Survivor-defined practice in domestic violence work: Measure development and preliminary evidence of link to empowerment

Lisa A. Goodman, Kristie Thomas, Lauren Bennett Cattaneo, Deborah Heimel, Julie M. Woulfe, Siu Kwan Chong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Survivor-defined practice, characterized by an emphasis on client choice, partnership, and sensitivity to the unique needs, contexts, and coping strategies of individual survivors, is an aspirational goal of the domestic violence (DV) movement, assumed to be a key contributor to empowerment and other positive outcomes among survivors. Despite its central role in DV program philosophy, training, and practice, however, our ability to assess its presence and its presumed link to well-being has been hampered by the absence of a way to measure it from survivors’ perspectives. As part of a larger university–community collaboration, this study had two aims: (a) to develop a measure of survivor-defined practice from the perspective of participants, and (b) to assess its relationship to safety-related empowerment after controlling for other contributors to survivor well-being (e.g., financial stability and social support). Results supported the reliability and validity of the Survivor-Defined Practice Scale (SDPS), a nine-item measure that assesses participants’ perception of the degree to which their advocates help them achieve goals they set for themselves, facilitate a spirit of partnership, and show sensitivity to their individual needs and styles. The items combined to form one factor indicating that the three theoretical aspects of survivordefined practice may be different manifestations of one underlying construct. Results also support the hypothesized link between survivor-defined practice and safety-related empowerment. The SDPS offers DV programs a mechanism for process evaluation that is rigorous and rooted in the feminist empowerment philosophy that so many programs espouse.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)163-185
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Interpersonal Violence
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Domestic Violence
Survivors
Safety
Power (Psychology)
Financial Support
Aptitude
Reproducibility of Results
Social Support
Education

Keywords

  • Advocacy
  • Domestic violence
  • Evaluation
  • Intimate partner violence
  • Service delivery
  • Survivor-defined advocacy
  • Survivor-defined practice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Survivor-defined practice in domestic violence work : Measure development and preliminary evidence of link to empowerment. / Goodman, Lisa A.; Thomas, Kristie; Cattaneo, Lauren Bennett; Heimel, Deborah; Woulfe, Julie M.; Chong, Siu Kwan.

In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 163-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goodman, Lisa A. ; Thomas, Kristie ; Cattaneo, Lauren Bennett ; Heimel, Deborah ; Woulfe, Julie M. ; Chong, Siu Kwan. / Survivor-defined practice in domestic violence work : Measure development and preliminary evidence of link to empowerment. In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 163-185.
@article{39f4d1e4337f4785bfaf32478a07fbd4,
title = "Survivor-defined practice in domestic violence work: Measure development and preliminary evidence of link to empowerment",
abstract = "Survivor-defined practice, characterized by an emphasis on client choice, partnership, and sensitivity to the unique needs, contexts, and coping strategies of individual survivors, is an aspirational goal of the domestic violence (DV) movement, assumed to be a key contributor to empowerment and other positive outcomes among survivors. Despite its central role in DV program philosophy, training, and practice, however, our ability to assess its presence and its presumed link to well-being has been hampered by the absence of a way to measure it from survivors’ perspectives. As part of a larger university–community collaboration, this study had two aims: (a) to develop a measure of survivor-defined practice from the perspective of participants, and (b) to assess its relationship to safety-related empowerment after controlling for other contributors to survivor well-being (e.g., financial stability and social support). Results supported the reliability and validity of the Survivor-Defined Practice Scale (SDPS), a nine-item measure that assesses participants’ perception of the degree to which their advocates help them achieve goals they set for themselves, facilitate a spirit of partnership, and show sensitivity to their individual needs and styles. The items combined to form one factor indicating that the three theoretical aspects of survivordefined practice may be different manifestations of one underlying construct. Results also support the hypothesized link between survivor-defined practice and safety-related empowerment. The SDPS offers DV programs a mechanism for process evaluation that is rigorous and rooted in the feminist empowerment philosophy that so many programs espouse.",
keywords = "Advocacy, Domestic violence, Evaluation, Intimate partner violence, Service delivery, Survivor-defined advocacy, Survivor-defined practice",
author = "Goodman, {Lisa A.} and Kristie Thomas and Cattaneo, {Lauren Bennett} and Deborah Heimel and Woulfe, {Julie M.} and Chong, {Siu Kwan}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0886260514555131",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "163--185",
journal = "Journal of Interpersonal Violence",
issn = "0886-2605",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Survivor-defined practice in domestic violence work

