Temporal integration: Intentional sound discrimination does not modulate stimulus-driven processes in auditory event synthesis

Elyse S. Sussman, István Winkler, Judith Kreuzer, Marieke Saher, Risto Näätänen, Walter Ritter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Our previous study showed that the auditory context could influence whether two successive acoustic changes occurring within the temporal integration window (approximately 200ms) were pre-attentively encoded as a single auditory event or as two discrete events (Cogn Brain Res 12 (2001) 431). The aim of the current study was to assess whether top-down processes could influence the stimulus-driven processes in determining what constitutes an auditory event. Methods: Electroencepholagram (EEG) was recorded from 11 scalp electrodes to frequently occurring standard and infrequently occurring deviant sounds. Within the stimulus blocks, deviants either occurred only in pairs (successive feature changes) or both singly and in pairs. Event-related potential indices of change and target detection, the mismatch negativity (MMN) and the N2b component, respectively, were compared with the simultaneously measured performance in discriminating the deviants. Results: Even though subjects could voluntarily distinguish the two successive auditory feature changes from each other, which was also indicated by the elicitation of the N2b target-detection response, top-down processes did not modify the event organization reflected by the MMN response. Conclusions: Top-down processes can extract elemental auditory information from a single integrated acoustic event, but the extraction occurs at a later processing stage than the one whose outcome is indexed by MMN. Significance: Initial processes of auditory event-formation are fully governed by the context within which the sounds occur. Perception of the deviants as two separate sound events (the top-down effects) did not change the initial neural representation of the same deviants as one event (indexed by the MMN), without a corresponding change in the stimulus-driven sound organization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1909-1920
Number of pages12
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
Volume113
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2002

Fingerprint

Acoustics
Scalp
Evoked Potentials
Electrodes
Brain

Keywords

  • Auditory event formation
  • Auditory perception
  • Event-related potentials
  • Mismatch negativity
  • Stimulus-driven
  • Temporal integration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Neurology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Temporal integration : Intentional sound discrimination does not modulate stimulus-driven processes in auditory event synthesis. / Sussman, Elyse S.; Winkler, István; Kreuzer, Judith; Saher, Marieke; Näätänen, Risto; Ritter, Walter.

In: Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 113, No. 12, 12.2002, p. 1909-1920.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sussman, Elyse S. ; Winkler, István ; Kreuzer, Judith ; Saher, Marieke ; Näätänen, Risto ; Ritter, Walter. / Temporal integration : Intentional sound discrimination does not modulate stimulus-driven processes in auditory event synthesis. In: Clinical Neurophysiology. 2002 ; Vol. 113, No. 12. pp. 1909-1920.
@article{efa7d1b305e346c784a77c4e4af7b496,
title = "Temporal integration: Intentional sound discrimination does not modulate stimulus-driven processes in auditory event synthesis",
abstract = "Objective: Our previous study showed that the auditory context could influence whether two successive acoustic changes occurring within the temporal integration window (approximately 200ms) were pre-attentively encoded as a single auditory event or as two discrete events (Cogn Brain Res 12 (2001) 431). The aim of the current study was to assess whether top-down processes could influence the stimulus-driven processes in determining what constitutes an auditory event. Methods: Electroencepholagram (EEG) was recorded from 11 scalp electrodes to frequently occurring standard and infrequently occurring deviant sounds. Within the stimulus blocks, deviants either occurred only in pairs (successive feature changes) or both singly and in pairs. Event-related potential indices of change and target detection, the mismatch negativity (MMN) and the N2b component, respectively, were compared with the simultaneously measured performance in discriminating the deviants. Results: Even though subjects could voluntarily distinguish the two successive auditory feature changes from each other, which was also indicated by the elicitation of the N2b target-detection response, top-down processes did not modify the event organization reflected by the MMN response. Conclusions: Top-down processes can extract elemental auditory information from a single integrated acoustic event, but the extraction occurs at a later processing stage than the one whose outcome is indexed by MMN. Significance: Initial processes of auditory event-formation are fully governed by the context within which the sounds occur. Perception of the deviants as two separate sound events (the top-down effects) did not change the initial neural representation of the same deviants as one event (indexed by the MMN), without a corresponding change in the stimulus-driven sound organization.",
keywords = "Auditory event formation, Auditory perception, Event-related potentials, Mismatch negativity, Stimulus-driven, Temporal integration",
author = "Sussman, {Elyse S.} and Istv{\'a}n Winkler and Judith Kreuzer and Marieke Saher and Risto N{\"a}{\"a}t{\"a}nen and Walter Ritter",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00300-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
pages = "1909--1920",
journal = "Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "1388-2457",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temporal integration

