The Impact of Opening a Medical Step-Down Unit on Medically Critically Ill Patient Outcomes and Throughput: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis

Hayley B. Gershengorn, Carri W. Chan, Yunchao Xu, Hanxi Sun, Ronni Levy, Mor Armony, Michelle Ng Gong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To understand the impact of adding a medical step-down unit (SDU) on patient outcomes and throughput in a medical intensive care unit (ICU). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Two academic tertiary care hospitals within the same health-care system. Patients: Adults admitted to the medical ICU at either the control or intervention hospital from October 2013 to March 2014 (preintervention) and October 2014 to March 2015 (postintervention). Interventions: Opening a 4-bed medical SDU at the intervention hospital on April 1, 2014. Measurements and Main Results: Using standard summary statistics, we compared patients across hospitals. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we quantified the association of opening an SDU and outcomes (hospital mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay [LOS], and time to transfer to the ICU) after adjustment for secular trends in patient case-mix and patient-level covariates which might impact outcome. We analyzed 500 (245 pre- and 255 postintervention) patients in the intervention hospital and 678 (323 pre- and 355 postintervention) in the control hospital. Patients at the control hospital were younger (60.5-60.6 vs 64.0-65.4 years, P <.001) with a higher severity of acute illness at the time of evaluation for ICU admission (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score: 4.9-4.0 vs 3.9-3.9, P <.001). Using the difference-in-differences methodology, we identified no association of hospital mortality (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.81 [0.42 to 1.55], P =.52) or hospital LOS (% change [95% confidence interval]: −8.7% [−28.6% to 11.2%], P =.39) with admission to the intervention hospital after SDU opening. The ICU LOS overall was not associated with admission to the intervention hospital in the postintervention period (−23.7% [−47.9% to 0.5%], P =.06); ICU LOS among survivors was significantly reduced (−27.5% [−50.5% to −4.6%], P =.019). Time to transfer to ICU was also significantly reduced (−26.7% [−44.7% to −8.8%], P =.004). Conclusions: Opening our medical SDU improved medical ICU throughput but did not affect more patient-centered outcomes of hospital mortality and LOS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Intensive Care Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Critical Illness
Intensive Care Units
Length of Stay
Hospital Mortality
Confidence Intervals
Organ Dysfunction Scores
Diagnosis-Related Groups
Tertiary Healthcare
Tertiary Care Centers
Survivors
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Odds Ratio
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • critical care
  • hospital administration
  • hospital mortality
  • hospital units
  • intensive care units
  • intermediate care units
  • length of stay
  • step-down units

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

The Impact of Opening a Medical Step-Down Unit on Medically Critically Ill Patient Outcomes and Throughput : A Difference-in-Differences Analysis. / Gershengorn, Hayley B.; Chan, Carri W.; Xu, Yunchao; Sun, Hanxi; Levy, Ronni; Armony, Mor; Gong, Michelle Ng.

In: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{13f9cfa0d89f46bbae389916a0fa0705,
title = "The Impact of Opening a Medical Step-Down Unit on Medically Critically Ill Patient Outcomes and Throughput: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis",
abstract = "Objective: To understand the impact of adding a medical step-down unit (SDU) on patient outcomes and throughput in a medical intensive care unit (ICU). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Two academic tertiary care hospitals within the same health-care system. Patients: Adults admitted to the medical ICU at either the control or intervention hospital from October 2013 to March 2014 (preintervention) and October 2014 to March 2015 (postintervention). Interventions: Opening a 4-bed medical SDU at the intervention hospital on April 1, 2014. Measurements and Main Results: Using standard summary statistics, we compared patients across hospitals. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we quantified the association of opening an SDU and outcomes (hospital mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay [LOS], and time to transfer to the ICU) after adjustment for secular trends in patient case-mix and patient-level covariates which might impact outcome. We analyzed 500 (245 pre- and 255 postintervention) patients in the intervention hospital and 678 (323 pre- and 355 postintervention) in the control hospital. Patients at the control hospital were younger (60.5-60.6 vs 64.0-65.4 years, P <.001) with a higher severity of acute illness at the time of evaluation for ICU admission (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score: 4.9-4.0 vs 3.9-3.9, P <.001). Using the difference-in-differences methodology, we identified no association of hospital mortality (odds ratio [95{\%} confidence interval]: 0.81 [0.42 to 1.55], P =.52) or hospital LOS ({\%} change [95{\%} confidence interval]: −8.7{\%} [−28.6{\%} to 11.2{\%}], P =.39) with admission to the intervention hospital after SDU opening. The ICU LOS overall was not associated with admission to the intervention hospital in the postintervention period (−23.7{\%} [−47.9{\%} to 0.5{\%}], P =.06); ICU LOS among survivors was significantly reduced (−27.5{\%} [−50.5{\%} to −4.6{\%}], P =.019). Time to transfer to ICU was also significantly reduced (−26.7{\%} [−44.7{\%} to −8.8{\%}], P =.004). Conclusions: Opening our medical SDU improved medical ICU throughput but did not affect more patient-centered outcomes of hospital mortality and LOS.",
keywords = "critical care, hospital administration, hospital mortality, hospital units, intensive care units, intermediate care units, length of stay, step-down units",
author = "Gershengorn, {Hayley B.} and Chan, {Carri W.} and Yunchao Xu and Hanxi Sun and Ronni Levy and Mor Armony and Gong, {Michelle Ng}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0885066618761810",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Intensive Care Medicine",
issn = "0885-0666",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Impact of Opening a Medical Step-Down Unit on Medically Critically Ill Patient Outcomes and Throughput

T2 - A Difference-in-Differences Analysis

AU - Gershengorn, Hayley B.

