Systematic review of frequency of felt and enacted stigma in epilepsy and determining factors and attitudes toward persons living with epilepsy—Report from the International League Against Epilepsy Task Force on Stigma in Epilepsy

Churl Su Kwon, Ann Jacoby, Amza Ali, Joan Austin, Gretchen L. Birbeck, Patricia Braga, J. Helen Cross, Hanneke de Boer, Tarun Dua, Paula T. Fernandes, Kirsten M. Fiest, Jonathan Goldstein, Sheryl Haut, Diane Lorenzetti, Janet Mifsud, Solomon Moshe, Karen L. Parko, Manjari Tripathi, Samuel Wiebe, Nathalie Jette

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To review the evidence of felt and enacted stigma and attitudes toward persons living with epilepsy, and their determining factors. Methods: Thirteen databases were searched (1985–2019). Abstracts were reviewed in duplicate and data were independently extracted using a standardized form. Studies were characterized using descriptive analysis by whether they addressed “felt” or “enacted” stigma and “attitudes” toward persons living with epilepsy. Results: Of 4234 abstracts, 132 met eligibility criteria and addressed either felt or enacted stigma and 210 attitudes toward epilepsy. Stigma frequency ranged broadly between regions. Factors associated with enacted stigma included low level of knowledge about epilepsy, lower educational level, lower socioeconomic status, rural areas living, and religious grouping. Negative stereotypes were often internalized by persons with epilepsy, who saw themselves as having an “undesirable difference” and so anticipated being treated differently. Felt stigma was associated with increased risk of psychological difficulties and impaired quality of life. Felt stigma was linked to higher seizure frequency, recency of seizures, younger age at epilepsy onset or longer duration, lower educational level, poorer knowledge about epilepsy, and younger age. An important finding was the potential contribution of epilepsy terminology to the production of stigma. Negative attitudes toward those with epilepsy were described in 100% of included studies, and originated in any population group (students, teachers, healthcare professionals, general public, and those living with epilepsy). Better attitudes were generally noted in those of younger age or higher educational status. Significance: Whatever the specific beliefs about epilepsy, implications for felt and enacted stigma show considerable commonality worldwide. Although some studies show improvement in attitudes toward those living with epilepsy over time, much work remains to be done to improve attitudes and understand the true occurrence of discrimination against persons with epilepsy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)573-597
Number of pages25
JournalEpilepsia
Volume63
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2022

Keywords

  • enacted stigma
  • epilepsy terminology
  • felt stigma
  • negative attitudes
  • negative stereotypes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic review of frequency of felt and enacted stigma in epilepsy and determining factors and attitudes toward persons living with epilepsy—Report from the International League Against Epilepsy Task Force on Stigma in Epilepsy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this