T2 - Intentional sound discrimination does not modulate stimulus-driven processes in auditory event synthesis

AU - Sussman, Elyse S.

AU - Winkler, István

AU - Kreuzer, Judith

AU - Saher, Marieke

AU - Näätänen, Risto

AU - Ritter, Walter

PY - 2002/12

Y1 - 2002/12

N2 - Objective: Our previous study showed that the auditory context could influence whether two successive acoustic changes occurring within the temporal integration window (approximately 200ms) were pre-attentively encoded as a single auditory event or as two discrete events (Cogn Brain Res 12 (2001) 431). The aim of the current study was to assess whether top-down processes could influence the stimulus-driven processes in determining what constitutes an auditory event. Methods: Electroencepholagram (EEG) was recorded from 11 scalp electrodes to frequently occurring standard and infrequently occurring deviant sounds. Within the stimulus blocks, deviants either occurred only in pairs (successive feature changes) or both singly and in pairs. Event-related potential indices of change and target detection, the mismatch negativity (MMN) and the N2b component, respectively, were compared with the simultaneously measured performance in discriminating the deviants. Results: Even though subjects could voluntarily distinguish the two successive auditory feature changes from each other, which was also indicated by the elicitation of the N2b target-detection response, top-down processes did not modify the event organization reflected by the MMN response. Conclusions: Top-down processes can extract elemental auditory information from a single integrated acoustic event, but the extraction occurs at a later processing stage than the one whose outcome is indexed by MMN. Significance: Initial processes of auditory event-formation are fully governed by the context within which the sounds occur. Perception of the deviants as two separate sound events (the top-down effects) did not change the initial neural representation of the same deviants as one event (indexed by the MMN), without a corresponding change in the stimulus-driven sound organization.

AB - Objective: Our previous study showed that the auditory context could influence whether two successive acoustic changes occurring within the temporal integration window (approximately 200ms) were pre-attentively encoded as a single auditory event or as two discrete events (Cogn Brain Res 12 (2001) 431). The aim of the current study was to assess whether top-down processes could influence the stimulus-driven processes in determining what constitutes an auditory event. Methods: Electroencepholagram (EEG) was recorded from 11 scalp electrodes to frequently occurring standard and infrequently occurring deviant sounds. Within the stimulus blocks, deviants either occurred only in pairs (successive feature changes) or both singly and in pairs. Event-related potential indices of change and target detection, the mismatch negativity (MMN) and the N2b component, respectively, were compared with the simultaneously measured performance in discriminating the deviants. Results: Even though subjects could voluntarily distinguish the two successive auditory feature changes from each other, which was also indicated by the elicitation of the N2b target-detection response, top-down processes did not modify the event organization reflected by the MMN response. Conclusions: Top-down processes can extract elemental auditory information from a single integrated acoustic event, but the extraction occurs at a later processing stage than the one whose outcome is indexed by MMN. Significance: Initial processes of auditory event-formation are fully governed by the context within which the sounds occur. Perception of the deviants as two separate sound events (the top-down effects) did not change the initial neural representation of the same deviants as one event (indexed by the MMN), without a corresponding change in the stimulus-driven sound organization.

KW - Auditory event formation

KW - Auditory perception

KW - Event-related potentials

KW - Mismatch negativity

KW - Stimulus-driven

KW - Temporal integration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036899128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036899128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00300-0

DO - 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00300-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 12464328

AN - SCOPUS:0036899128

VL - 113

SP - 1909

EP - 1920

JO - Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 1388-2457

IS - 12

ER -