SU‐FF‐T‐112: Dose Sparing of Brainstem and Spinal Cord for Re‐Irradiating Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy

C. Lee, C. Chen, D. Mah, R. Sharma, E. Landau, Madhur K. Garg, A. wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Due to the lifetime dose limit for these critical structures such as brainstem and spinal cord, achieving an additional dose of 60 Gy to patients with recurrent head and neck cancer is challenging for who received a previous dose of ∼60 Gy. Specifically, previously irradiated head and neck patients may be near tolerance dose to their brainstem and spinal cord. In this study, a reproducible IMRT treatment design is presented to spare the doses to brainstem and spinal cord with no compromise of prescribed dose delivery. Method and Materials: Seven patients with previously irradiated, recurrent head‐and‐neck cancers were treated with DMLC IMRT. The jaws of each field were set fixed with the goal of shielding the brainstem and spinal cord at the sacrifice of partial coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) from any particular beam orientation. Beam geometry was arranged to have sufficient coverage of the PTV and ensure that the constraints of spinal cord <10 Gy and brainstem < 15 Gy were met. Results: The mean maximum dose to the brainstem was 12.1 Gy (range: 6.1–17.3 Gy), and the mean maximum dose to spinal cord was 10.4 Gy (range: 8.2–14.1 Gy). For most cases, 97% of the PTV volume was fully covered by the 95% isodose volume. We found empirically that if the angle of cervical spine curvature (Cobb's angle) was less than ∼30 degrees, patients could be treated by 18 fields. Six patients met these criteria and were treated in 25 minutes per fraction. One patient exceeded a 30 degree Cobb's angle and was treated by 31 fields in 45 minutes per fraction. Conclusion: We have demonstrated a new technique for re‐treatment of head and neck cancers. The angle of cervical spine curvature plays an important role in the efficiency and effectiveness of our approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2545
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Brain Stem
Spinal Cord
Spine
Retreatment
Jaw
Neck
Head
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐FF‐T‐112 : Dose Sparing of Brainstem and Spinal Cord for Re‐Irradiating Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy. / Lee, C.; Chen, C.; Mah, D.; Sharma, R.; Landau, E.; Garg, Madhur K.; wu, A.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2009, p. 2545.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3dfe8ea0126347b6b2d0a06ea03fc1e9,
title = "SU‐FF‐T‐112: Dose Sparing of Brainstem and Spinal Cord for Re‐Irradiating Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy",
abstract = "Purpose: Due to the lifetime dose limit for these critical structures such as brainstem and spinal cord, achieving an additional dose of 60 Gy to patients with recurrent head and neck cancer is challenging for who received a previous dose of ∼60 Gy. Specifically, previously irradiated head and neck patients may be near tolerance dose to their brainstem and spinal cord. In this study, a reproducible IMRT treatment design is presented to spare the doses to brainstem and spinal cord with no compromise of prescribed dose delivery. Method and Materials: Seven patients with previously irradiated, recurrent head‐and‐neck cancers were treated with DMLC IMRT. The jaws of each field were set fixed with the goal of shielding the brainstem and spinal cord at the sacrifice of partial coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) from any particular beam orientation. Beam geometry was arranged to have sufficient coverage of the PTV and ensure that the constraints of spinal cord <10 Gy and brainstem < 15 Gy were met. Results: The mean maximum dose to the brainstem was 12.1 Gy (range: 6.1–17.3 Gy), and the mean maximum dose to spinal cord was 10.4 Gy (range: 8.2–14.1 Gy). For most cases, 97{\%} of the PTV volume was fully covered by the 95{\%} isodose volume. We found empirically that if the angle of cervical spine curvature (Cobb's angle) was less than ∼30 degrees, patients could be treated by 18 fields. Six patients met these criteria and were treated in 25 minutes per fraction. One patient exceeded a 30 degree Cobb's angle and was treated by 31 fields in 45 minutes per fraction. Conclusion: We have demonstrated a new technique for re‐treatment of head and neck cancers. The angle of cervical spine curvature plays an important role in the efficiency and effectiveness of our approach.",
author = "C. Lee and C. Chen and D. Mah and R. Sharma and E. Landau and Garg, {Madhur K.} and A. wu",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1118/1.3181586",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "2545",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐FF‐T‐112

T2 - Dose Sparing of Brainstem and Spinal Cord for Re‐Irradiating Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy

AU - Lee, C.

