### Abstract

Purpose: Prediction methods for breathing patterns, which are crucial to deal with system latency in treatments of moving lung tumors using state‐space methodologies based on non‐linear dynamics are contrasted to linear predictive methods. Method and Materials: In our previous work we established that breathing patterns can be described as a 5‐6 dimensional nonlinear, stationary and deterministic system that exhibits sensitive dependence on initial conditions. In this work, nonlinear prediction methods are used to predict the short‐term evolution of the respiratory system for 3 patients. Single step and N‐point multi step prediction are performed for sampling rates of 5Hz, 10Hz, and 30Hz. We compare the employed nonlinear prediction methods with respect to prediction accuracy to Infinite Impulse Response (IIR) prediction filters. The simplest form of local prediction is finding similar segments of scalar time series data in a higher dimensional embedding space. Hence, we predict the future value x(t)of N‐time steps ahead by simply finding the average of nearest neighbor points to the point x(t) in the past and using them to estimate x(t+N), yielding a local average model (LAM). Local linear models (LLM) which are linear autoregressive models that hold only for a region around the target point formed by the nearest neighbor points is combined with a set of linear regularization techniques to solve ill‐posed regression problems are also implemented. Results: For all sampling frequencies, both single step and N‐point multi step prediction results obtained using LAM and LLM with regularization methods are better than IIR prediction filters for the selected sample patients. Conclusions: The use of non‐linear prediction methods for predicting the breathing pattern of lung cancer patients may lead to improved, robust and accurate long‐term prediction to account for system latencies.

Original language | English (US) |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 3686 |

Number of pages | 1 |

Journal | Medical Physics |

Volume | 39 |

Issue number | 6 |

DOIs | |

State | Published - 2012 |

Externally published | Yes |

### Fingerprint

### ASJC Scopus subject areas

- Biophysics
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

### Cite this

*Medical Physics*,

*39*(6), 3686. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4734982

**SU‐E‐J‐146 : Time Series Prediction of Lung Cancer Patients’ Breathing Pattern Based on Nonlinear Dynamics.** / Tolakanahalli, R.; Tewatia, D.; Tome, Wolfgang A.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

*Medical Physics*, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 3686. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4734982

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐E‐J‐146

T2 - Time Series Prediction of Lung Cancer Patients’ Breathing Pattern Based on Nonlinear Dynamics

AU - Tolakanahalli, R.

AU - Tewatia, D.

AU - Tome, Wolfgang A.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose: Prediction methods for breathing patterns, which are crucial to deal with system latency in treatments of moving lung tumors using state‐space methodologies based on non‐linear dynamics are contrasted to linear predictive methods. Method and Materials: In our previous work we established that breathing patterns can be described as a 5‐6 dimensional nonlinear, stationary and deterministic system that exhibits sensitive dependence on initial conditions. In this work, nonlinear prediction methods are used to predict the short‐term evolution of the respiratory system for 3 patients. Single step and N‐point multi step prediction are performed for sampling rates of 5Hz, 10Hz, and 30Hz. We compare the employed nonlinear prediction methods with respect to prediction accuracy to Infinite Impulse Response (IIR) prediction filters. The simplest form of local prediction is finding similar segments of scalar time series data in a higher dimensional embedding space. Hence, we predict the future value x(t)of N‐time steps ahead by simply finding the average of nearest neighbor points to the point x(t) in the past and using them to estimate x(t+N), yielding a local average model (LAM). Local linear models (LLM) which are linear autoregressive models that hold only for a region around the target point formed by the nearest neighbor points is combined with a set of linear regularization techniques to solve ill‐posed regression problems are also implemented. Results: For all sampling frequencies, both single step and N‐point multi step prediction results obtained using LAM and LLM with regularization methods are better than IIR prediction filters for the selected sample patients. Conclusions: The use of non‐linear prediction methods for predicting the breathing pattern of lung cancer patients may lead to improved, robust and accurate long‐term prediction to account for system latencies.

AB - Purpose: Prediction methods for breathing patterns, which are crucial to deal with system latency in treatments of moving lung tumors using state‐space methodologies based on non‐linear dynamics are contrasted to linear predictive methods. Method and Materials: In our previous work we established that breathing patterns can be described as a 5‐6 dimensional nonlinear, stationary and deterministic system that exhibits sensitive dependence on initial conditions. In this work, nonlinear prediction methods are used to predict the short‐term evolution of the respiratory system for 3 patients. Single step and N‐point multi step prediction are performed for sampling rates of 5Hz, 10Hz, and 30Hz. We compare the employed nonlinear prediction methods with respect to prediction accuracy to Infinite Impulse Response (IIR) prediction filters. The simplest form of local prediction is finding similar segments of scalar time series data in a higher dimensional embedding space. Hence, we predict the future value x(t)of N‐time steps ahead by simply finding the average of nearest neighbor points to the point x(t) in the past and using them to estimate x(t+N), yielding a local average model (LAM). Local linear models (LLM) which are linear autoregressive models that hold only for a region around the target point formed by the nearest neighbor points is combined with a set of linear regularization techniques to solve ill‐posed regression problems are also implemented. Results: For all sampling frequencies, both single step and N‐point multi step prediction results obtained using LAM and LLM with regularization methods are better than IIR prediction filters for the selected sample patients. Conclusions: The use of non‐linear prediction methods for predicting the breathing pattern of lung cancer patients may lead to improved, robust and accurate long‐term prediction to account for system latencies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024779873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024779873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.4734982

DO - 10.1118/1.4734982

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024779873

VL - 39

SP - 3686

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -