Statistical methods in rehabilitation research

Stanley F. Wainapel, H. L. Kayne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Of 128 articles in Volume 63 (1982) of the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 48 (37.5%) utilized some form of statistical methodology. The most commonly encountered methods were: (1) mean (with or without standard deviation or standard error); (2) analysis of variance (ANOVA); (3) t-tests; (4) simple correlation/linear regression; and (5) chi-square analysis. A critical review of the analytic statistics used in 40 of these articles revealed that only 23 (57.5%) were considered satisfactory in descriptive and methodologic terms. The most frequently encountered deficiencies were: (1) inadequate description of methods; (2) misuse of t-tests; (3) absence of appropriately complex statistical analysis. A greater understanding of and familiarity with biostatistics is essential for all readers of the Archives to allow critical evaluation of the rehabilitation literature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)322-324
Number of pages3
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume66
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Biostatistics
Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Linear Models
Analysis of Variance
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation Research
Recognition (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Statistical methods in rehabilitation research. / Wainapel, Stanley F.; Kayne, H. L.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 66, No. 5, 1985, p. 322-324.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7316da6d26e34a3fa3d83e00ad7f4df5,
title = "Statistical methods in rehabilitation research",
abstract = "Of 128 articles in Volume 63 (1982) of the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 48 (37.5{\%}) utilized some form of statistical methodology. The most commonly encountered methods were: (1) mean (with or without standard deviation or standard error); (2) analysis of variance (ANOVA); (3) t-tests; (4) simple correlation/linear regression; and (5) chi-square analysis. A critical review of the analytic statistics used in 40 of these articles revealed that only 23 (57.5{\%}) were considered satisfactory in descriptive and methodologic terms. The most frequently encountered deficiencies were: (1) inadequate description of methods; (2) misuse of t-tests; (3) absence of appropriately complex statistical analysis. A greater understanding of and familiarity with biostatistics is essential for all readers of the Archives to allow critical evaluation of the rehabilitation literature.",
author = "Wainapel, {Stanley F.} and Kayne, {H. L.}",
year = "1985",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "322--324",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistical methods in rehabilitation research

AU - Wainapel, Stanley F.

AU - Kayne, H. L.

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - Of 128 articles in Volume 63 (1982) of the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 48 (37.5%) utilized some form of statistical methodology. The most commonly encountered methods were: (1) mean (with or without standard deviation or standard error); (2) analysis of variance (ANOVA); (3) t-tests; (4) simple correlation/linear regression; and (5) chi-square analysis. A critical review of the analytic statistics used in 40 of these articles revealed that only 23 (57.5%) were considered satisfactory in descriptive and methodologic terms. The most frequently encountered deficiencies were: (1) inadequate description of methods; (2) misuse of t-tests; (3) absence of appropriately complex statistical analysis. A greater understanding of and familiarity with biostatistics is essential for all readers of the Archives to allow critical evaluation of the rehabilitation literature.

AB - Of 128 articles in Volume 63 (1982) of the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 48 (37.5%) utilized some form of statistical methodology. The most commonly encountered methods were: (1) mean (with or without standard deviation or standard error); (2) analysis of variance (ANOVA); (3) t-tests; (4) simple correlation/linear regression; and (5) chi-square analysis. A critical review of the analytic statistics used in 40 of these articles revealed that only 23 (57.5%) were considered satisfactory in descriptive and methodologic terms. The most frequently encountered deficiencies were: (1) inadequate description of methods; (2) misuse of t-tests; (3) absence of appropriately complex statistical analysis. A greater understanding of and familiarity with biostatistics is essential for all readers of the Archives to allow critical evaluation of the rehabilitation literature.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021811379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021811379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 4004522

AN - SCOPUS:0021811379

VL - 66

SP - 322

EP - 324

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 5

ER -