SU‐E‐J‐40

A Study of Voxel‐by‐Voxel Accumulated Dose for Prostate Cancer Using Deformable Registrationv

J. yu, N. Hardcastle, M. Ritter, Wolfgang A. Tome

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores the methodology of determining accumulated delivered dose using deformable registration. The aim of the study was to examine the inter‐fraction variation of dose delivered to the patient and to compare the voxel‐by‐voxel accumulated dose with the planned dose. Methods: Five prostate patients treated with a rectal balloon using the same 12‐fraction Hi‐Art Tomotherapy technique were studied. The dose was calculated on the pre‐treatment MVCT images of each fraction. All 12 dose grids were then accumulated on the 12th fraction MVCT using adaptive tools in the Pinnacle treatment planning system (v9.100). The rectal wall and prostate were outlined on each fraction's pre‐treatment MVCT for each patient to study the inter‐fraction dose variation. Results: The absolute volume rectal wall DVHs for each fraction vary from fraction to fraction with rectal balloon volume, but the overall shape of the DVH curves is preserved. The accumulated absolute volume DVH shows a discrepancy from the planned DVH depending on how well the rectal wall volume on the 12th fraction MVCT agrees with that on the planned image. The planned and accumulated normalized DVH (normDVH) for prostate agreed well. For one patient, the normDVH for rectal wall was greater than the planned normDVH in high dose range, which was attributable to a large over‐inflation of the rectal balloon for a single fraction. For another patient, the balloon volume as measured on the KVCT was much greater than that on the MVCTs. This caused the accumulated rectal wall normDVH in the high dose region to be lower than planned. For the prostate, the planned doses and the accumulated doses agreed well for the normalized DVHs. Conclusions: Demonstrating the utility of deformable registration methodology, these results show that consistency of delivered rectal wall doses is dependent on the consistency of the rectal balloon volume. N Hardcastle is funded by Philips Healthcare.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3450-3451
Number of pages2
JournalMedical Physics
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostatic Neoplasms
Prostate
Delivery of Health Care
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐E‐J‐40 : A Study of Voxel‐by‐Voxel Accumulated Dose for Prostate Cancer Using Deformable Registrationv. / yu, J.; Hardcastle, N.; Ritter, M.; Tome, Wolfgang A.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2011, p. 3450-3451.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b8f0e689254c4228860ab3b9936c0077,
title = "SU‐E‐J‐40: A Study of Voxel‐by‐Voxel Accumulated Dose for Prostate Cancer Using Deformable Registrationv",
abstract = "Purpose: This study explores the methodology of determining accumulated delivered dose using deformable registration. The aim of the study was to examine the inter‐fraction variation of dose delivered to the patient and to compare the voxel‐by‐voxel accumulated dose with the planned dose. Methods: Five prostate patients treated with a rectal balloon using the same 12‐fraction Hi‐Art Tomotherapy technique were studied. The dose was calculated on the pre‐treatment MVCT images of each fraction. All 12 dose grids were then accumulated on the 12th fraction MVCT using adaptive tools in the Pinnacle treatment planning system (v9.100). The rectal wall and prostate were outlined on each fraction's pre‐treatment MVCT for each patient to study the inter‐fraction dose variation. Results: The absolute volume rectal wall DVHs for each fraction vary from fraction to fraction with rectal balloon volume, but the overall shape of the DVH curves is preserved. The accumulated absolute volume DVH shows a discrepancy from the planned DVH depending on how well the rectal wall volume on the 12th fraction MVCT agrees with that on the planned image. The planned and accumulated normalized DVH (normDVH) for prostate agreed well. For one patient, the normDVH for rectal wall was greater than the planned normDVH in high dose range, which was attributable to a large over‐inflation of the rectal balloon for a single fraction. For another patient, the balloon volume as measured on the KVCT was much greater than that on the MVCTs. This caused the accumulated rectal wall normDVH in the high dose region to be lower than planned. For the prostate, the planned doses and the accumulated doses agreed well for the normalized DVHs. Conclusions: Demonstrating the utility of deformable registration methodology, these results show that consistency of delivered rectal wall doses is dependent on the consistency of the rectal balloon volume. N Hardcastle is funded by Philips Healthcare.",
author = "J. yu and N. Hardcastle and M. Ritter and Tome, {Wolfgang A.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1118/1.3611808",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "3450--3451",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐E‐J‐40

T2 - A Study of Voxel‐by‐Voxel Accumulated Dose for Prostate Cancer Using Deformable Registrationv

AU - yu, J.

AU - Hardcastle, N.

AU - Ritter, M.

AU - Tome, Wolfgang A.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Purpose: This study explores the methodology of determining accumulated delivered dose using deformable registration. The aim of the study was to examine the inter‐fraction variation of dose delivered to the patient and to compare the voxel‐by‐voxel accumulated dose with the planned dose. Methods: Five prostate patients treated with a rectal balloon using the same 12‐fraction Hi‐Art Tomotherapy technique were studied. The dose was calculated on the pre‐treatment MVCT images of each fraction. All 12 dose grids were then accumulated on the 12th fraction MVCT using adaptive tools in the Pinnacle treatment planning system (v9.100). The rectal wall and prostate were outlined on each fraction's pre‐treatment MVCT for each patient to study the inter‐fraction dose variation. Results: The absolute volume rectal wall DVHs for each fraction vary from fraction to fraction with rectal balloon volume, but the overall shape of the DVH curves is preserved. The accumulated absolute volume DVH shows a discrepancy from the planned DVH depending on how well the rectal wall volume on the 12th fraction MVCT agrees with that on the planned image. The planned and accumulated normalized DVH (normDVH) for prostate agreed well. For one patient, the normDVH for rectal wall was greater than the planned normDVH in high dose range, which was attributable to a large over‐inflation of the rectal balloon for a single fraction. For another patient, the balloon volume as measured on the KVCT was much greater than that on the MVCTs. This caused the accumulated rectal wall normDVH in the high dose region to be lower than planned. For the prostate, the planned doses and the accumulated doses agreed well for the normalized DVHs. Conclusions: Demonstrating the utility of deformable registration methodology, these results show that consistency of delivered rectal wall doses is dependent on the consistency of the rectal balloon volume. N Hardcastle is funded by Philips Healthcare.

AB - Purpose: This study explores the methodology of determining accumulated delivered dose using deformable registration. The aim of the study was to examine the inter‐fraction variation of dose delivered to the patient and to compare the voxel‐by‐voxel accumulated dose with the planned dose. Methods: Five prostate patients treated with a rectal balloon using the same 12‐fraction Hi‐Art Tomotherapy technique were studied. The dose was calculated on the pre‐treatment MVCT images of each fraction. All 12 dose grids were then accumulated on the 12th fraction MVCT using adaptive tools in the Pinnacle treatment planning system (v9.100). The rectal wall and prostate were outlined on each fraction's pre‐treatment MVCT for each patient to study the inter‐fraction dose variation. Results: The absolute volume rectal wall DVHs for each fraction vary from fraction to fraction with rectal balloon volume, but the overall shape of the DVH curves is preserved. The accumulated absolute volume DVH shows a discrepancy from the planned DVH depending on how well the rectal wall volume on the 12th fraction MVCT agrees with that on the planned image. The planned and accumulated normalized DVH (normDVH) for prostate agreed well. For one patient, the normDVH for rectal wall was greater than the planned normDVH in high dose range, which was attributable to a large over‐inflation of the rectal balloon for a single fraction. For another patient, the balloon volume as measured on the KVCT was much greater than that on the MVCTs. This caused the accumulated rectal wall normDVH in the high dose region to be lower than planned. For the prostate, the planned doses and the accumulated doses agreed well for the normalized DVHs. Conclusions: Demonstrating the utility of deformable registration methodology, these results show that consistency of delivered rectal wall doses is dependent on the consistency of the rectal balloon volume. N Hardcastle is funded by Philips Healthcare.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024806048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024806048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3611808

DO - 10.1118/1.3611808

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 3450

EP - 3451

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -