Supervision of the initial interview. A study of two methods

S. P. Stein, T. B. Karasu, E. S. Charles, P. J. Buckley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two methods of supervision of the initial evaluation of outpatients by psychiatric residents were compared. In condition 1, residents evaluated patients and then presented the case material to a supervisor in the traditional manner. In condition 2, the supervisor observed the interview directly. Supervisor and residents then independently completed ratings of psychopathology, motivation, insight, and prognosis of the patients. Significant differences in several variables between the two conditions were noted. Resident and supervisor ratings of patients were in clear agreement when both observed the interview.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)265-268
Number of pages4
JournalArchives of General Psychiatry
Volume32
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1975

Fingerprint

Interviews
Psychopathology
Psychiatry
Motivation
Outpatients

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Stein, S. P., Karasu, T. B., Charles, E. S., & Buckley, P. J. (1975). Supervision of the initial interview. A study of two methods. Archives of General Psychiatry, 32(2), 265-268.

Supervision of the initial interview. A study of two methods. / Stein, S. P.; Karasu, T. B.; Charles, E. S.; Buckley, P. J.

In: Archives of General Psychiatry, Vol. 32, No. 2, 1975, p. 265-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stein, SP, Karasu, TB, Charles, ES & Buckley, PJ 1975, 'Supervision of the initial interview. A study of two methods', Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 265-268.
Stein SP, Karasu TB, Charles ES, Buckley PJ. Supervision of the initial interview. A study of two methods. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1975;32(2):265-268.
Stein, S. P. ; Karasu, T. B. ; Charles, E. S. ; Buckley, P. J. / Supervision of the initial interview. A study of two methods. In: Archives of General Psychiatry. 1975 ; Vol. 32, No. 2. pp. 265-268.
@article{ca0f9cda24184bfbb015997753f80417,
title = "Supervision of the initial interview. A study of two methods",
abstract = "Two methods of supervision of the initial evaluation of outpatients by psychiatric residents were compared. In condition 1, residents evaluated patients and then presented the case material to a supervisor in the traditional manner. In condition 2, the supervisor observed the interview directly. Supervisor and residents then independently completed ratings of psychopathology, motivation, insight, and prognosis of the patients. Significant differences in several variables between the two conditions were noted. Resident and supervisor ratings of patients were in clear agreement when both observed the interview.",
author = "Stein, {S. P.} and Karasu, {T. B.} and Charles, {E. S.} and Buckley, {P. J.}",
year = "1975",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "265--268",
journal = "JAMA Psychiatry",
issn = "2168-622X",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supervision of the initial interview. A study of two methods

AU - Stein, S. P.

AU - Karasu, T. B.

AU - Charles, E. S.

AU - Buckley, P. J.

PY - 1975

Y1 - 1975

N2 - Two methods of supervision of the initial evaluation of outpatients by psychiatric residents were compared. In condition 1, residents evaluated patients and then presented the case material to a supervisor in the traditional manner. In condition 2, the supervisor observed the interview directly. Supervisor and residents then independently completed ratings of psychopathology, motivation, insight, and prognosis of the patients. Significant differences in several variables between the two conditions were noted. Resident and supervisor ratings of patients were in clear agreement when both observed the interview.

AB - Two methods of supervision of the initial evaluation of outpatients by psychiatric residents were compared. In condition 1, residents evaluated patients and then presented the case material to a supervisor in the traditional manner. In condition 2, the supervisor observed the interview directly. Supervisor and residents then independently completed ratings of psychopathology, motivation, insight, and prognosis of the patients. Significant differences in several variables between the two conditions were noted. Resident and supervisor ratings of patients were in clear agreement when both observed the interview.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0016790787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0016790787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 265

EP - 268

JO - JAMA Psychiatry

JF - JAMA Psychiatry

SN - 2168-622X

IS - 2

ER -