The influence of triage systems and triage scores on timeliness of ED analgesic administration

James Ducharme, Paula Tanabe, Peter Homel, James R. Miner, Andrew K. Chang, Jacques Lee, Knox H. Todd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine the association between triage scoring systems and triage priority scores on time to initial emergency department (ED) analgesic administration. Methods: An observational, multicenter, prospective, cohort study was conducted at 20 US and Canadian EDs. Centers from the United States used the Emergency Severity Index triage system or 1 of 3 unvalidated triage systems. Canadian centers used the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale. Patients aged 8 years or older who presented to the ED with a chief complaint of moderate to severe pain (>3 on a 10-point numerical rating scale) and who were ultimately discharged home were eligible for study enrollment. Triage score, triage system, pain rating on arrival, and time of initial analgesic administration were recorded. Results: Among 842 enrolled subjects, 506 (60%) received an analgesic while in the ED. Lower-acuity patients consistently waited longer for analgesics. On multivariate modeling, presenting pain intensity, total time spent in the ED, white ethnicity, and triage system were associated with time to initial analgesic administration. Emergency departments using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale triage system exhibited the lowest rates of analgesic use and displayed longer median times to initial analgesic administration. Conclusions: Although there were some differences between triage systems, all sites and systems demonstrated unacceptably long times to analgesic provision. Many patients with moderate to severe pain received no analgesic during their ED stay. Future studies should examine whether ED overcrowding impacts timeliness of analgesic administration and identify specific strategies to improve pain management practices in this challenging environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)867-873
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume26
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2008

Fingerprint

Triage
Analgesics
Hospital Emergency Service
Pain
Patient Acuity
Pain Management
Emergencies
Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Ducharme, J., Tanabe, P., Homel, P., Miner, J. R., Chang, A. K., Lee, J., & Todd, K. H. (2008). The influence of triage systems and triage scores on timeliness of ED analgesic administration. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 26(8), 867-873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2007.11.020

The influence of triage systems and triage scores on timeliness of ED analgesic administration. / Ducharme, James; Tanabe, Paula; Homel, Peter; Miner, James R.; Chang, Andrew K.; Lee, Jacques; Todd, Knox H.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 8, 10.2008, p. 867-873.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ducharme, James ; Tanabe, Paula ; Homel, Peter ; Miner, James R. ; Chang, Andrew K. ; Lee, Jacques ; Todd, Knox H. / The influence of triage systems and triage scores on timeliness of ED analgesic administration. In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 26, No. 8. pp. 867-873.
@article{7635864c97274d97b5c194b0ae10336d,
title = "The influence of triage systems and triage scores on timeliness of ED analgesic administration",
abstract = "Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine the association between triage scoring systems and triage priority scores on time to initial emergency department (ED) analgesic administration. Methods: An observational, multicenter, prospective, cohort study was conducted at 20 US and Canadian EDs. Centers from the United States used the Emergency Severity Index triage system or 1 of 3 unvalidated triage systems. Canadian centers used the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale. Patients aged 8 years or older who presented to the ED with a chief complaint of moderate to severe pain (>3 on a 10-point numerical rating scale) and who were ultimately discharged home were eligible for study enrollment. Triage score, triage system, pain rating on arrival, and time of initial analgesic administration were recorded. Results: Among 842 enrolled subjects, 506 (60{\%}) received an analgesic while in the ED. Lower-acuity patients consistently waited longer for analgesics. On multivariate modeling, presenting pain intensity, total time spent in the ED, white ethnicity, and triage system were associated with time to initial analgesic administration. Emergency departments using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale triage system exhibited the lowest rates of analgesic use and displayed longer median times to initial analgesic administration. Conclusions: Although there were some differences between triage systems, all sites and systems demonstrated unacceptably long times to analgesic provision. Many patients with moderate to severe pain received no analgesic during their ED stay. Future studies should examine whether ED overcrowding impacts timeliness of analgesic administration and identify specific strategies to improve pain management practices in this challenging environment.",
author = "James Ducharme and Paula Tanabe and Peter Homel and Miner, {James R.} and Chang, {Andrew K.} and Jacques Lee and Todd, {Knox H.}",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajem.2007.11.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "867--873",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of triage systems and triage scores on timeliness of ED analgesic administration

AU - Ducharme, James

AU - Tanabe, Paula

AU - Homel, Peter

AU - Miner, James R.

AU - Chang, Andrew K.

AU - Lee, Jacques

AU - Todd, Knox H.

PY - 2008/10

Y1 - 2008/10

N2 - Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine the association between triage scoring systems and triage priority scores on time to initial emergency department (ED) analgesic administration. Methods: An observational, multicenter, prospective, cohort study was conducted at 20 US and Canadian EDs. Centers from the United States used the Emergency Severity Index triage system or 1 of 3 unvalidated triage systems. Canadian centers used the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale. Patients aged 8 years or older who presented to the ED with a chief complaint of moderate to severe pain (>3 on a 10-point numerical rating scale) and who were ultimately discharged home were eligible for study enrollment. Triage score, triage system, pain rating on arrival, and time of initial analgesic administration were recorded. Results: Among 842 enrolled subjects, 506 (60%) received an analgesic while in the ED. Lower-acuity patients consistently waited longer for analgesics. On multivariate modeling, presenting pain intensity, total time spent in the ED, white ethnicity, and triage system were associated with time to initial analgesic administration. Emergency departments using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale triage system exhibited the lowest rates of analgesic use and displayed longer median times to initial analgesic administration. Conclusions: Although there were some differences between triage systems, all sites and systems demonstrated unacceptably long times to analgesic provision. Many patients with moderate to severe pain received no analgesic during their ED stay. Future studies should examine whether ED overcrowding impacts timeliness of analgesic administration and identify specific strategies to improve pain management practices in this challenging environment.

AB - Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine the association between triage scoring systems and triage priority scores on time to initial emergency department (ED) analgesic administration. Methods: An observational, multicenter, prospective, cohort study was conducted at 20 US and Canadian EDs. Centers from the United States used the Emergency Severity Index triage system or 1 of 3 unvalidated triage systems. Canadian centers used the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale. Patients aged 8 years or older who presented to the ED with a chief complaint of moderate to severe pain (>3 on a 10-point numerical rating scale) and who were ultimately discharged home were eligible for study enrollment. Triage score, triage system, pain rating on arrival, and time of initial analgesic administration were recorded. Results: Among 842 enrolled subjects, 506 (60%) received an analgesic while in the ED. Lower-acuity patients consistently waited longer for analgesics. On multivariate modeling, presenting pain intensity, total time spent in the ED, white ethnicity, and triage system were associated with time to initial analgesic administration. Emergency departments using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale triage system exhibited the lowest rates of analgesic use and displayed longer median times to initial analgesic administration. Conclusions: Although there were some differences between triage systems, all sites and systems demonstrated unacceptably long times to analgesic provision. Many patients with moderate to severe pain received no analgesic during their ED stay. Future studies should examine whether ED overcrowding impacts timeliness of analgesic administration and identify specific strategies to improve pain management practices in this challenging environment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53149145097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=53149145097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.11.020

DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.11.020

M3 - Article

C2 - 18926342

AN - SCOPUS:53149145097

VL - 26

SP - 867

EP - 873

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 8

ER -