The contributions of epidemiology to the understanding of childhood seizures and epilepsy.

A. T. Berg, S. Shinnar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Up through the 1960s, studies of epilepsy were based on patients seen in tertiary referral centers, many of whom had refractory epilepsy. Based on these early studies, epilepsy was believed to be a chronic, progressive, and incurable disorder. Seizures were thought to cause damage and result in further seizures. Clinical management of children with seizures reflected these beliefs. Over the last 25 to 30 years, epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that, contrary to these earlier beliefs, the prognosis of most childhood seizures and epilepsy is excellent. Prognosis is largely determined by the underlying etiology and not the seizures themselves. The differences in the assessment of the prognosis of seizures derived from the earlier studies versus the later epidemiologic studies are largely due to several biases that occurred in the earlier studies. These biases are explained. Several examples are provided of how the epidemiologic studies have greatly altered the prevailing views regarding the prognosis of seizures, and, by doing so, the management of seizures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-26
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Child Neurology
Volume9 Suppl 2
StatePublished - Oct 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Epilepsy
Epidemiology
Seizures
Epidemiologic Studies
Tertiary Care Centers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

The contributions of epidemiology to the understanding of childhood seizures and epilepsy. / Berg, A. T.; Shinnar, S.

In: Journal of Child Neurology, Vol. 9 Suppl 2, 10.1994, p. 19-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2fbb6f30b69943179ab6694d45222594,
title = "The contributions of epidemiology to the understanding of childhood seizures and epilepsy.",
abstract = "Up through the 1960s, studies of epilepsy were based on patients seen in tertiary referral centers, many of whom had refractory epilepsy. Based on these early studies, epilepsy was believed to be a chronic, progressive, and incurable disorder. Seizures were thought to cause damage and result in further seizures. Clinical management of children with seizures reflected these beliefs. Over the last 25 to 30 years, epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that, contrary to these earlier beliefs, the prognosis of most childhood seizures and epilepsy is excellent. Prognosis is largely determined by the underlying etiology and not the seizures themselves. The differences in the assessment of the prognosis of seizures derived from the earlier studies versus the later epidemiologic studies are largely due to several biases that occurred in the earlier studies. These biases are explained. Several examples are provided of how the epidemiologic studies have greatly altered the prevailing views regarding the prognosis of seizures, and, by doing so, the management of seizures.",
author = "Berg, {A. T.} and S. Shinnar",
year = "1994",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9 Suppl 2",
pages = "19--26",
journal = "Journal of Child Neurology",
issn = "0883-0738",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The contributions of epidemiology to the understanding of childhood seizures and epilepsy.

AU - Berg, A. T.

AU - Shinnar, S.

PY - 1994/10

Y1 - 1994/10

N2 - Up through the 1960s, studies of epilepsy were based on patients seen in tertiary referral centers, many of whom had refractory epilepsy. Based on these early studies, epilepsy was believed to be a chronic, progressive, and incurable disorder. Seizures were thought to cause damage and result in further seizures. Clinical management of children with seizures reflected these beliefs. Over the last 25 to 30 years, epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that, contrary to these earlier beliefs, the prognosis of most childhood seizures and epilepsy is excellent. Prognosis is largely determined by the underlying etiology and not the seizures themselves. The differences in the assessment of the prognosis of seizures derived from the earlier studies versus the later epidemiologic studies are largely due to several biases that occurred in the earlier studies. These biases are explained. Several examples are provided of how the epidemiologic studies have greatly altered the prevailing views regarding the prognosis of seizures, and, by doing so, the management of seizures.

AB - Up through the 1960s, studies of epilepsy were based on patients seen in tertiary referral centers, many of whom had refractory epilepsy. Based on these early studies, epilepsy was believed to be a chronic, progressive, and incurable disorder. Seizures were thought to cause damage and result in further seizures. Clinical management of children with seizures reflected these beliefs. Over the last 25 to 30 years, epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that, contrary to these earlier beliefs, the prognosis of most childhood seizures and epilepsy is excellent. Prognosis is largely determined by the underlying etiology and not the seizures themselves. The differences in the assessment of the prognosis of seizures derived from the earlier studies versus the later epidemiologic studies are largely due to several biases that occurred in the earlier studies. These biases are explained. Several examples are provided of how the epidemiologic studies have greatly altered the prevailing views regarding the prognosis of seizures, and, by doing so, the management of seizures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028528278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028528278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 9 Suppl 2

SP - 19

EP - 26

JO - Journal of Child Neurology

JF - Journal of Child Neurology

SN - 0883-0738

ER -