AU - Chan, Carri W.

AU - Xu, Yunchao

AU - Sun, Hanxi

AU - Levy, Ronni

AU - Armony, Mor

AU - Gong, Michelle Ng

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective: To understand the impact of adding a medical step-down unit (SDU) on patient outcomes and throughput in a medical intensive care unit (ICU). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Two academic tertiary care hospitals within the same health-care system. Patients: Adults admitted to the medical ICU at either the control or intervention hospital from October 2013 to March 2014 (preintervention) and October 2014 to March 2015 (postintervention). Interventions: Opening a 4-bed medical SDU at the intervention hospital on April 1, 2014. Measurements and Main Results: Using standard summary statistics, we compared patients across hospitals. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we quantified the association of opening an SDU and outcomes (hospital mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay [LOS], and time to transfer to the ICU) after adjustment for secular trends in patient case-mix and patient-level covariates which might impact outcome. We analyzed 500 (245 pre- and 255 postintervention) patients in the intervention hospital and 678 (323 pre- and 355 postintervention) in the control hospital. Patients at the control hospital were younger (60.5-60.6 vs 64.0-65.4 years, P <.001) with a higher severity of acute illness at the time of evaluation for ICU admission (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score: 4.9-4.0 vs 3.9-3.9, P <.001). Using the difference-in-differences methodology, we identified no association of hospital mortality (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.81 [0.42 to 1.55], P =.52) or hospital LOS (% change [95% confidence interval]: −8.7% [−28.6% to 11.2%], P =.39) with admission to the intervention hospital after SDU opening. The ICU LOS overall was not associated with admission to the intervention hospital in the postintervention period (−23.7% [−47.9% to 0.5%], P =.06); ICU LOS among survivors was significantly reduced (−27.5% [−50.5% to −4.6%], P =.019). Time to transfer to ICU was also significantly reduced (−26.7% [−44.7% to −8.8%], P =.004). Conclusions: Opening our medical SDU improved medical ICU throughput but did not affect more patient-centered outcomes of hospital mortality and LOS.

AB - Objective: To understand the impact of adding a medical step-down unit (SDU) on patient outcomes and throughput in a medical intensive care unit (ICU). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Two academic tertiary care hospitals within the same health-care system. Patients: Adults admitted to the medical ICU at either the control or intervention hospital from October 2013 to March 2014 (preintervention) and October 2014 to March 2015 (postintervention). Interventions: Opening a 4-bed medical SDU at the intervention hospital on April 1, 2014. Measurements and Main Results: Using standard summary statistics, we compared patients across hospitals. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we quantified the association of opening an SDU and outcomes (hospital mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay [LOS], and time to transfer to the ICU) after adjustment for secular trends in patient case-mix and patient-level covariates which might impact outcome. We analyzed 500 (245 pre- and 255 postintervention) patients in the intervention hospital and 678 (323 pre- and 355 postintervention) in the control hospital. Patients at the control hospital were younger (60.5-60.6 vs 64.0-65.4 years, P <.001) with a higher severity of acute illness at the time of evaluation for ICU admission (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score: 4.9-4.0 vs 3.9-3.9, P <.001). Using the difference-in-differences methodology, we identified no association of hospital mortality (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.81 [0.42 to 1.55], P =.52) or hospital LOS (% change [95% confidence interval]: −8.7% [−28.6% to 11.2%], P =.39) with admission to the intervention hospital after SDU opening. The ICU LOS overall was not associated with admission to the intervention hospital in the postintervention period (−23.7% [−47.9% to 0.5%], P =.06); ICU LOS among survivors was significantly reduced (−27.5% [−50.5% to −4.6%], P =.019). Time to transfer to ICU was also significantly reduced (−26.7% [−44.7% to −8.8%], P =.004). Conclusions: Opening our medical SDU improved medical ICU throughput but did not affect more patient-centered outcomes of hospital mortality and LOS.

KW - critical care

KW - hospital administration

KW - hospital mortality

KW - hospital units

KW - intensive care units

KW - intermediate care units

KW - length of stay

KW - step-down units

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046026195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046026195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0885066618761810

DO - 10.1177/0885066618761810

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046026195

JO - Journal of Intensive Care Medicine

JF - Journal of Intensive Care Medicine

SN - 0885-0666

ER -