Surgeon perception is not a good predictor of peri-operative outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Joshua M. Stern, Saurabh Sharma, Pierre Mendoza, Mary Walicki, Rachel Hastings, Kelly Monahan, Baber Sheikh, Alexei Wedmid, David I. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Surgeons have always used their cognitive intuition for the execution of skilled tasks and real-time perception of intra-operative outcomes. We attempted to measure the overall accuracy of intra-operative surgeon perception on the functional outcome of early continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). A single experienced surgeon (D. I. L.) used a scoring sheet to prospectively capture his subjective opinion of how well a particular portion of the RARP procedure was completed. Surgeon perception of factors affecting post-operative continence such as quality of bladder neck preservation, nerve sparing, urethral length, anastomosis, striated sphincter thickness, quality of Rocco repair and bladder neck plication suture (total 7 variables) were graded as "poor", "average" or "good". Urinary continence was graded as either total continence [0 pads per day (PPD) or social continence (security pad or one PPD)]. A total of 273 (39 patients × 7 variables) responses were recorded: 58.6% were rated as "good", 32.2% as "average" and 8.4% as "poor". A log-rank test for all perception variables showed no significant differences in subsequent achievement of continence (either 0 or 1 PPD) (P > 0.05) at both the 1- and 3-month time points. In the case of some perception variables, patients with "bad" scores gained continence a median of 3 weeks sooner than patients with "good" scores. Surgeon perception of intra-operative performance during RARP is a poor predictive indicator of subsequent functional outcome in terms of urinary continence. Inter-surgeon variability of perception may vary and needs further investigation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-288
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Robotic Surgery
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Urinary Bladder
Time Perception
Intuition
Social Security
Sutures
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Prostate cancer
  • Radical prostatectomy
  • Robotic prostatectomy
  • Robotic surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Surgeon perception is not a good predictor of peri-operative outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. / Stern, Joshua M.; Sharma, Saurabh; Mendoza, Pierre; Walicki, Mary; Hastings, Rachel; Monahan, Kelly; Sheikh, Baber; Wedmid, Alexei; Lee, David I.

In: Journal of Robotic Surgery, Vol. 5, No. 4, 12.2011, p. 283-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stern, JM, Sharma, S, Mendoza, P, Walicki, M, Hastings, R, Monahan, K, Sheikh, B, Wedmid, A & Lee, DI 2011, 'Surgeon perception is not a good predictor of peri-operative outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy', Journal of Robotic Surgery, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 283-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0293-4
Stern, Joshua M. ; Sharma, Saurabh ; Mendoza, Pierre ; Walicki, Mary ; Hastings, Rachel ; Monahan, Kelly ; Sheikh, Baber ; Wedmid, Alexei ; Lee, David I. / Surgeon perception is not a good predictor of peri-operative outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. In: Journal of Robotic Surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 5, No. 4. pp. 283-288.
@article{66b9eae1bf144af092d125608ece8e60,
title = "Surgeon perception is not a good predictor of peri-operative outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy",
abstract = "Surgeons have always used their cognitive intuition for the execution of skilled tasks and real-time perception of intra-operative outcomes. We attempted to measure the overall accuracy of intra-operative surgeon perception on the functional outcome of early continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). A single experienced surgeon (D. I. L.) used a scoring sheet to prospectively capture his subjective opinion of how well a particular portion of the RARP procedure was completed. Surgeon perception of factors affecting post-operative continence such as quality of bladder neck preservation, nerve sparing, urethral length, anastomosis, striated sphincter thickness, quality of Rocco repair and bladder neck plication suture (total 7 variables) were graded as {"}poor{"}, {"}average{"} or {"}good{"}. Urinary continence was graded as either total continence [0 pads per day (PPD) or social continence (security pad or one PPD)]. A total of 273 (39 patients × 7 variables) responses were recorded: 58.6{\%} were rated as {"}good{"}, 32.2{\%} as {"}average{"} and 8.4{\%} as {"}poor{"}. A log-rank test for all perception variables showed no significant differences in subsequent achievement of continence (either 0 or 1 PPD) (P > 0.05) at both the 1- and 3-month time points. In the case of some perception variables, patients with {"}bad{"} scores gained continence a median of 3 weeks sooner than patients with {"}good{"} scores. Surgeon perception of intra-operative performance during RARP is a poor predictive indicator of subsequent functional outcome in terms of urinary continence. Inter-surgeon variability of perception may vary and needs further investigation.",
keywords = "Prostate cancer, Radical prostatectomy, Robotic prostatectomy, Robotic surgery",
author = "Stern, {Joshua M.} and Saurabh Sharma and Pierre Mendoza and Mary Walicki and Rachel Hastings and Kelly Monahan and Baber Sheikh and Alexei Wedmid and Lee, {David I.}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s11701-011-0293-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "283--288",
journal = "Journal of Robotic Surgery",
issn = "1863-2483",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgeon perception is not a good predictor of peri-operative outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

AU - Stern, Joshua M.

AU - Sharma, Saurabh

AU - Mendoza, Pierre

AU - Walicki, Mary

AU - Hastings, Rachel

AU - Monahan, Kelly

AU - Sheikh, Baber

AU - Wedmid, Alexei

AU - Lee, David I.

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - Surgeons have always used their cognitive intuition for the execution of skilled tasks and real-time perception of intra-operative outcomes. We attempted to measure the overall accuracy of intra-operative surgeon perception on the functional outcome of early continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). A single experienced surgeon (D. I. L.) used a scoring sheet to prospectively capture his subjective opinion of how well a particular portion of the RARP procedure was completed. Surgeon perception of factors affecting post-operative continence such as quality of bladder neck preservation, nerve sparing, urethral length, anastomosis, striated sphincter thickness, quality of Rocco repair and bladder neck plication suture (total 7 variables) were graded as "poor", "average" or "good". Urinary continence was graded as either total continence [0 pads per day (PPD) or social continence (security pad or one PPD)]. A total of 273 (39 patients × 7 variables) responses were recorded: 58.6% were rated as "good", 32.2% as "average" and 8.4% as "poor". A log-rank test for all perception variables showed no significant differences in subsequent achievement of continence (either 0 or 1 PPD) (P > 0.05) at both the 1- and 3-month time points. In the case of some perception variables, patients with "bad" scores gained continence a median of 3 weeks sooner than patients with "good" scores. Surgeon perception of intra-operative performance during RARP is a poor predictive indicator of subsequent functional outcome in terms of urinary continence. Inter-surgeon variability of perception may vary and needs further investigation.

AB - Surgeons have always used their cognitive intuition for the execution of skilled tasks and real-time perception of intra-operative outcomes. We attempted to measure the overall accuracy of intra-operative surgeon perception on the functional outcome of early continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). A single experienced surgeon (D. I. L.) used a scoring sheet to prospectively capture his subjective opinion of how well a particular portion of the RARP procedure was completed. Surgeon perception of factors affecting post-operative continence such as quality of bladder neck preservation, nerve sparing, urethral length, anastomosis, striated sphincter thickness, quality of Rocco repair and bladder neck plication suture (total 7 variables) were graded as "poor", "average" or "good". Urinary continence was graded as either total continence [0 pads per day (PPD) or social continence (security pad or one PPD)]. A total of 273 (39 patients × 7 variables) responses were recorded: 58.6% were rated as "good", 32.2% as "average" and 8.4% as "poor". A log-rank test for all perception variables showed no significant differences in subsequent achievement of continence (either 0 or 1 PPD) (P > 0.05) at both the 1- and 3-month time points. In the case of some perception variables, patients with "bad" scores gained continence a median of 3 weeks sooner than patients with "good" scores. Surgeon perception of intra-operative performance during RARP is a poor predictive indicator of subsequent functional outcome in terms of urinary continence. Inter-surgeon variability of perception may vary and needs further investigation.

KW - Prostate cancer

KW - Radical prostatectomy

KW - Robotic prostatectomy

KW - Robotic surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80855148188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80855148188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11701-011-0293-4

DO - 10.1007/s11701-011-0293-4

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 283

EP - 288

JO - Journal of Robotic Surgery

JF - Journal of Robotic Surgery

SN - 1863-2483

IS - 4

ER -