The impact of certified diabetes educators on diabetes performance and variation among primary care sites within an integrated health system

James Grigg, Yuming Ning, Calie Santana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Primary care networks within integrated health systems can experience significant variation in diabetes care. We studied an established, 20-site network to determine the impact of a quality improvement intervention to add certified diabetes educators (CDEs). We sought to measure whether sites with CDEs had higher quality and whether care improved over time more in sites with CDEs, beyond the existing differences among sites. Methods: Diabetes quality outcomes were (1) HbA1c ≤8%, (2) low-density lipoprotein (LDL) ≤100 mg/dL, (3) microalbumin checked, (4) blood pressure (BP) ≤130/80 mm Hg (tight control), and (5) BP ≤140/90 mm Hg (lenient control). Baseline differences brought us to divide sites into 3 site types by predominant payer and teaching status (commercial/nonteaching, mixed [mostly government-sponsored]/teaching and mixed/nonteaching). We measured the association between CDEs and each outcome using a 2-level mixed effects logistic regression with site type as a random effect. Results: Our analysis included 13 001 patients with visits and labs pre- and post-CDE implementation. Sites with CDEs improved significantly in 2 of 5 outcomes compared with sites without CDEs. Improvements occurred in microalbumin checks (odds ratio = 2.21, P <.001) and BP <140/90 mm Hg (odds ratio = 1.46, P =.03). There was no improvement in the other measures of diabetes quality. Of note, commercial/nonteaching and mixed/teaching sites also improved significantly in these 2 outcomes compared with mixed/nonteaching sites during that time period. Conclusions: We found that CDEs are associated with significant improvements in some diabetes outcomes. However, heterogeneity among primary care sites in an integrated network persists and all types of sites might not benefit equally from a quality improvement intervention like CDEs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)80-84
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of primary care & community health
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Teaching
Quality Improvement
Blood Pressure
Health
Odds Ratio
Quality of Health Care
LDL Lipoproteins
Logistic Models

Keywords

  • Certified diabetes educators
  • Integrated health systems
  • Primary care networks
  • Quality improvement
  • Variation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Community and Home Care
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The impact of certified diabetes educators on diabetes performance and variation among primary care sites within an integrated health system. / Grigg, James; Ning, Yuming; Santana, Calie.

In: Journal of primary care & community health, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2014, p. 80-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{41ab7e6cd2c24c3a8ba65e6699ed83f6,
title = "The impact of certified diabetes educators on diabetes performance and variation among primary care sites within an integrated health system",
abstract = "Objectives: Primary care networks within integrated health systems can experience significant variation in diabetes care. We studied an established, 20-site network to determine the impact of a quality improvement intervention to add certified diabetes educators (CDEs). We sought to measure whether sites with CDEs had higher quality and whether care improved over time more in sites with CDEs, beyond the existing differences among sites. Methods: Diabetes quality outcomes were (1) HbA1c ≤8{\%}, (2) low-density lipoprotein (LDL) ≤100 mg/dL, (3) microalbumin checked, (4) blood pressure (BP) ≤130/80 mm Hg (tight control), and (5) BP ≤140/90 mm Hg (lenient control). Baseline differences brought us to divide sites into 3 site types by predominant payer and teaching status (commercial/nonteaching, mixed [mostly government-sponsored]/teaching and mixed/nonteaching). We measured the association between CDEs and each outcome using a 2-level mixed effects logistic regression with site type as a random effect. Results: Our analysis included 13 001 patients with visits and labs pre- and post-CDE implementation. Sites with CDEs improved significantly in 2 of 5 outcomes compared with sites without CDEs. Improvements occurred in microalbumin checks (odds ratio = 2.21, P <.001) and BP <140/90 mm Hg (odds ratio = 1.46, P =.03). There was no improvement in the other measures of diabetes quality. Of note, commercial/nonteaching and mixed/teaching sites also improved significantly in these 2 outcomes compared with mixed/nonteaching sites during that time period. Conclusions: We found that CDEs are associated with significant improvements in some diabetes outcomes. However, heterogeneity among primary care sites in an integrated network persists and all types of sites might not benefit equally from a quality improvement intervention like CDEs.",
keywords = "Certified diabetes educators, Integrated health systems, Primary care networks, Quality improvement, Variation",
author = "James Grigg and Yuming Ning and Calie Santana",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/2150131913520552",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "80--84",
journal = "Journal of primary care & community health",
issn = "2150-1319",
publisher = "Sage Periodicals Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of certified diabetes educators on diabetes performance and variation among primary care sites within an integrated health system

AU - Grigg, James

AU - Ning, Yuming

AU - Santana, Calie

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objectives: Primary care networks within integrated health systems can experience significant variation in diabetes care. We studied an established, 20-site network to determine the impact of a quality improvement intervention to add certified diabetes educators (CDEs). We sought to measure whether sites with CDEs had higher quality and whether care improved over time more in sites with CDEs, beyond the existing differences among sites. Methods: Diabetes quality outcomes were (1) HbA1c ≤8%, (2) low-density lipoprotein (LDL) ≤100 mg/dL, (3) microalbumin checked, (4) blood pressure (BP) ≤130/80 mm Hg (tight control), and (5) BP ≤140/90 mm Hg (lenient control). Baseline differences brought us to divide sites into 3 site types by predominant payer and teaching status (commercial/nonteaching, mixed [mostly government-sponsored]/teaching and mixed/nonteaching). We measured the association between CDEs and each outcome using a 2-level mixed effects logistic regression with site type as a random effect. Results: Our analysis included 13 001 patients with visits and labs pre- and post-CDE implementation. Sites with CDEs improved significantly in 2 of 5 outcomes compared with sites without CDEs. Improvements occurred in microalbumin checks (odds ratio = 2.21, P <.001) and BP <140/90 mm Hg (odds ratio = 1.46, P =.03). There was no improvement in the other measures of diabetes quality. Of note, commercial/nonteaching and mixed/teaching sites also improved significantly in these 2 outcomes compared with mixed/nonteaching sites during that time period. Conclusions: We found that CDEs are associated with significant improvements in some diabetes outcomes. However, heterogeneity among primary care sites in an integrated network persists and all types of sites might not benefit equally from a quality improvement intervention like CDEs.

AB - Objectives: Primary care networks within integrated health systems can experience significant variation in diabetes care. We studied an established, 20-site network to determine the impact of a quality improvement intervention to add certified diabetes educators (CDEs). We sought to measure whether sites with CDEs had higher quality and whether care improved over time more in sites with CDEs, beyond the existing differences among sites. Methods: Diabetes quality outcomes were (1) HbA1c ≤8%, (2) low-density lipoprotein (LDL) ≤100 mg/dL, (3) microalbumin checked, (4) blood pressure (BP) ≤130/80 mm Hg (tight control), and (5) BP ≤140/90 mm Hg (lenient control). Baseline differences brought us to divide sites into 3 site types by predominant payer and teaching status (commercial/nonteaching, mixed [mostly government-sponsored]/teaching and mixed/nonteaching). We measured the association between CDEs and each outcome using a 2-level mixed effects logistic regression with site type as a random effect. Results: Our analysis included 13 001 patients with visits and labs pre- and post-CDE implementation. Sites with CDEs improved significantly in 2 of 5 outcomes compared with sites without CDEs. Improvements occurred in microalbumin checks (odds ratio = 2.21, P <.001) and BP <140/90 mm Hg (odds ratio = 1.46, P =.03). There was no improvement in the other measures of diabetes quality. Of note, commercial/nonteaching and mixed/teaching sites also improved significantly in these 2 outcomes compared with mixed/nonteaching sites during that time period. Conclusions: We found that CDEs are associated with significant improvements in some diabetes outcomes. However, heterogeneity among primary care sites in an integrated network persists and all types of sites might not benefit equally from a quality improvement intervention like CDEs.

KW - Certified diabetes educators

KW - Integrated health systems

KW - Primary care networks

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Variation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904693370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904693370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2150131913520552

DO - 10.1177/2150131913520552

M3 - Article

C2 - 24488252

AN - SCOPUS:84904693370

VL - 5

SP - 80

EP - 84

JO - Journal of primary care & community health

JF - Journal of primary care & community health

SN - 2150-1319

IS - 2

ER -