Stimulus-specific adaptation to visual but not auditory motion direction in the barn owl's optic tectum

Dante F. Wasmuht, Jose L. Pena, Yoram Gutfreund

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whether the auditory and visual systems use a similar coding strategy to represent motion direction is an open question. We investigated this question in the barn owl's optic tectum (OT) testing stimulus-specific adaptation (SSA) to the direction of motion. SSA, the reduction of the response to a repetitive stimulus that does not generalize to other stimuli, has been well established in OT neurons. SSA suggests a separate representation of the adapted stimulus in upstream pathways. So far, only SSA to static stimuli has been studied in the OT. Here, we examined adaptation to moving auditory and visual stimuli. SSA to motion direction was examined using repeated presentations of moving stimuli, occasionally switching motion to the opposite direction. Acoustic motion was either mimicked by varying binaural spatial cues or implemented in free field using a speaker array. While OT neurons displayed SSA to motion direction in visual space, neither stimulation paradigms elicited significant SSA to auditory motion direction. These findings show a qualitative difference in how auditory and visual motion is processed in the OT and support the existence of dedicated circuitry for representing motion direction in the early stages of visual but not the auditory system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)610-621
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Journal of Neuroscience
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

Strigiformes
Superior Colliculi
Direction compound
Neurons
Acoustics
Cues

Keywords

  • motion processing
  • multisensory
  • neuroethology
  • sound localization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Stimulus-specific adaptation to visual but not auditory motion direction in the barn owl's optic tectum. / Wasmuht, Dante F.; Pena, Jose L.; Gutfreund, Yoram.

In: European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 45, No. 4, 01.02.2017, p. 610-621.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{346513c8eb23425a8a59b60e81e18d02,
title = "Stimulus-specific adaptation to visual but not auditory motion direction in the barn owl's optic tectum",
abstract = "Whether the auditory and visual systems use a similar coding strategy to represent motion direction is an open question. We investigated this question in the barn owl's optic tectum (OT) testing stimulus-specific adaptation (SSA) to the direction of motion. SSA, the reduction of the response to a repetitive stimulus that does not generalize to other stimuli, has been well established in OT neurons. SSA suggests a separate representation of the adapted stimulus in upstream pathways. So far, only SSA to static stimuli has been studied in the OT. Here, we examined adaptation to moving auditory and visual stimuli. SSA to motion direction was examined using repeated presentations of moving stimuli, occasionally switching motion to the opposite direction. Acoustic motion was either mimicked by varying binaural spatial cues or implemented in free field using a speaker array. While OT neurons displayed SSA to motion direction in visual space, neither stimulation paradigms elicited significant SSA to auditory motion direction. These findings show a qualitative difference in how auditory and visual motion is processed in the OT and support the existence of dedicated circuitry for representing motion direction in the early stages of visual but not the auditory system.",
keywords = "motion processing, multisensory, neuroethology, sound localization",
author = "Wasmuht, {Dante F.} and Pena, {Jose L.} and Yoram Gutfreund",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ejn.13505",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "610--621",
journal = "European Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0953-816X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stimulus-specific adaptation to visual but not auditory motion direction in the barn owl's optic tectum

AU - Wasmuht, Dante F.

AU - Pena, Jose L.

AU - Gutfreund, Yoram

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Whether the auditory and visual systems use a similar coding strategy to represent motion direction is an open question. We investigated this question in the barn owl's optic tectum (OT) testing stimulus-specific adaptation (SSA) to the direction of motion. SSA, the reduction of the response to a repetitive stimulus that does not generalize to other stimuli, has been well established in OT neurons. SSA suggests a separate representation of the adapted stimulus in upstream pathways. So far, only SSA to static stimuli has been studied in the OT. Here, we examined adaptation to moving auditory and visual stimuli. SSA to motion direction was examined using repeated presentations of moving stimuli, occasionally switching motion to the opposite direction. Acoustic motion was either mimicked by varying binaural spatial cues or implemented in free field using a speaker array. While OT neurons displayed SSA to motion direction in visual space, neither stimulation paradigms elicited significant SSA to auditory motion direction. These findings show a qualitative difference in how auditory and visual motion is processed in the OT and support the existence of dedicated circuitry for representing motion direction in the early stages of visual but not the auditory system.

AB - Whether the auditory and visual systems use a similar coding strategy to represent motion direction is an open question. We investigated this question in the barn owl's optic tectum (OT) testing stimulus-specific adaptation (SSA) to the direction of motion. SSA, the reduction of the response to a repetitive stimulus that does not generalize to other stimuli, has been well established in OT neurons. SSA suggests a separate representation of the adapted stimulus in upstream pathways. So far, only SSA to static stimuli has been studied in the OT. Here, we examined adaptation to moving auditory and visual stimuli. SSA to motion direction was examined using repeated presentations of moving stimuli, occasionally switching motion to the opposite direction. Acoustic motion was either mimicked by varying binaural spatial cues or implemented in free field using a speaker array. While OT neurons displayed SSA to motion direction in visual space, neither stimulation paradigms elicited significant SSA to auditory motion direction. These findings show a qualitative difference in how auditory and visual motion is processed in the OT and support the existence of dedicated circuitry for representing motion direction in the early stages of visual but not the auditory system.

KW - motion processing

KW - multisensory

KW - neuroethology

KW - sound localization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010505596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010505596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ejn.13505

DO - 10.1111/ejn.13505

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 610

EP - 621

JO - European Journal of Neuroscience

JF - European Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0953-816X

IS - 4

ER -