The emerging public discourse on state legalization of marijuana for recreational use in the US: Analysis of news media coverage, 2010–2014

Emma E. McGinty, Hillary Samples, Sachini N. Bandara, Brendan Saloner, Marcus A. Bachhuber, Colleen L. Barry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives US states have begun to legalize marijuana for recreational use. In the absence of clear scientific evidence regarding the likely public health consequences of legalization, it is important to understand how the risks and benefits of this policy are being discussed in the national dialogue. To assess the public discourse on recreational marijuana policy, we assessed the volume and content of US news media coverage of the topic. Method We analyzed the content of a 20% random sample of news stories published/aired in high circulation/viewership print, television, and Internet news sources from 2010 to 2014 (N = 610). Results News media coverage of recreational marijuana policy was heavily concentrated in news outlets from the four states (AK, CO, OR, WA) and DC that legalized marijuana for recreational use during the study period. Overall, 53% of news stories mentioned pro-legalization arguments and 47% mentioned anti-legalization arguments. The most frequent pro-legalization arguments posited that legalization would reduce criminal justice involvement/costs (20% of news stories) and increase tax revenue (19%). Anti-legalization arguments centered on adverse public health consequences, such as detriments to youth health and well-being (22%) and marijuana-impaired driving (6%). Some evidence-informed public health regulatory options, like marketing and packaging restrictions, were mentioned in 5% of news stories or fewer. Conclusion As additional states continue to debate legalization of marijuana for recreational use, it is critical for the public health community to develop communication strategies that accurately convey the rapidly evolving research evidence regarding recreational marijuana policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)114-120
Number of pages7
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume90
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Cannabis
Public Health
Criminal Law
Taxes
Television
Product Packaging
Carbon Monoxide
Marketing
Internet
Communication
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

The emerging public discourse on state legalization of marijuana for recreational use in the US : Analysis of news media coverage, 2010–2014. / McGinty, Emma E.; Samples, Hillary; Bandara, Sachini N.; Saloner, Brendan; Bachhuber, Marcus A.; Barry, Colleen L.

In: Preventive Medicine, Vol. 90, 01.09.2016, p. 114-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McGinty, Emma E. ; Samples, Hillary ; Bandara, Sachini N. ; Saloner, Brendan ; Bachhuber, Marcus A. ; Barry, Colleen L. / The emerging public discourse on state legalization of marijuana for recreational use in the US : Analysis of news media coverage, 2010–2014. In: Preventive Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 90. pp. 114-120.
@article{a939c4199c3f48bb99caca47164fcfa0,
title = "The emerging public discourse on state legalization of marijuana for recreational use in the US: Analysis of news media coverage, 2010–2014",
abstract = "Objectives US states have begun to legalize marijuana for recreational use. In the absence of clear scientific evidence regarding the likely public health consequences of legalization, it is important to understand how the risks and benefits of this policy are being discussed in the national dialogue. To assess the public discourse on recreational marijuana policy, we assessed the volume and content of US news media coverage of the topic. Method We analyzed the content of a 20{\%} random sample of news stories published/aired in high circulation/viewership print, television, and Internet news sources from 2010 to 2014 (N = 610). Results News media coverage of recreational marijuana policy was heavily concentrated in news outlets from the four states (AK, CO, OR, WA) and DC that legalized marijuana for recreational use during the study period. Overall, 53{\%} of news stories mentioned pro-legalization arguments and 47{\%} mentioned anti-legalization arguments. The most frequent pro-legalization arguments posited that legalization would reduce criminal justice involvement/costs (20{\%} of news stories) and increase tax revenue (19{\%}). Anti-legalization arguments centered on adverse public health consequences, such as detriments to youth health and well-being (22{\%}) and marijuana-impaired driving (6{\%}). Some evidence-informed public health regulatory options, like marketing and packaging restrictions, were mentioned in 5{\%} of news stories or fewer. Conclusion As additional states continue to debate legalization of marijuana for recreational use, it is critical for the public health community to develop communication strategies that accurately convey the rapidly evolving research evidence regarding recreational marijuana policy.",
author = "McGinty, {Emma E.} and Hillary Samples and Bandara, {Sachini N.} and Brendan Saloner and Bachhuber, {Marcus A.} and Barry, {Colleen L.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.040",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "114--120",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The emerging public discourse on state legalization of marijuana for recreational use in the US

T2 - Analysis of news media coverage, 2010–2014

AU - McGinty, Emma E.

AU - Samples, Hillary

AU - Bandara, Sachini N.

AU - Saloner, Brendan

AU - Bachhuber, Marcus A.

AU - Barry, Colleen L.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Objectives US states have begun to legalize marijuana for recreational use. In the absence of clear scientific evidence regarding the likely public health consequences of legalization, it is important to understand how the risks and benefits of this policy are being discussed in the national dialogue. To assess the public discourse on recreational marijuana policy, we assessed the volume and content of US news media coverage of the topic. Method We analyzed the content of a 20% random sample of news stories published/aired in high circulation/viewership print, television, and Internet news sources from 2010 to 2014 (N = 610). Results News media coverage of recreational marijuana policy was heavily concentrated in news outlets from the four states (AK, CO, OR, WA) and DC that legalized marijuana for recreational use during the study period. Overall, 53% of news stories mentioned pro-legalization arguments and 47% mentioned anti-legalization arguments. The most frequent pro-legalization arguments posited that legalization would reduce criminal justice involvement/costs (20% of news stories) and increase tax revenue (19%). Anti-legalization arguments centered on adverse public health consequences, such as detriments to youth health and well-being (22%) and marijuana-impaired driving (6%). Some evidence-informed public health regulatory options, like marketing and packaging restrictions, were mentioned in 5% of news stories or fewer. Conclusion As additional states continue to debate legalization of marijuana for recreational use, it is critical for the public health community to develop communication strategies that accurately convey the rapidly evolving research evidence regarding recreational marijuana policy.

AB - Objectives US states have begun to legalize marijuana for recreational use. In the absence of clear scientific evidence regarding the likely public health consequences of legalization, it is important to understand how the risks and benefits of this policy are being discussed in the national dialogue. To assess the public discourse on recreational marijuana policy, we assessed the volume and content of US news media coverage of the topic. Method We analyzed the content of a 20% random sample of news stories published/aired in high circulation/viewership print, television, and Internet news sources from 2010 to 2014 (N = 610). Results News media coverage of recreational marijuana policy was heavily concentrated in news outlets from the four states (AK, CO, OR, WA) and DC that legalized marijuana for recreational use during the study period. Overall, 53% of news stories mentioned pro-legalization arguments and 47% mentioned anti-legalization arguments. The most frequent pro-legalization arguments posited that legalization would reduce criminal justice involvement/costs (20% of news stories) and increase tax revenue (19%). Anti-legalization arguments centered on adverse public health consequences, such as detriments to youth health and well-being (22%) and marijuana-impaired driving (6%). Some evidence-informed public health regulatory options, like marketing and packaging restrictions, were mentioned in 5% of news stories or fewer. Conclusion As additional states continue to debate legalization of marijuana for recreational use, it is critical for the public health community to develop communication strategies that accurately convey the rapidly evolving research evidence regarding recreational marijuana policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978910861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978910861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.040

DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.040

M3 - Article

C2 - 27373208

AN - SCOPUS:84978910861

VL - 90

SP - 114

EP - 120

JO - Preventive Medicine

JF - Preventive Medicine

SN - 0091-7435

ER -