Taking the provider “out of the loop:” patients’ and physicians’ perspectives about IUD self-removal

Jennifer R. Amico, Ariana H. Bennett, Alison Karasz, Marji Gold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: This study describes the perspectives of patients and providers about intrauterine device (IUD) self-removal. Study design: This qualitative study is a subanalysis of two datasets from a single project, which included semistructured individual interviews with 15 patients and 12 physicians. We derived the data for this analysis from portions of the interviews pertaining to IUD self-removal and provider removal. We analyzed data using deductive and inductive techniques to perform content and thematic analyses. Results: The majority of patients and physicians cited both concerns about and potential benefits of IUD self-removal. Patients cited concerns about safety as the reason they did not wish to remove their own IUD, but physicians did not share these concerns; instead, physicians were apprehensive about not being involved in the discussion to remove the IUD. Both patients and physicians valued having the provider “in the loop” and reported fears about hasty or coerced removal. Conclusions: IUD self-removal is an option that some patients may be interested in. Addressing concerns about safety may make self-removal more appealing to some patients. Addressing physicians’ concern about “hasty” removal may require additional training so that providers are better able to support patients’ decision making around contraceptive use. Implications: The option of self-removal could have a positive impact on reproductive autonomy and patient decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)288-291
Number of pages4
JournalContraception
Volume98
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Device Removal
Intrauterine Devices
Physicians
Decision Making
Interviews
Safety
Contraceptive Agents
Fear

Keywords

  • Discontinuation
  • Family medicine center
  • Intrauterine device
  • Qualitative
  • Self-removal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Taking the provider “out of the loop:” patients’ and physicians’ perspectives about IUD self-removal. / Amico, Jennifer R.; Bennett, Ariana H.; Karasz, Alison; Gold, Marji.

In: Contraception, Vol. 98, No. 4, 01.10.2018, p. 288-291.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b7206c44457e4aea93c5544fccd851b1,
title = "Taking the provider “out of the loop:” patients’ and physicians’ perspectives about IUD self-removal",
abstract = "Objective: This study describes the perspectives of patients and providers about intrauterine device (IUD) self-removal. Study design: This qualitative study is a subanalysis of two datasets from a single project, which included semistructured individual interviews with 15 patients and 12 physicians. We derived the data for this analysis from portions of the interviews pertaining to IUD self-removal and provider removal. We analyzed data using deductive and inductive techniques to perform content and thematic analyses. Results: The majority of patients and physicians cited both concerns about and potential benefits of IUD self-removal. Patients cited concerns about safety as the reason they did not wish to remove their own IUD, but physicians did not share these concerns; instead, physicians were apprehensive about not being involved in the discussion to remove the IUD. Both patients and physicians valued having the provider “in the loop” and reported fears about hasty or coerced removal. Conclusions: IUD self-removal is an option that some patients may be interested in. Addressing concerns about safety may make self-removal more appealing to some patients. Addressing physicians’ concern about “hasty” removal may require additional training so that providers are better able to support patients’ decision making around contraceptive use. Implications: The option of self-removal could have a positive impact on reproductive autonomy and patient decision making.",
keywords = "Discontinuation, Family medicine center, Intrauterine device, Qualitative, Self-removal",
author = "Amico, {Jennifer R.} and Bennett, {Ariana H.} and Alison Karasz and Marji Gold",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2018.05.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "98",
pages = "288--291",
journal = "Contraception",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taking the provider “out of the loop:” patients’ and physicians’ perspectives about IUD self-removal

AU - Amico, Jennifer R.

AU - Bennett, Ariana H.

AU - Karasz, Alison

AU - Gold, Marji

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Objective: This study describes the perspectives of patients and providers about intrauterine device (IUD) self-removal. Study design: This qualitative study is a subanalysis of two datasets from a single project, which included semistructured individual interviews with 15 patients and 12 physicians. We derived the data for this analysis from portions of the interviews pertaining to IUD self-removal and provider removal. We analyzed data using deductive and inductive techniques to perform content and thematic analyses. Results: The majority of patients and physicians cited both concerns about and potential benefits of IUD self-removal. Patients cited concerns about safety as the reason they did not wish to remove their own IUD, but physicians did not share these concerns; instead, physicians were apprehensive about not being involved in the discussion to remove the IUD. Both patients and physicians valued having the provider “in the loop” and reported fears about hasty or coerced removal. Conclusions: IUD self-removal is an option that some patients may be interested in. Addressing concerns about safety may make self-removal more appealing to some patients. Addressing physicians’ concern about “hasty” removal may require additional training so that providers are better able to support patients’ decision making around contraceptive use. Implications: The option of self-removal could have a positive impact on reproductive autonomy and patient decision making.

AB - Objective: This study describes the perspectives of patients and providers about intrauterine device (IUD) self-removal. Study design: This qualitative study is a subanalysis of two datasets from a single project, which included semistructured individual interviews with 15 patients and 12 physicians. We derived the data for this analysis from portions of the interviews pertaining to IUD self-removal and provider removal. We analyzed data using deductive and inductive techniques to perform content and thematic analyses. Results: The majority of patients and physicians cited both concerns about and potential benefits of IUD self-removal. Patients cited concerns about safety as the reason they did not wish to remove their own IUD, but physicians did not share these concerns; instead, physicians were apprehensive about not being involved in the discussion to remove the IUD. Both patients and physicians valued having the provider “in the loop” and reported fears about hasty or coerced removal. Conclusions: IUD self-removal is an option that some patients may be interested in. Addressing concerns about safety may make self-removal more appealing to some patients. Addressing physicians’ concern about “hasty” removal may require additional training so that providers are better able to support patients’ decision making around contraceptive use. Implications: The option of self-removal could have a positive impact on reproductive autonomy and patient decision making.

KW - Discontinuation

KW - Family medicine center

KW - Intrauterine device

KW - Qualitative

KW - Self-removal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049782401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049782401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.05.021

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.05.021

M3 - Article

C2 - 29870685

AN - SCOPUS:85049782401

VL - 98

SP - 288

EP - 291

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

SN - 0010-7824

IS - 4

ER -