 - Current practices and new developments for the measurement of change

AU - Swartz, Richard J.

AU - Schwartz, Carolyn

AU - Basch, Ethan

AU - Cai, Li

AU - Fairclough, Diane L.

AU - McLeod, Lori

AU - Mendoza, Tito R.

AU - Rapkin, Bruce D.

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - Purpose: Assessing change remains a challenge in patient-reported outcomes. In June 2009, a group of psychometricians, biostatisticians, and behavioral researchers from other disciplines convened as a Longitudinal Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes Working group as part of the Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute Summer Psychometric program to discuss the complex issues that arise when conceptualizing and operationalizing "change" in patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and related constructs. This white paper summarizes these issues and provides recommendations and possible paths for dealing with the complexities of measuring change. Methods/Results: This article presents and discusses issues associated with: (1) conceptualizing and operationalizing change in PRO measures; (2) modeling change using state-of-the-art statistical methods; (3) impediments to detecting true change; (4) new developments to deal with these challenges; and (5) important gaps that are fertile ground for future research. Conclusions: There was a consensus that important research still needs to be performed in order develop and refine high-quality PRO measures and statistical methods to analyze and model change in PRO constructs.

AB - Purpose: Assessing change remains a challenge in patient-reported outcomes. In June 2009, a group of psychometricians, biostatisticians, and behavioral researchers from other disciplines convened as a Longitudinal Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes Working group as part of the Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute Summer Psychometric program to discuss the complex issues that arise when conceptualizing and operationalizing "change" in patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and related constructs. This white paper summarizes these issues and provides recommendations and possible paths for dealing with the complexities of measuring change. Methods/Results: This article presents and discusses issues associated with: (1) conceptualizing and operationalizing change in PRO measures; (2) modeling change using state-of-the-art statistical methods; (3) impediments to detecting true change; (4) new developments to deal with these challenges; and (5) important gaps that are fertile ground for future research. Conclusions: There was a consensus that important research still needs to be performed in order develop and refine high-quality PRO measures and statistical methods to analyze and model change in PRO constructs.

KW - Longitudinal studies

KW - Outcome assessment (Health Care)

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Quality of life

KW - Response shift

KW - Statistical models

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053933801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053933801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-011-9863-1

DO - 10.1007/s11136-011-9863-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 21336659

AN - SCOPUS:80053933801

VL - 20

SP - 1159

EP - 1167

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 8

ER -