Targeting Rejection: Analysis of Specimen Acceptability and Rejection, and Framework for Identifying Interventions in a Single Tertiary Healthcare Facility

Lisa Rooper, Jamal H. Carter, John Hargrove, Sheri Hoffmann, Stefan Riedel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Assessment of specimen rejection rates is an important laboratory quality measure for laboratories because of a potential negative impact on patient care. Here, we examined reasons for specimen rejection at a single, tertiary care healthcare institution and propose a framework for designing an efficient intervention. Methods: During a 1-year period, we identified all specimens rejected at our hospital and performed an analysis of a wide range of associated variables: reason for rejection, patient location, type of phlebotomist, tests ordered, priority status, collection container used, transport time. Results: Clotted and hemolyzed specimens accounted for the majority of rejected specimens, but significant differences in reasons for specimen rejection existed between patient care areas. Eighty-five percent of rejected specimens came from the Emergency Department and eight other inpatient care areas. Registered nurses drew approximately 85% of rejected specimens, while laboratory phlebotomy staff drew only 4%. Conclusions: While hemolysis and clotting are primary causes for specimen rejection, collection of all available data regarding specimen rejection data is essential for laboratories determining which factors are most significant causes of specimen rejection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere22060
JournalJournal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tertiary Healthcare
Patient Care
Specimen Handling
Phlebotomy
Hemolysis
Containers
Hospital Emergency Service
Inpatients
Nurses

Keywords

  • laboratory management
  • laboratory quality assurance
  • specimen rejection rate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Hematology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Medical Laboratory Technology
  • Biochemistry, medical
  • Microbiology (medical)

Cite this

Targeting Rejection : Analysis of Specimen Acceptability and Rejection, and Framework for Identifying Interventions in a Single Tertiary Healthcare Facility. / Rooper, Lisa; Carter, Jamal H.; Hargrove, John; Hoffmann, Sheri; Riedel, Stefan.

In: Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, Vol. 31, No. 3, e22060, 01.05.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{813379719c0e4defb7187dda3d18d874,
title = "Targeting Rejection: Analysis of Specimen Acceptability and Rejection, and Framework for Identifying Interventions in a Single Tertiary Healthcare Facility",
abstract = "Objectives: Assessment of specimen rejection rates is an important laboratory quality measure for laboratories because of a potential negative impact on patient care. Here, we examined reasons for specimen rejection at a single, tertiary care healthcare institution and propose a framework for designing an efficient intervention. Methods: During a 1-year period, we identified all specimens rejected at our hospital and performed an analysis of a wide range of associated variables: reason for rejection, patient location, type of phlebotomist, tests ordered, priority status, collection container used, transport time. Results: Clotted and hemolyzed specimens accounted for the majority of rejected specimens, but significant differences in reasons for specimen rejection existed between patient care areas. Eighty-five percent of rejected specimens came from the Emergency Department and eight other inpatient care areas. Registered nurses drew approximately 85{\%} of rejected specimens, while laboratory phlebotomy staff drew only 4{\%}. Conclusions: While hemolysis and clotting are primary causes for specimen rejection, collection of all available data regarding specimen rejection data is essential for laboratories determining which factors are most significant causes of specimen rejection.",
keywords = "laboratory management, laboratory quality assurance, specimen rejection rate",
author = "Lisa Rooper and Carter, {Jamal H.} and John Hargrove and Sheri Hoffmann and Stefan Riedel",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jcla.22060",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis",
issn = "0887-8013",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Targeting Rejection

T2 - Analysis of Specimen Acceptability and Rejection, and Framework for Identifying Interventions in a Single Tertiary Healthcare Facility

AU - Rooper, Lisa

AU - Carter, Jamal H.

AU - Hargrove, John

AU - Hoffmann, Sheri

AU - Riedel, Stefan

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Objectives: Assessment of specimen rejection rates is an important laboratory quality measure for laboratories because of a potential negative impact on patient care. Here, we examined reasons for specimen rejection at a single, tertiary care healthcare institution and propose a framework for designing an efficient intervention. Methods: During a 1-year period, we identified all specimens rejected at our hospital and performed an analysis of a wide range of associated variables: reason for rejection, patient location, type of phlebotomist, tests ordered, priority status, collection container used, transport time. Results: Clotted and hemolyzed specimens accounted for the majority of rejected specimens, but significant differences in reasons for specimen rejection existed between patient care areas. Eighty-five percent of rejected specimens came from the Emergency Department and eight other inpatient care areas. Registered nurses drew approximately 85% of rejected specimens, while laboratory phlebotomy staff drew only 4%. Conclusions: While hemolysis and clotting are primary causes for specimen rejection, collection of all available data regarding specimen rejection data is essential for laboratories determining which factors are most significant causes of specimen rejection.

AB - Objectives: Assessment of specimen rejection rates is an important laboratory quality measure for laboratories because of a potential negative impact on patient care. Here, we examined reasons for specimen rejection at a single, tertiary care healthcare institution and propose a framework for designing an efficient intervention. Methods: During a 1-year period, we identified all specimens rejected at our hospital and performed an analysis of a wide range of associated variables: reason for rejection, patient location, type of phlebotomist, tests ordered, priority status, collection container used, transport time. Results: Clotted and hemolyzed specimens accounted for the majority of rejected specimens, but significant differences in reasons for specimen rejection existed between patient care areas. Eighty-five percent of rejected specimens came from the Emergency Department and eight other inpatient care areas. Registered nurses drew approximately 85% of rejected specimens, while laboratory phlebotomy staff drew only 4%. Conclusions: While hemolysis and clotting are primary causes for specimen rejection, collection of all available data regarding specimen rejection data is essential for laboratories determining which factors are most significant causes of specimen rejection.

KW - laboratory management

KW - laboratory quality assurance

KW - specimen rejection rate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994018039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994018039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jcla.22060

DO - 10.1002/jcla.22060

M3 - Article

C2 - 27629723

AN - SCOPUS:84994018039

VL - 31

JO - Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis

JF - Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis

SN - 0887-8013

IS - 3

M1 - e22060

ER -