T2 - Measure development and preliminary evidence of link to empowerment

AU - Goodman, Lisa A.

AU - Thomas, Kristie

AU - Cattaneo, Lauren Bennett

AU - Heimel, Deborah

AU - Woulfe, Julie M.

AU - Chong, Siu Kwan

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Survivor-defined practice, characterized by an emphasis on client choice, partnership, and sensitivity to the unique needs, contexts, and coping strategies of individual survivors, is an aspirational goal of the domestic violence (DV) movement, assumed to be a key contributor to empowerment and other positive outcomes among survivors. Despite its central role in DV program philosophy, training, and practice, however, our ability to assess its presence and its presumed link to well-being has been hampered by the absence of a way to measure it from survivors’ perspectives. As part of a larger university–community collaboration, this study had two aims: (a) to develop a measure of survivor-defined practice from the perspective of participants, and (b) to assess its relationship to safety-related empowerment after controlling for other contributors to survivor well-being (e.g., financial stability and social support). Results supported the reliability and validity of the Survivor-Defined Practice Scale (SDPS), a nine-item measure that assesses participants’ perception of the degree to which their advocates help them achieve goals they set for themselves, facilitate a spirit of partnership, and show sensitivity to their individual needs and styles. The items combined to form one factor indicating that the three theoretical aspects of survivordefined practice may be different manifestations of one underlying construct. Results also support the hypothesized link between survivor-defined practice and safety-related empowerment. The SDPS offers DV programs a mechanism for process evaluation that is rigorous and rooted in the feminist empowerment philosophy that so many programs espouse.

AB - Survivor-defined practice, characterized by an emphasis on client choice, partnership, and sensitivity to the unique needs, contexts, and coping strategies of individual survivors, is an aspirational goal of the domestic violence (DV) movement, assumed to be a key contributor to empowerment and other positive outcomes among survivors. Despite its central role in DV program philosophy, training, and practice, however, our ability to assess its presence and its presumed link to well-being has been hampered by the absence of a way to measure it from survivors’ perspectives. As part of a larger university–community collaboration, this study had two aims: (a) to develop a measure of survivor-defined practice from the perspective of participants, and (b) to assess its relationship to safety-related empowerment after controlling for other contributors to survivor well-being (e.g., financial stability and social support). Results supported the reliability and validity of the Survivor-Defined Practice Scale (SDPS), a nine-item measure that assesses participants’ perception of the degree to which their advocates help them achieve goals they set for themselves, facilitate a spirit of partnership, and show sensitivity to their individual needs and styles. The items combined to form one factor indicating that the three theoretical aspects of survivordefined practice may be different manifestations of one underlying construct. Results also support the hypothesized link between survivor-defined practice and safety-related empowerment. The SDPS offers DV programs a mechanism for process evaluation that is rigorous and rooted in the feminist empowerment philosophy that so many programs espouse.

KW - Advocacy

KW - Domestic violence

KW - Evaluation

KW - Intimate partner violence

KW - Service delivery

KW - Survivor-defined advocacy

KW - Survivor-defined practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960347081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960347081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0886260514555131

DO - 10.1177/0886260514555131

M3 - Article

C2 - 25381271

AN - SCOPUS:84960347081

VL - 31

SP - 163

EP - 185

JO - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

JF - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

SN - 0886-2605

IS - 1

ER -