The effect of erroneous computer interpretation of ECGs on resident decision making

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. The use of computer interpretations of electrocardiograms (ECGs) as an aid to physician interpretations is widespread. Computer misinterpretations are common and negatively affect physician interpretations. Objective. To measure the effect of computer ECG misinterpretations on clinical decision making. Design. Quasi-randomized trial. Setting. Resident teaching conferences. Participants. Included 105 internal and emergency medicine residents. Intervention. After a brief case presentation, residents were asked to interpret an ECG and choose appropriate management. Residents chose from a concealed stack of handouts; some contained an erroneous computer interpretation of the ECG (citing acute ischemia), and some contained no computer interpretation. Measurements. ECG interpretations and management decisions by residents whose ECG did or did not include an erroneous computer interpretation were compared using chi-square tests. Results. The presence or absence of erroneous computer interpretations of ischemia did not significantly affect residents' ECG interpretations (P=0.62). However, the residents whose ECGs included erroneous computer interpretations were more likely to recommend revascularization than the residents without (30% v. 10%, P= 0.01). Of those residents who read the ECG as diagnostic of ischemia, those with the erroneous computer interpretation were more likely to recommend revascularization than those without (54% v. 25%, P=0.048). Limitations. A single ECG was used. Conclusions. Erroneous computer interpretations of ECGs affected residents' clinical decision making in the absence of an effect on the actual interpretation of the ECG. Measuring the impact of computer misinterpretations by examining only physician interpretations will underestimate the effect of computer misinterpretations on clinical decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)372-376
Number of pages5
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2009

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Electrocardiography
Ischemia
Physicians
Emergency Medicine
Chi-Square Distribution
Internal Medicine
Teaching

Keywords

  • Computer-assisted test interpretation
  • Electrocardiogram interpretation
  • Medical errors
  • Physician decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

The effect of erroneous computer interpretation of ECGs on resident decision making. / Southern, William N.; Arnsten, Julia Hope.

In: Medical Decision Making, Vol. 29, No. 3, 05.2009, p. 372-376.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8e4e44aeb9954136a7d6f38097090de4,
title = "The effect of erroneous computer interpretation of ECGs on resident decision making",
abstract = "Background. The use of computer interpretations of electrocardiograms (ECGs) as an aid to physician interpretations is widespread. Computer misinterpretations are common and negatively affect physician interpretations. Objective. To measure the effect of computer ECG misinterpretations on clinical decision making. Design. Quasi-randomized trial. Setting. Resident teaching conferences. Participants. Included 105 internal and emergency medicine residents. Intervention. After a brief case presentation, residents were asked to interpret an ECG and choose appropriate management. Residents chose from a concealed stack of handouts; some contained an erroneous computer interpretation of the ECG (citing acute ischemia), and some contained no computer interpretation. Measurements. ECG interpretations and management decisions by residents whose ECG did or did not include an erroneous computer interpretation were compared using chi-square tests. Results. The presence or absence of erroneous computer interpretations of ischemia did not significantly affect residents' ECG interpretations (P=0.62). However, the residents whose ECGs included erroneous computer interpretations were more likely to recommend revascularization than the residents without (30{\%} v. 10{\%}, P= 0.01). Of those residents who read the ECG as diagnostic of ischemia, those with the erroneous computer interpretation were more likely to recommend revascularization than those without (54{\%} v. 25{\%}, P=0.048). Limitations. A single ECG was used. Conclusions. Erroneous computer interpretations of ECGs affected residents' clinical decision making in the absence of an effect on the actual interpretation of the ECG. Measuring the impact of computer misinterpretations by examining only physician interpretations will underestimate the effect of computer misinterpretations on clinical decision making.",
keywords = "Computer-assisted test interpretation, Electrocardiogram interpretation, Medical errors, Physician decision making",
author = "Southern, {William N.} and Arnsten, {Julia Hope}",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X09333125",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "372--376",
journal = "Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of erroneous computer interpretation of ECGs on resident decision making

AU - Southern, William N.

AU - Arnsten, Julia Hope

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - Background. The use of computer interpretations of electrocardiograms (ECGs) as an aid to physician interpretations is widespread. Computer misinterpretations are common and negatively affect physician interpretations. Objective. To measure the effect of computer ECG misinterpretations on clinical decision making. Design. Quasi-randomized trial. Setting. Resident teaching conferences. Participants. Included 105 internal and emergency medicine residents. Intervention. After a brief case presentation, residents were asked to interpret an ECG and choose appropriate management. Residents chose from a concealed stack of handouts; some contained an erroneous computer interpretation of the ECG (citing acute ischemia), and some contained no computer interpretation. Measurements. ECG interpretations and management decisions by residents whose ECG did or did not include an erroneous computer interpretation were compared using chi-square tests. Results. The presence or absence of erroneous computer interpretations of ischemia did not significantly affect residents' ECG interpretations (P=0.62). However, the residents whose ECGs included erroneous computer interpretations were more likely to recommend revascularization than the residents without (30% v. 10%, P= 0.01). Of those residents who read the ECG as diagnostic of ischemia, those with the erroneous computer interpretation were more likely to recommend revascularization than those without (54% v. 25%, P=0.048). Limitations. A single ECG was used. Conclusions. Erroneous computer interpretations of ECGs affected residents' clinical decision making in the absence of an effect on the actual interpretation of the ECG. Measuring the impact of computer misinterpretations by examining only physician interpretations will underestimate the effect of computer misinterpretations on clinical decision making.

AB - Background. The use of computer interpretations of electrocardiograms (ECGs) as an aid to physician interpretations is widespread. Computer misinterpretations are common and negatively affect physician interpretations. Objective. To measure the effect of computer ECG misinterpretations on clinical decision making. Design. Quasi-randomized trial. Setting. Resident teaching conferences. Participants. Included 105 internal and emergency medicine residents. Intervention. After a brief case presentation, residents were asked to interpret an ECG and choose appropriate management. Residents chose from a concealed stack of handouts; some contained an erroneous computer interpretation of the ECG (citing acute ischemia), and some contained no computer interpretation. Measurements. ECG interpretations and management decisions by residents whose ECG did or did not include an erroneous computer interpretation were compared using chi-square tests. Results. The presence or absence of erroneous computer interpretations of ischemia did not significantly affect residents' ECG interpretations (P=0.62). However, the residents whose ECGs included erroneous computer interpretations were more likely to recommend revascularization than the residents without (30% v. 10%, P= 0.01). Of those residents who read the ECG as diagnostic of ischemia, those with the erroneous computer interpretation were more likely to recommend revascularization than those without (54% v. 25%, P=0.048). Limitations. A single ECG was used. Conclusions. Erroneous computer interpretations of ECGs affected residents' clinical decision making in the absence of an effect on the actual interpretation of the ECG. Measuring the impact of computer misinterpretations by examining only physician interpretations will underestimate the effect of computer misinterpretations on clinical decision making.

KW - Computer-assisted test interpretation

KW - Electrocardiogram interpretation

KW - Medical errors

KW - Physician decision making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649238817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649238817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X09333125

DO - 10.1177/0272989X09333125

M3 - Article

C2 - 19470722

AN - SCOPUS:67649238817

VL - 29

SP - 372

EP - 376

JO - Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 3

ER -