AU - Chen, C.

AU - Mah, D.

AU - Sharma, R.

AU - Landau, E.

AU - Garg, Madhur K.

AU - wu, A.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Purpose: Due to the lifetime dose limit for these critical structures such as brainstem and spinal cord, achieving an additional dose of 60 Gy to patients with recurrent head and neck cancer is challenging for who received a previous dose of ∼60 Gy. Specifically, previously irradiated head and neck patients may be near tolerance dose to their brainstem and spinal cord. In this study, a reproducible IMRT treatment design is presented to spare the doses to brainstem and spinal cord with no compromise of prescribed dose delivery. Method and Materials: Seven patients with previously irradiated, recurrent head‐and‐neck cancers were treated with DMLC IMRT. The jaws of each field were set fixed with the goal of shielding the brainstem and spinal cord at the sacrifice of partial coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) from any particular beam orientation. Beam geometry was arranged to have sufficient coverage of the PTV and ensure that the constraints of spinal cord <10 Gy and brainstem < 15 Gy were met. Results: The mean maximum dose to the brainstem was 12.1 Gy (range: 6.1–17.3 Gy), and the mean maximum dose to spinal cord was 10.4 Gy (range: 8.2–14.1 Gy). For most cases, 97% of the PTV volume was fully covered by the 95% isodose volume. We found empirically that if the angle of cervical spine curvature (Cobb's angle) was less than ∼30 degrees, patients could be treated by 18 fields. Six patients met these criteria and were treated in 25 minutes per fraction. One patient exceeded a 30 degree Cobb's angle and was treated by 31 fields in 45 minutes per fraction. Conclusion: We have demonstrated a new technique for re‐treatment of head and neck cancers. The angle of cervical spine curvature plays an important role in the efficiency and effectiveness of our approach.

AB - Purpose: Due to the lifetime dose limit for these critical structures such as brainstem and spinal cord, achieving an additional dose of 60 Gy to patients with recurrent head and neck cancer is challenging for who received a previous dose of ∼60 Gy. Specifically, previously irradiated head and neck patients may be near tolerance dose to their brainstem and spinal cord. In this study, a reproducible IMRT treatment design is presented to spare the doses to brainstem and spinal cord with no compromise of prescribed dose delivery. Method and Materials: Seven patients with previously irradiated, recurrent head‐and‐neck cancers were treated with DMLC IMRT. The jaws of each field were set fixed with the goal of shielding the brainstem and spinal cord at the sacrifice of partial coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) from any particular beam orientation. Beam geometry was arranged to have sufficient coverage of the PTV and ensure that the constraints of spinal cord <10 Gy and brainstem < 15 Gy were met. Results: The mean maximum dose to the brainstem was 12.1 Gy (range: 6.1–17.3 Gy), and the mean maximum dose to spinal cord was 10.4 Gy (range: 8.2–14.1 Gy). For most cases, 97% of the PTV volume was fully covered by the 95% isodose volume. We found empirically that if the angle of cervical spine curvature (Cobb's angle) was less than ∼30 degrees, patients could be treated by 18 fields. Six patients met these criteria and were treated in 25 minutes per fraction. One patient exceeded a 30 degree Cobb's angle and was treated by 31 fields in 45 minutes per fraction. Conclusion: We have demonstrated a new technique for re‐treatment of head and neck cancers. The angle of cervical spine curvature plays an important role in the efficiency and effectiveness of our approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024791723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024791723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3181586

DO - 10.1118/1.3181586

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024791723

VL - 36

SP - 2545

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -