The ethics of sex selection and family balancing

Ruth Macklin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ethical concerns about the ethics of selecting the sex of a child predate current techniques of prenatal genetic diagnosis (PGD) and sperm sorting. The only methods previously available were highly problematic, as they involved infanticide or abortion of an unwanted sex. PGD is less problematic than the earlier methods, yet still troubling to some because it involves destruction of a healthy embryo and risks to women. The technique of sperm sorting, still in an experimental phase, is the least ethically problematic method, yet opponents argue that sex selection by any means involves sex discrimination and can have undesirable consequences. One such consequence is an imbalance in the sex ratio. This imbalance already exists in some Asian countries that favor male children, but is less likely in Western Europe and North America. There is increasing acceptance of family balancing as a reason for sex selection, but some people remain opposed to broadening the indications for sex selection of offspring beyond family balancing. Nevertheless, parents may have good reasons other than family balancing for choosing the sex of a future child. Such reasons may be justified by the principle of reproductive liberty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)315-321
Number of pages7
JournalSeminars in Reproductive Medicine
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Sex Preselection
Ethics
Prenatal Diagnosis
Spermatozoa
Infanticide
Sexism
Genetic Techniques
Sex Ratio
North America
Prednisolone
Embryonic Structures
Parents

Keywords

  • family balancing
  • reproductive liberty
  • Sex selection
  • sperm sorting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Reproductive Medicine

Cite this

The ethics of sex selection and family balancing. / Macklin, Ruth.

In: Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2010, p. 315-321.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Macklin, Ruth. / The ethics of sex selection and family balancing. In: Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 315-321.
@article{02825de10ed843efaedfc10d9ac5bde8,
title = "The ethics of sex selection and family balancing",
abstract = "Ethical concerns about the ethics of selecting the sex of a child predate current techniques of prenatal genetic diagnosis (PGD) and sperm sorting. The only methods previously available were highly problematic, as they involved infanticide or abortion of an unwanted sex. PGD is less problematic than the earlier methods, yet still troubling to some because it involves destruction of a healthy embryo and risks to women. The technique of sperm sorting, still in an experimental phase, is the least ethically problematic method, yet opponents argue that sex selection by any means involves sex discrimination and can have undesirable consequences. One such consequence is an imbalance in the sex ratio. This imbalance already exists in some Asian countries that favor male children, but is less likely in Western Europe and North America. There is increasing acceptance of family balancing as a reason for sex selection, but some people remain opposed to broadening the indications for sex selection of offspring beyond family balancing. Nevertheless, parents may have good reasons other than family balancing for choosing the sex of a future child. Such reasons may be justified by the principle of reproductive liberty.",
keywords = "family balancing, reproductive liberty, Sex selection, sperm sorting",
author = "Ruth Macklin",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1055/s-0030-1255179",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "315--321",
journal = "Seminars in Reproductive Medicine",
issn = "1526-8004",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ethics of sex selection and family balancing

AU - Macklin, Ruth

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Ethical concerns about the ethics of selecting the sex of a child predate current techniques of prenatal genetic diagnosis (PGD) and sperm sorting. The only methods previously available were highly problematic, as they involved infanticide or abortion of an unwanted sex. PGD is less problematic than the earlier methods, yet still troubling to some because it involves destruction of a healthy embryo and risks to women. The technique of sperm sorting, still in an experimental phase, is the least ethically problematic method, yet opponents argue that sex selection by any means involves sex discrimination and can have undesirable consequences. One such consequence is an imbalance in the sex ratio. This imbalance already exists in some Asian countries that favor male children, but is less likely in Western Europe and North America. There is increasing acceptance of family balancing as a reason for sex selection, but some people remain opposed to broadening the indications for sex selection of offspring beyond family balancing. Nevertheless, parents may have good reasons other than family balancing for choosing the sex of a future child. Such reasons may be justified by the principle of reproductive liberty.

AB - Ethical concerns about the ethics of selecting the sex of a child predate current techniques of prenatal genetic diagnosis (PGD) and sperm sorting. The only methods previously available were highly problematic, as they involved infanticide or abortion of an unwanted sex. PGD is less problematic than the earlier methods, yet still troubling to some because it involves destruction of a healthy embryo and risks to women. The technique of sperm sorting, still in an experimental phase, is the least ethically problematic method, yet opponents argue that sex selection by any means involves sex discrimination and can have undesirable consequences. One such consequence is an imbalance in the sex ratio. This imbalance already exists in some Asian countries that favor male children, but is less likely in Western Europe and North America. There is increasing acceptance of family balancing as a reason for sex selection, but some people remain opposed to broadening the indications for sex selection of offspring beyond family balancing. Nevertheless, parents may have good reasons other than family balancing for choosing the sex of a future child. Such reasons may be justified by the principle of reproductive liberty.

KW - family balancing

KW - reproductive liberty

KW - Sex selection

KW - sperm sorting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955379182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955379182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0030-1255179

DO - 10.1055/s-0030-1255179

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 315

EP - 321

JO - Seminars in Reproductive Medicine

JF - Seminars in Reproductive Medicine

SN - 1526-8004

IS - 4

ER -