SU‐GG‐J‐73: Dose Distribution Improvements for Prostate Cancer Patients Using Hybrid Image Guidance Systems

Y. Rong, R. Tolakanahalli, Wolfgang A. Tome, B. Paliwal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Daily setup variations may compromise the precision of dose delivery, tumor control and normal tissue avoidance. This study analyzed the setup variations predicted by kilo‐voltage Cone Beam CT (CBCT) combined with 3D Ultrasound image guidance. The overall integrity of prostate dose distribution was considered to define an offset threshold above which image guidance becomes crucial for dose delivery. Method and Materials: Initial immobilization was performed using three‐point in‐room lasers. The residual positional errors were assessed using CBCT from Varian Trilogy™ and Ultrasound guidance by Sonarray™ system. Superposition of offset vectors on the initial prostate plans enabled detailed evaluation of resultant changes in dosimetric and biological aspects for target and organs at risk. On‐line CBCT images were used for calculation. Dose volume histograms (DVH), Gamma Index (GI), equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and tumor control probability (TCP) were calculated. Other indices such as mean total dose (mTd) and maximal total dose (MTD) for normal structures were also considered in defining the threshold. Results and Conclusion: After initial laser alignment, the mean vector of residual displacements over all prostate patients is 6.2mm with a 5.0mm standard deviation. The decrease in EUD for defined tumor volumes was up to 66% when the largest offset was applied and 10% in the composite plan which incorporated overall offset histories. Results show that if patient's offsets were smaller than the applied PTV margin (5mm), unappreciable changes in dose coverage and tumor control were revealed. However, if offsets were larger than the PTV margin, tumor control and normal tissue sparing can be significantly compromised if proper couch shifts are not made under the imaging guidance system. In this situation, special attention is needed especially on organs at risk and even the adaptive radiotherapy might be necessary.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2695-2696
Number of pages2
JournalMedical Physics
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostatic Neoplasms
Organs at Risk
Prostate
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Neoplasms
Lasers
Tumor Burden
Immobilization
Radiotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐GG‐J‐73 : Dose Distribution Improvements for Prostate Cancer Patients Using Hybrid Image Guidance Systems. / Rong, Y.; Tolakanahalli, R.; Tome, Wolfgang A.; Paliwal, B.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2008, p. 2695-2696.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9b5d846caf2f4a61a96608f1e99865a2,
title = "SU‐GG‐J‐73: Dose Distribution Improvements for Prostate Cancer Patients Using Hybrid Image Guidance Systems",
abstract = "Purpose: Daily setup variations may compromise the precision of dose delivery, tumor control and normal tissue avoidance. This study analyzed the setup variations predicted by kilo‐voltage Cone Beam CT (CBCT) combined with 3D Ultrasound image guidance. The overall integrity of prostate dose distribution was considered to define an offset threshold above which image guidance becomes crucial for dose delivery. Method and Materials: Initial immobilization was performed using three‐point in‐room lasers. The residual positional errors were assessed using CBCT from Varian Trilogy™ and Ultrasound guidance by Sonarray™ system. Superposition of offset vectors on the initial prostate plans enabled detailed evaluation of resultant changes in dosimetric and biological aspects for target and organs at risk. On‐line CBCT images were used for calculation. Dose volume histograms (DVH), Gamma Index (GI), equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and tumor control probability (TCP) were calculated. Other indices such as mean total dose (mTd) and maximal total dose (MTD) for normal structures were also considered in defining the threshold. Results and Conclusion: After initial laser alignment, the mean vector of residual displacements over all prostate patients is 6.2mm with a 5.0mm standard deviation. The decrease in EUD for defined tumor volumes was up to 66{\%} when the largest offset was applied and 10{\%} in the composite plan which incorporated overall offset histories. Results show that if patient's offsets were smaller than the applied PTV margin (5mm), unappreciable changes in dose coverage and tumor control were revealed. However, if offsets were larger than the PTV margin, tumor control and normal tissue sparing can be significantly compromised if proper couch shifts are not made under the imaging guidance system. In this situation, special attention is needed especially on organs at risk and even the adaptive radiotherapy might be necessary.",
author = "Y. Rong and R. Tolakanahalli and Tome, {Wolfgang A.} and B. Paliwal",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1118/1.2961623",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "2695--2696",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐GG‐J‐73

T2 - Dose Distribution Improvements for Prostate Cancer Patients Using Hybrid Image Guidance Systems

AU - Rong, Y.

