The accuracy of computed tomography in the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis

Neil Bhattacharyya, Marvin P. Fried

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

123 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Study Design: Prospective dual cohort study. Methods: One hundred seventy-one consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for CRS were evaluated with CT and staged according to the Lund system. Histopathological findings from sinus specimens were reviewed and graded. A second contemporaneous control group of 130 patients undergoing CT of the sinus regions for other reasons but without a diagnosis of CRS was also staged. Sensitivity, specificity, and the receiver-operator characteristic were determined for the sinus CT in the diagnosis of CRS. Positive and negative predictive values were also computed. Results: In the disease-positive group of patients with CRS, the mean Lund score was 9.8 (95% confidence interval, 9.0-10.6). The mean inflammatory grade on histopathological study was 2.3 (range, 0-4). For the control group (without disease), the mean Lund score was 4.3 (95% confidence interval, 3.5-5.0). The AUC for the receiver-operator characteristic was 0.802 (P <.001). Selecting a Lund score cut-off value of greater than 2 as abnormal, the sinus CT exhibited sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 41%, respectively. Increasing the cut-off value to 4 changed the sensitivity and specificity to 85% and 59%, respectively. Conclusions: The paranasal sinus CT scan exhibits good sensitivity and above-average specificity for the diagnosis of CRS. When added to the history and physical findings, CT may add to the diagnostic accuracy of CRS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)125-129
Number of pages5
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume113
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Tomography
Sensitivity and Specificity
Paranasal Sinuses
Confidence Intervals
Control Groups
Area Under Curve
Cohort Studies
History
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Chronic rhinosinusitis
  • Computed tomogra
  • Diagnosis
  • Phy
  • Sensitivity
  • Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

The accuracy of computed tomography in the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis. / Bhattacharyya, Neil; Fried, Marvin P.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 113, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 125-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4ff1b050100e4856a86bcb6af7b956f1,
title = "The accuracy of computed tomography in the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis",
abstract = "Objective: To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Study Design: Prospective dual cohort study. Methods: One hundred seventy-one consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for CRS were evaluated with CT and staged according to the Lund system. Histopathological findings from sinus specimens were reviewed and graded. A second contemporaneous control group of 130 patients undergoing CT of the sinus regions for other reasons but without a diagnosis of CRS was also staged. Sensitivity, specificity, and the receiver-operator characteristic were determined for the sinus CT in the diagnosis of CRS. Positive and negative predictive values were also computed. Results: In the disease-positive group of patients with CRS, the mean Lund score was 9.8 (95{\%} confidence interval, 9.0-10.6). The mean inflammatory grade on histopathological study was 2.3 (range, 0-4). For the control group (without disease), the mean Lund score was 4.3 (95{\%} confidence interval, 3.5-5.0). The AUC for the receiver-operator characteristic was 0.802 (P <.001). Selecting a Lund score cut-off value of greater than 2 as abnormal, the sinus CT exhibited sensitivity and specificity of 94{\%} and 41{\%}, respectively. Increasing the cut-off value to 4 changed the sensitivity and specificity to 85{\%} and 59{\%}, respectively. Conclusions: The paranasal sinus CT scan exhibits good sensitivity and above-average specificity for the diagnosis of CRS. When added to the history and physical findings, CT may add to the diagnostic accuracy of CRS.",
keywords = "Chronic rhinosinusitis, Computed tomogra, Diagnosis, Phy, Sensitivity, Specificity",
author = "Neil Bhattacharyya and Fried, {Marvin P.}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00005537-200301000-00023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
pages = "125--129",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The accuracy of computed tomography in the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis

AU - Bhattacharyya, Neil

AU - Fried, Marvin P.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Objective: To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Study Design: Prospective dual cohort study. Methods: One hundred seventy-one consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for CRS were evaluated with CT and staged according to the Lund system. Histopathological findings from sinus specimens were reviewed and graded. A second contemporaneous control group of 130 patients undergoing CT of the sinus regions for other reasons but without a diagnosis of CRS was also staged. Sensitivity, specificity, and the receiver-operator characteristic were determined for the sinus CT in the diagnosis of CRS. Positive and negative predictive values were also computed. Results: In the disease-positive group of patients with CRS, the mean Lund score was 9.8 (95% confidence interval, 9.0-10.6). The mean inflammatory grade on histopathological study was 2.3 (range, 0-4). For the control group (without disease), the mean Lund score was 4.3 (95% confidence interval, 3.5-5.0). The AUC for the receiver-operator characteristic was 0.802 (P <.001). Selecting a Lund score cut-off value of greater than 2 as abnormal, the sinus CT exhibited sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 41%, respectively. Increasing the cut-off value to 4 changed the sensitivity and specificity to 85% and 59%, respectively. Conclusions: The paranasal sinus CT scan exhibits good sensitivity and above-average specificity for the diagnosis of CRS. When added to the history and physical findings, CT may add to the diagnostic accuracy of CRS.

AB - Objective: To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Study Design: Prospective dual cohort study. Methods: One hundred seventy-one consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for CRS were evaluated with CT and staged according to the Lund system. Histopathological findings from sinus specimens were reviewed and graded. A second contemporaneous control group of 130 patients undergoing CT of the sinus regions for other reasons but without a diagnosis of CRS was also staged. Sensitivity, specificity, and the receiver-operator characteristic were determined for the sinus CT in the diagnosis of CRS. Positive and negative predictive values were also computed. Results: In the disease-positive group of patients with CRS, the mean Lund score was 9.8 (95% confidence interval, 9.0-10.6). The mean inflammatory grade on histopathological study was 2.3 (range, 0-4). For the control group (without disease), the mean Lund score was 4.3 (95% confidence interval, 3.5-5.0). The AUC for the receiver-operator characteristic was 0.802 (P <.001). Selecting a Lund score cut-off value of greater than 2 as abnormal, the sinus CT exhibited sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 41%, respectively. Increasing the cut-off value to 4 changed the sensitivity and specificity to 85% and 59%, respectively. Conclusions: The paranasal sinus CT scan exhibits good sensitivity and above-average specificity for the diagnosis of CRS. When added to the history and physical findings, CT may add to the diagnostic accuracy of CRS.

KW - Chronic rhinosinusitis

KW - Computed tomogra

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Phy

KW - Sensitivity

KW - Specificity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037220736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037220736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005537-200301000-00023

DO - 10.1097/00005537-200301000-00023

M3 - Article

VL - 113

SP - 125

EP - 129

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 1

ER -