Storing empty calories and chronic disease risk: Snack-food products, nutritive content, and manufacturers in Philadelphia corner stores

Sean C. Lucan, Allison Karpyn, Sandy Sherman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Corner stores are part of the urban food environment that may contribute to obesity and diet-related diseases, particularly for low-income and minority children. The snack foods available in corner stores may be a particularly important aspect of an urban child s food environment. Unfortunately, there is little data on exactly what snack foods corner stores stock, or where these foods come from. We evaluated snack foods in 17 Philadelphia corner stores, located in three ethnically distinct, low-income school neighborhoods. We recorded the manufacturer, calories, fat, sugar, and sodium for all snack items, excluding candy and prepared foods. We then compared the nutritive content of assessed snack items to established dietary recommendations and a school nutrition standard. In total, stores stocked 452 kinds of snacks, with only 15% of items common between all three neighborhoods. Total and unique snacks and snack food manufacturers varied by neighborhood, but distributions in snack type varied negligibly: overall, there were no fruit snacks, no vegetable snacks, and only 3.6% of all snacks (by liberal definition) were whole grain. The remainder (96.4% of snacks) was highly processed foods. Five of65 manufacturers supplied 73.4% ofall kinds ofsnack foods. Depending on serving size definition, 80.0-91.5% of snack foods were "unhealthy" (by the school nutrition standard), including seven of 11 wholegrain products. A single snack item could supply 6-14% ofa day s recommended calories, fat, sugar, and sodium on average (or 56-169% at the extreme) for a "typical" child. We conclude that corner store snack food inventories are almost entirely unhealthful, and we discuss possible implications and next steps for research and intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)394-409
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Urban Health
Volume87
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

Snacks
Chronic Disease
food
Disease
Food
nutrition
low income
school
Serving Size
Sodium
Fats
Candy
vegetables
agricultural product

Keywords

  • Calories
  • Corner stores
  • Dietary guidelines
  • Dietary risk
  • Fat
  • Food environment/built environment
  • Food manufacturers
  • Low income
  • Minority
  • Snacks
  • Sodium
  • Sugar
  • Urban

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Storing empty calories and chronic disease risk : Snack-food products, nutritive content, and manufacturers in Philadelphia corner stores. / Lucan, Sean C.; Karpyn, Allison; Sherman, Sandy.

In: Journal of Urban Health, Vol. 87, No. 3, 05.2010, p. 394-409.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{225e7d09fbcd4625b92e77264b8e5df9,
title = "Storing empty calories and chronic disease risk: Snack-food products, nutritive content, and manufacturers in Philadelphia corner stores",
abstract = "Corner stores are part of the urban food environment that may contribute to obesity and diet-related diseases, particularly for low-income and minority children. The snack foods available in corner stores may be a particularly important aspect of an urban child s food environment. Unfortunately, there is little data on exactly what snack foods corner stores stock, or where these foods come from. We evaluated snack foods in 17 Philadelphia corner stores, located in three ethnically distinct, low-income school neighborhoods. We recorded the manufacturer, calories, fat, sugar, and sodium for all snack items, excluding candy and prepared foods. We then compared the nutritive content of assessed snack items to established dietary recommendations and a school nutrition standard. In total, stores stocked 452 kinds of snacks, with only 15{\%} of items common between all three neighborhoods. Total and unique snacks and snack food manufacturers varied by neighborhood, but distributions in snack type varied negligibly: overall, there were no fruit snacks, no vegetable snacks, and only 3.6{\%} of all snacks (by liberal definition) were whole grain. The remainder (96.4{\%} of snacks) was highly processed foods. Five of65 manufacturers supplied 73.4{\%} ofall kinds ofsnack foods. Depending on serving size definition, 80.0-91.5{\%} of snack foods were {"}unhealthy{"} (by the school nutrition standard), including seven of 11 wholegrain products. A single snack item could supply 6-14{\%} ofa day s recommended calories, fat, sugar, and sodium on average (or 56-169{\%} at the extreme) for a {"}typical{"} child. We conclude that corner store snack food inventories are almost entirely unhealthful, and we discuss possible implications and next steps for research and intervention.",
keywords = "Calories, Corner stores, Dietary guidelines, Dietary risk, Fat, Food environment/built environment, Food manufacturers, Low income, Minority, Snacks, Sodium, Sugar, Urban",
author = "Lucan, {Sean C.} and Allison Karpyn and Sandy Sherman",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s11524-010-9453-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "394--409",
journal = "Journal of Urban Health",
issn = "1099-3460",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Storing empty calories and chronic disease risk

T2 - Snack-food products, nutritive content, and manufacturers in Philadelphia corner stores

AU - Lucan, Sean C.