AU - Tolakanahalli, R.

AU - Tome, Wolfgang A.

AU - Paliwal, B.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Purpose: Daily setup variations may compromise the precision of dose delivery, tumor control and normal tissue avoidance. This study analyzed the setup variations predicted by kilo‐voltage Cone Beam CT (CBCT) combined with 3D Ultrasound image guidance. The overall integrity of prostate dose distribution was considered to define an offset threshold above which image guidance becomes crucial for dose delivery. Method and Materials: Initial immobilization was performed using three‐point in‐room lasers. The residual positional errors were assessed using CBCT from Varian Trilogy™ and Ultrasound guidance by Sonarray™ system. Superposition of offset vectors on the initial prostate plans enabled detailed evaluation of resultant changes in dosimetric and biological aspects for target and organs at risk. On‐line CBCT images were used for calculation. Dose volume histograms (DVH), Gamma Index (GI), equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and tumor control probability (TCP) were calculated. Other indices such as mean total dose (mTd) and maximal total dose (MTD) for normal structures were also considered in defining the threshold. Results and Conclusion: After initial laser alignment, the mean vector of residual displacements over all prostate patients is 6.2mm with a 5.0mm standard deviation. The decrease in EUD for defined tumor volumes was up to 66% when the largest offset was applied and 10% in the composite plan which incorporated overall offset histories. Results show that if patient's offsets were smaller than the applied PTV margin (5mm), unappreciable changes in dose coverage and tumor control were revealed. However, if offsets were larger than the PTV margin, tumor control and normal tissue sparing can be significantly compromised if proper couch shifts are not made under the imaging guidance system. In this situation, special attention is needed especially on organs at risk and even the adaptive radiotherapy might be necessary.

AB - Purpose: Daily setup variations may compromise the precision of dose delivery, tumor control and normal tissue avoidance. This study analyzed the setup variations predicted by kilo‐voltage Cone Beam CT (CBCT) combined with 3D Ultrasound image guidance. The overall integrity of prostate dose distribution was considered to define an offset threshold above which image guidance becomes crucial for dose delivery. Method and Materials: Initial immobilization was performed using three‐point in‐room lasers. The residual positional errors were assessed using CBCT from Varian Trilogy™ and Ultrasound guidance by Sonarray™ system. Superposition of offset vectors on the initial prostate plans enabled detailed evaluation of resultant changes in dosimetric and biological aspects for target and organs at risk. On‐line CBCT images were used for calculation. Dose volume histograms (DVH), Gamma Index (GI), equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and tumor control probability (TCP) were calculated. Other indices such as mean total dose (mTd) and maximal total dose (MTD) for normal structures were also considered in defining the threshold. Results and Conclusion: After initial laser alignment, the mean vector of residual displacements over all prostate patients is 6.2mm with a 5.0mm standard deviation. The decrease in EUD for defined tumor volumes was up to 66% when the largest offset was applied and 10% in the composite plan which incorporated overall offset histories. Results show that if patient's offsets were smaller than the applied PTV margin (5mm), unappreciable changes in dose coverage and tumor control were revealed. However, if offsets were larger than the PTV margin, tumor control and normal tissue sparing can be significantly compromised if proper couch shifts are not made under the imaging guidance system. In this situation, special attention is needed especially on organs at risk and even the adaptive radiotherapy might be necessary.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024775038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024775038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2961623

DO - 10.1118/1.2961623

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024775038

VL - 35

SP - 2695

EP - 2696

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -