The effect of corneal irregularity on astigmatism measurement by automated versus ray tracing keratometry

Hyun Cheol Roh, Roy S. Chuck, Jimmy K. Lee, Choul Yong Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of corneal irregularity on astigmatism assessment using automated keratometry (AK) (IOLMaster) versus ray tracing keratometry (Pentacam). This is an observational case series approved by the institutional review board of Dongguk University Hospital, Goyang, South Korea. A total of 207 eyes of 207 cataract patients were included. Preoperative corneal astigmatism was measured by both IOLMaster and Pentacam. Corneal irregularity index (IR) was calculated in Fourier analysis map of Pentacam. AK by IOLMaster and total corneal refractive power (TCRP, 3mm and 4mm zone analysis with pupil centered) by Pentacam were selected and the difference between the 2 measurements (delta Δ) was calculated using vector analysis. Ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) after cataract surgery was calculated by subtracting 6-month postoperative refractive astigmatism (RA) measurements from corresponding preoperative values (AK, TCRP3, and TCRP4). The mean irregularity index measured was 0.042±0.019mm (mean±standard deviation) and was positively correlated with age and magnitude of corneal astigmatism (P<0.001 and P<0.05). The difference (Δ) between TCRPs and AK (ΔTCRPs-AK) was 0.43±0.37 (TCRP3) and 0.39±0.35 (TCRP4) diopters. Linear regression analysis revealed that age (P<0.001), IR (P<0.001), and AK (P<0.001) were positively correlated with ΔTCRPs-AK. In highly irregular corneas (IR over 0.77 diopters: mean+2 standard deviation), postoperative ORAs calculated using TCRPs were significantly lower than ORAs calculated using AK. Corneal irregularities significantly impact astigmatism assessment by IOLMaster (AK) and Pentacam (TCRPs). Compared with AK, TCRPs were more accurate in predicting postoperative residual astigmatism in highly irregular corneas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere677
JournalMedicine (United States)
Volume94
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 6 2015

Fingerprint

Astigmatism
Cornea
Cataract
Republic of Korea
Research Ethics Committees
Fourier Analysis
Pupil
Linear Models
Regression Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The effect of corneal irregularity on astigmatism measurement by automated versus ray tracing keratometry. / Roh, Hyun Cheol; Chuck, Roy S.; Lee, Jimmy K.; Park, Choul Yong.

In: Medicine (United States), Vol. 94, No. 13, e677, 06.04.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{df7d35a18c8a416599fe99fe3588dc64,
title = "The effect of corneal irregularity on astigmatism measurement by automated versus ray tracing keratometry",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to compare the effect of corneal irregularity on astigmatism assessment using automated keratometry (AK) (IOLMaster) versus ray tracing keratometry (Pentacam). This is an observational case series approved by the institutional review board of Dongguk University Hospital, Goyang, South Korea. A total of 207 eyes of 207 cataract patients were included. Preoperative corneal astigmatism was measured by both IOLMaster and Pentacam. Corneal irregularity index (IR) was calculated in Fourier analysis map of Pentacam. AK by IOLMaster and total corneal refractive power (TCRP, 3mm and 4mm zone analysis with pupil centered) by Pentacam were selected and the difference between the 2 measurements (delta Δ) was calculated using vector analysis. Ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) after cataract surgery was calculated by subtracting 6-month postoperative refractive astigmatism (RA) measurements from corresponding preoperative values (AK, TCRP3, and TCRP4). The mean irregularity index measured was 0.042±0.019mm (mean±standard deviation) and was positively correlated with age and magnitude of corneal astigmatism (P<0.001 and P<0.05). The difference (Δ) between TCRPs and AK (ΔTCRPs-AK) was 0.43±0.37 (TCRP3) and 0.39±0.35 (TCRP4) diopters. Linear regression analysis revealed that age (P<0.001), IR (P<0.001), and AK (P<0.001) were positively correlated with ΔTCRPs-AK. In highly irregular corneas (IR over 0.77 diopters: mean+2 standard deviation), postoperative ORAs calculated using TCRPs were significantly lower than ORAs calculated using AK. Corneal irregularities significantly impact astigmatism assessment by IOLMaster (AK) and Pentacam (TCRPs). Compared with AK, TCRPs were more accurate in predicting postoperative residual astigmatism in highly irregular corneas.",
author = "Roh, {Hyun Cheol} and Chuck, {Roy S.} and Lee, {Jimmy K.} and Park, {Choul Yong}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1097/MD.0000000000000677",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
journal = "Medicine; analytical reviews of general medicine, neurology, psychiatry, dermatology, and pediatries",
issn = "0025-7974",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of corneal irregularity on astigmatism measurement by automated versus ray tracing keratometry

AU - Roh, Hyun Cheol

AU - Chuck, Roy S.

AU - Lee, Jimmy K.

AU - Park, Choul Yong

PY - 2015/4/6

Y1 - 2015/4/6

N2 - The aim of this study was to compare the effect of corneal irregularity on astigmatism assessment using automated keratometry (AK) (IOLMaster) versus ray tracing keratometry (Pentacam). This is an observational case series approved by the institutional review board of Dongguk University Hospital, Goyang, South Korea. A total of 207 eyes of 207 cataract patients were included. Preoperative corneal astigmatism was measured by both IOLMaster and Pentacam. Corneal irregularity index (IR) was calculated in Fourier analysis map of Pentacam. AK by IOLMaster and total corneal refractive power (TCRP, 3mm and 4mm zone analysis with pupil centered) by Pentacam were selected and the difference between the 2 measurements (delta Δ) was calculated using vector analysis. Ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) after cataract surgery was calculated by subtracting 6-month postoperative refractive astigmatism (RA) measurements from corresponding preoperative values (AK, TCRP3, and TCRP4). The mean irregularity index measured was 0.042±0.019mm (mean±standard deviation) and was positively correlated with age and magnitude of corneal astigmatism (P<0.001 and P<0.05). The difference (Δ) between TCRPs and AK (ΔTCRPs-AK) was 0.43±0.37 (TCRP3) and 0.39±0.35 (TCRP4) diopters. Linear regression analysis revealed that age (P<0.001), IR (P<0.001), and AK (P<0.001) were positively correlated with ΔTCRPs-AK. In highly irregular corneas (IR over 0.77 diopters: mean+2 standard deviation), postoperative ORAs calculated using TCRPs were significantly lower than ORAs calculated using AK. Corneal irregularities significantly impact astigmatism assessment by IOLMaster (AK) and Pentacam (TCRPs). Compared with AK, TCRPs were more accurate in predicting postoperative residual astigmatism in highly irregular corneas.

AB - The aim of this study was to compare the effect of corneal irregularity on astigmatism assessment using automated keratometry (AK) (IOLMaster) versus ray tracing keratometry (Pentacam). This is an observational case series approved by the institutional review board of Dongguk University Hospital, Goyang, South Korea. A total of 207 eyes of 207 cataract patients were included. Preoperative corneal astigmatism was measured by both IOLMaster and Pentacam. Corneal irregularity index (IR) was calculated in Fourier analysis map of Pentacam. AK by IOLMaster and total corneal refractive power (TCRP, 3mm and 4mm zone analysis with pupil centered) by Pentacam were selected and the difference between the 2 measurements (delta Δ) was calculated using vector analysis. Ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) after cataract surgery was calculated by subtracting 6-month postoperative refractive astigmatism (RA) measurements from corresponding preoperative values (AK, TCRP3, and TCRP4). The mean irregularity index measured was 0.042±0.019mm (mean±standard deviation) and was positively correlated with age and magnitude of corneal astigmatism (P<0.001 and P<0.05). The difference (Δ) between TCRPs and AK (ΔTCRPs-AK) was 0.43±0.37 (TCRP3) and 0.39±0.35 (TCRP4) diopters. Linear regression analysis revealed that age (P<0.001), IR (P<0.001), and AK (P<0.001) were positively correlated with ΔTCRPs-AK. In highly irregular corneas (IR over 0.77 diopters: mean+2 standard deviation), postoperative ORAs calculated using TCRPs were significantly lower than ORAs calculated using AK. Corneal irregularities significantly impact astigmatism assessment by IOLMaster (AK) and Pentacam (TCRPs). Compared with AK, TCRPs were more accurate in predicting postoperative residual astigmatism in highly irregular corneas.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929501055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929501055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MD.0000000000000677

DO - 10.1097/MD.0000000000000677

M3 - Article

VL - 94

JO - Medicine; analytical reviews of general medicine, neurology, psychiatry, dermatology, and pediatries

JF - Medicine; analytical reviews of general medicine, neurology, psychiatry, dermatology, and pediatries

SN - 0025-7974

IS - 13

M1 - e677

ER -