The effect of intraarticular anesthesia and elastic bandage on elbow proprioception

Victor Khabie, Michael C. Schwartz, Andrew S. Rokito, Maureen A. Gallagher, Frances Cuomo, Joseph D. Zuckerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Twenty uninjured male volunteers were studied to characterize normal elbow proprioception and to investigate the effect of applying an elastic bandage to the extremity and injection of an intraarticular anesthetic. A modified Biodex dynamometer was used to study position sense and detection of motion. In part 1 of the study position sense was tested by flexing the elbow to a predetermined angle, returning to the starting position, and then asking the subject to identify that angle. In part 2 detection of motion was tested by asking the subject to disengage the apparatus by pressing a stop button when movement was detected. The testing conditions in part 1 and part 2 were repeated after the elbow was wrapped with an elastic bandage and again after an intraarticular injection of 3 cc 1% lidocaine with the bandage removed. Ten additional subjects underwent testing of both elbows to examine the effect of arm dominance. Mean position sense was within 3.3° ± 1.3° of the actual angle in trials without an elastic bandage or an anesthetic. A significant improvement in position sense was observed (2.2° ± 1.2°) after an elastic bandage was applied (P < .004). No significant difference was seen in position sense after lidocaine was injected. The mean threshold for detection of motion in trials without an elastic bandage or an anesthetic was 4.21° ± 1.56°. No significant differences were seen in detection of motion observed with the elastic bandage or intraarticular anesthetic. No significant differences were seen between dominant and nondominant extremities for both position sense and detection of motion. The application of an elastic bandage improved position sense, suggesting that tactile cues from cutaneous or other extraarticular receptors may play a role in elbow proprioception. Intraarticular anesthesia, however, had little effect, suggesting that intracapsular receptors play a lesser role in elbow proprioception. The determination of proprioceptive qualities for the normal elbow can aid in the understanding of elbow function and provide a basis for defining its role in elbow dysfunction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)501-504
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume7
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Compression Bandages
Proprioception
Elbow
Anesthesia
Anesthetics
Intra-Articular Injections
Lidocaine
Extremities
Touch
Bandages
Cues
Volunteers
Arm

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

The effect of intraarticular anesthesia and elastic bandage on elbow proprioception. / Khabie, Victor; Schwartz, Michael C.; Rokito, Andrew S.; Gallagher, Maureen A.; Cuomo, Frances; Zuckerman, Joseph D.

In: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Vol. 7, No. 5, 01.01.1998, p. 501-504.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Khabie, Victor ; Schwartz, Michael C. ; Rokito, Andrew S. ; Gallagher, Maureen A. ; Cuomo, Frances ; Zuckerman, Joseph D. / The effect of intraarticular anesthesia and elastic bandage on elbow proprioception. In: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 1998 ; Vol. 7, No. 5. pp. 501-504.
@article{35dc8de661a74a5aad4751cee2961b4f,
title = "The effect of intraarticular anesthesia and elastic bandage on elbow proprioception",
abstract = "Twenty uninjured male volunteers were studied to characterize normal elbow proprioception and to investigate the effect of applying an elastic bandage to the extremity and injection of an intraarticular anesthetic. A modified Biodex dynamometer was used to study position sense and detection of motion. In part 1 of the study position sense was tested by flexing the elbow to a predetermined angle, returning to the starting position, and then asking the subject to identify that angle. In part 2 detection of motion was tested by asking the subject to disengage the apparatus by pressing a stop button when movement was detected. The testing conditions in part 1 and part 2 were repeated after the elbow was wrapped with an elastic bandage and again after an intraarticular injection of 3 cc 1{\%} lidocaine with the bandage removed. Ten additional subjects underwent testing of both elbows to examine the effect of arm dominance. Mean position sense was within 3.3° ± 1.3° of the actual angle in trials without an elastic bandage or an anesthetic. A significant improvement in position sense was observed (2.2° ± 1.2°) after an elastic bandage was applied (P < .004). No significant difference was seen in position sense after lidocaine was injected. The mean threshold for detection of motion in trials without an elastic bandage or an anesthetic was 4.21° ± 1.56°. No significant differences were seen in detection of motion observed with the elastic bandage or intraarticular anesthetic. No significant differences were seen between dominant and nondominant extremities for both position sense and detection of motion. The application of an elastic bandage improved position sense, suggesting that tactile cues from cutaneous or other extraarticular receptors may play a role in elbow proprioception. Intraarticular anesthesia, however, had little effect, suggesting that intracapsular receptors play a lesser role in elbow proprioception. The determination of proprioceptive qualities for the normal elbow can aid in the understanding of elbow function and provide a basis for defining its role in elbow dysfunction.",
author = "Victor Khabie and Schwartz, {Michael C.} and Rokito, {Andrew S.} and Gallagher, {Maureen A.} and Frances Cuomo and Zuckerman, {Joseph D.}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1058-2746(98)90202-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "501--504",
journal = "Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery",
issn = "1058-2746",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of intraarticular anesthesia and elastic bandage on elbow proprioception

AU - Khabie, Victor

AU - Schwartz, Michael C.

AU - Rokito, Andrew S.

AU - Gallagher, Maureen A.

AU - Cuomo, Frances

AU - Zuckerman, Joseph D.

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Twenty uninjured male volunteers were studied to characterize normal elbow proprioception and to investigate the effect of applying an elastic bandage to the extremity and injection of an intraarticular anesthetic. A modified Biodex dynamometer was used to study position sense and detection of motion. In part 1 of the study position sense was tested by flexing the elbow to a predetermined angle, returning to the starting position, and then asking the subject to identify that angle. In part 2 detection of motion was tested by asking the subject to disengage the apparatus by pressing a stop button when movement was detected. The testing conditions in part 1 and part 2 were repeated after the elbow was wrapped with an elastic bandage and again after an intraarticular injection of 3 cc 1% lidocaine with the bandage removed. Ten additional subjects underwent testing of both elbows to examine the effect of arm dominance. Mean position sense was within 3.3° ± 1.3° of the actual angle in trials without an elastic bandage or an anesthetic. A significant improvement in position sense was observed (2.2° ± 1.2°) after an elastic bandage was applied (P < .004). No significant difference was seen in position sense after lidocaine was injected. The mean threshold for detection of motion in trials without an elastic bandage or an anesthetic was 4.21° ± 1.56°. No significant differences were seen in detection of motion observed with the elastic bandage or intraarticular anesthetic. No significant differences were seen between dominant and nondominant extremities for both position sense and detection of motion. The application of an elastic bandage improved position sense, suggesting that tactile cues from cutaneous or other extraarticular receptors may play a role in elbow proprioception. Intraarticular anesthesia, however, had little effect, suggesting that intracapsular receptors play a lesser role in elbow proprioception. The determination of proprioceptive qualities for the normal elbow can aid in the understanding of elbow function and provide a basis for defining its role in elbow dysfunction.

AB - Twenty uninjured male volunteers were studied to characterize normal elbow proprioception and to investigate the effect of applying an elastic bandage to the extremity and injection of an intraarticular anesthetic. A modified Biodex dynamometer was used to study position sense and detection of motion. In part 1 of the study position sense was tested by flexing the elbow to a predetermined angle, returning to the starting position, and then asking the subject to identify that angle. In part 2 detection of motion was tested by asking the subject to disengage the apparatus by pressing a stop button when movement was detected. The testing conditions in part 1 and part 2 were repeated after the elbow was wrapped with an elastic bandage and again after an intraarticular injection of 3 cc 1% lidocaine with the bandage removed. Ten additional subjects underwent testing of both elbows to examine the effect of arm dominance. Mean position sense was within 3.3° ± 1.3° of the actual angle in trials without an elastic bandage or an anesthetic. A significant improvement in position sense was observed (2.2° ± 1.2°) after an elastic bandage was applied (P < .004). No significant difference was seen in position sense after lidocaine was injected. The mean threshold for detection of motion in trials without an elastic bandage or an anesthetic was 4.21° ± 1.56°. No significant differences were seen in detection of motion observed with the elastic bandage or intraarticular anesthetic. No significant differences were seen between dominant and nondominant extremities for both position sense and detection of motion. The application of an elastic bandage improved position sense, suggesting that tactile cues from cutaneous or other extraarticular receptors may play a role in elbow proprioception. Intraarticular anesthesia, however, had little effect, suggesting that intracapsular receptors play a lesser role in elbow proprioception. The determination of proprioceptive qualities for the normal elbow can aid in the understanding of elbow function and provide a basis for defining its role in elbow dysfunction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032152212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032152212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1058-2746(98)90202-6

DO - 10.1016/S1058-2746(98)90202-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 9814930

AN - SCOPUS:0032152212

VL - 7

SP - 501

EP - 504

JO - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

JF - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

SN - 1058-2746

IS - 5

ER -