The effect of rod diameter on correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at two years follow-up

Daniel E. Prince, Hiroko Matsumoto, Charles M. Chan, Jaime A. Gomez, Joshua E. Hyman, David P. Roye, Michael G. Vitale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study design: The review of multicenter national pediatric scoliosis database. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent scoliosis surgery utilizing different rod diameter constructs by the posterior approach. Background: Little attention has specifically been focused on the effect of rod diameter on correction of spinal deformity after posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion in children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: The review of national database comprised of 1125 patients, of which 352 patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Of these, 163 patients received 5.5 mm and 189 patients received 6.35 mm diameter rods for posterior spinal instrumentation. Results: The 6.35 mm rods were used more often for patients who were male, taller, heavier, with larger coronal curves, and more flexible curves. Larger diameter rods were also more likely to be stainless steel, implanted with an increased number of implants per level, and an increased number of pedicle screws used on the concavity of the curve. Univariate analysis of coronal curve showed a significant difference between 5.5 and 6.35 mm rods in correction (67.0% vs. 57.3%) at 2 years. Multivariate analysis revealed that the most significant factors affecting coronal curve correction at 2 years were rod diameter, the patient's preoperative coronal major curve and flexibility, and the implant density. In the sagittal plane, preoperative sagittal curve and rod diameter are the predictors of sagittal correction at 2 years. Conclusions: The study did not support our hypothesis that larger rods would be associated with a greater correction of frontal and sagittal plane in patients with AIS. In addition to rod diameter, implant density and the inherent flexibility and deformity of the patient were found to be influential factors contributing for the correction and maintenance of coronal and sagittal curves in AIS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-28
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Scoliosis
Databases
Spinal Fusion
Stainless Steel
Multivariate Analysis
Maintenance
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)
  • Correction of spinal deformity
  • Posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion
  • Rod diameter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

The effect of rod diameter on correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at two years follow-up. / Prince, Daniel E.; Matsumoto, Hiroko; Chan, Charles M.; Gomez, Jaime A.; Hyman, Joshua E.; Roye, David P.; Vitale, Michael G.

In: Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 22-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Prince, Daniel E. ; Matsumoto, Hiroko ; Chan, Charles M. ; Gomez, Jaime A. ; Hyman, Joshua E. ; Roye, David P. ; Vitale, Michael G. / The effect of rod diameter on correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at two years follow-up. In: Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2014 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 22-28.
@article{8b36e40a02264c99b4dd4c8ea9e8002f,
title = "The effect of rod diameter on correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at two years follow-up",
abstract = "Study design: The review of multicenter national pediatric scoliosis database. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent scoliosis surgery utilizing different rod diameter constructs by the posterior approach. Background: Little attention has specifically been focused on the effect of rod diameter on correction of spinal deformity after posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion in children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: The review of national database comprised of 1125 patients, of which 352 patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Of these, 163 patients received 5.5 mm and 189 patients received 6.35 mm diameter rods for posterior spinal instrumentation. Results: The 6.35 mm rods were used more often for patients who were male, taller, heavier, with larger coronal curves, and more flexible curves. Larger diameter rods were also more likely to be stainless steel, implanted with an increased number of implants per level, and an increased number of pedicle screws used on the concavity of the curve. Univariate analysis of coronal curve showed a significant difference between 5.5 and 6.35 mm rods in correction (67.0{\%} vs. 57.3{\%}) at 2 years. Multivariate analysis revealed that the most significant factors affecting coronal curve correction at 2 years were rod diameter, the patient's preoperative coronal major curve and flexibility, and the implant density. In the sagittal plane, preoperative sagittal curve and rod diameter are the predictors of sagittal correction at 2 years. Conclusions: The study did not support our hypothesis that larger rods would be associated with a greater correction of frontal and sagittal plane in patients with AIS. In addition to rod diameter, implant density and the inherent flexibility and deformity of the patient were found to be influential factors contributing for the correction and maintenance of coronal and sagittal curves in AIS.",
keywords = "Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), Correction of spinal deformity, Posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion, Rod diameter",
author = "Prince, {Daniel E.} and Hiroko Matsumoto and Chan, {Charles M.} and Gomez, {Jaime A.} and Hyman, {Joshua E.} and Roye, {David P.} and Vitale, {Michael G.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BPO.0b013e318288b3c1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "22--28",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics",
issn = "0271-6798",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of rod diameter on correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at two years follow-up

AU - Prince, Daniel E.

AU - Matsumoto, Hiroko

AU - Chan, Charles M.

AU - Gomez, Jaime A.

AU - Hyman, Joshua E.

AU - Roye, David P.

AU - Vitale, Michael G.

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Study design: The review of multicenter national pediatric scoliosis database. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent scoliosis surgery utilizing different rod diameter constructs by the posterior approach. Background: Little attention has specifically been focused on the effect of rod diameter on correction of spinal deformity after posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion in children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: The review of national database comprised of 1125 patients, of which 352 patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Of these, 163 patients received 5.5 mm and 189 patients received 6.35 mm diameter rods for posterior spinal instrumentation. Results: The 6.35 mm rods were used more often for patients who were male, taller, heavier, with larger coronal curves, and more flexible curves. Larger diameter rods were also more likely to be stainless steel, implanted with an increased number of implants per level, and an increased number of pedicle screws used on the concavity of the curve. Univariate analysis of coronal curve showed a significant difference between 5.5 and 6.35 mm rods in correction (67.0% vs. 57.3%) at 2 years. Multivariate analysis revealed that the most significant factors affecting coronal curve correction at 2 years were rod diameter, the patient's preoperative coronal major curve and flexibility, and the implant density. In the sagittal plane, preoperative sagittal curve and rod diameter are the predictors of sagittal correction at 2 years. Conclusions: The study did not support our hypothesis that larger rods would be associated with a greater correction of frontal and sagittal plane in patients with AIS. In addition to rod diameter, implant density and the inherent flexibility and deformity of the patient were found to be influential factors contributing for the correction and maintenance of coronal and sagittal curves in AIS.

AB - Study design: The review of multicenter national pediatric scoliosis database. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent scoliosis surgery utilizing different rod diameter constructs by the posterior approach. Background: Little attention has specifically been focused on the effect of rod diameter on correction of spinal deformity after posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion in children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: The review of national database comprised of 1125 patients, of which 352 patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Of these, 163 patients received 5.5 mm and 189 patients received 6.35 mm diameter rods for posterior spinal instrumentation. Results: The 6.35 mm rods were used more often for patients who were male, taller, heavier, with larger coronal curves, and more flexible curves. Larger diameter rods were also more likely to be stainless steel, implanted with an increased number of implants per level, and an increased number of pedicle screws used on the concavity of the curve. Univariate analysis of coronal curve showed a significant difference between 5.5 and 6.35 mm rods in correction (67.0% vs. 57.3%) at 2 years. Multivariate analysis revealed that the most significant factors affecting coronal curve correction at 2 years were rod diameter, the patient's preoperative coronal major curve and flexibility, and the implant density. In the sagittal plane, preoperative sagittal curve and rod diameter are the predictors of sagittal correction at 2 years. Conclusions: The study did not support our hypothesis that larger rods would be associated with a greater correction of frontal and sagittal plane in patients with AIS. In addition to rod diameter, implant density and the inherent flexibility and deformity of the patient were found to be influential factors contributing for the correction and maintenance of coronal and sagittal curves in AIS.

KW - Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)

KW - Correction of spinal deformity

KW - Posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion

KW - Rod diameter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890565576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890565576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318288b3c1

DO - 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318288b3c1

M3 - Article

C2 - 23863413

AN - SCOPUS:84890565576

VL - 34

SP - 22

EP - 28

JO - Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

JF - Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

SN - 0271-6798

IS - 1

ER -