AU - Karpyn, Allison

AU - Sherman, Sandy

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Corner stores are part of the urban food environment that may contribute to obesity and diet-related diseases, particularly for low-income and minority children. The snack foods available in corner stores may be a particularly important aspect of an urban child s food environment. Unfortunately, there is little data on exactly what snack foods corner stores stock, or where these foods come from. We evaluated snack foods in 17 Philadelphia corner stores, located in three ethnically distinct, low-income school neighborhoods. We recorded the manufacturer, calories, fat, sugar, and sodium for all snack items, excluding candy and prepared foods. We then compared the nutritive content of assessed snack items to established dietary recommendations and a school nutrition standard. In total, stores stocked 452 kinds of snacks, with only 15% of items common between all three neighborhoods. Total and unique snacks and snack food manufacturers varied by neighborhood, but distributions in snack type varied negligibly: overall, there were no fruit snacks, no vegetable snacks, and only 3.6% of all snacks (by liberal definition) were whole grain. The remainder (96.4% of snacks) was highly processed foods. Five of65 manufacturers supplied 73.4% ofall kinds ofsnack foods. Depending on serving size definition, 80.0-91.5% of snack foods were "unhealthy" (by the school nutrition standard), including seven of 11 wholegrain products. A single snack item could supply 6-14% ofa day s recommended calories, fat, sugar, and sodium on average (or 56-169% at the extreme) for a "typical" child. We conclude that corner store snack food inventories are almost entirely unhealthful, and we discuss possible implications and next steps for research and intervention.

AB - Corner stores are part of the urban food environment that may contribute to obesity and diet-related diseases, particularly for low-income and minority children. The snack foods available in corner stores may be a particularly important aspect of an urban child s food environment. Unfortunately, there is little data on exactly what snack foods corner stores stock, or where these foods come from. We evaluated snack foods in 17 Philadelphia corner stores, located in three ethnically distinct, low-income school neighborhoods. We recorded the manufacturer, calories, fat, sugar, and sodium for all snack items, excluding candy and prepared foods. We then compared the nutritive content of assessed snack items to established dietary recommendations and a school nutrition standard. In total, stores stocked 452 kinds of snacks, with only 15% of items common between all three neighborhoods. Total and unique snacks and snack food manufacturers varied by neighborhood, but distributions in snack type varied negligibly: overall, there were no fruit snacks, no vegetable snacks, and only 3.6% of all snacks (by liberal definition) were whole grain. The remainder (96.4% of snacks) was highly processed foods. Five of65 manufacturers supplied 73.4% ofall kinds ofsnack foods. Depending on serving size definition, 80.0-91.5% of snack foods were "unhealthy" (by the school nutrition standard), including seven of 11 wholegrain products. A single snack item could supply 6-14% ofa day s recommended calories, fat, sugar, and sodium on average (or 56-169% at the extreme) for a "typical" child. We conclude that corner store snack food inventories are almost entirely unhealthful, and we discuss possible implications and next steps for research and intervention.

KW - Calories

KW - Corner stores

KW - Dietary guidelines

KW - Dietary risk

KW - Fat

KW - Food environment/built environment

KW - Food manufacturers

KW - Low income

KW - Minority

KW - Snacks

KW - Sodium

KW - Sugar

KW - Urban

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954654985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954654985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11524-010-9453-5

DO - 10.1007/s11524-010-9453-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 20405225

AN - SCOPUS:77954654985

VL - 87

SP - 394

EP - 409

JO - Journal of Urban Health

JF - Journal of Urban Health

SN - 1099-3460

IS - 3

ER -