Sources of variability in waist and hip measurements in middle-aged women

Elizabeth G. Sonnenschein, Mimi Kim, Bernard S. Pasternack, Paolo G. Toniolo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The reliability of single measurements of waist and hip circumference and the ratio of waist circumference to hip circumference (a widely used measure of body fat distribution) has not been fully examined. The authors analyzed measurements of waist and hip circumference, as well as self-reported weight and height, repeated 3-6 times between 1986 and 1991 among 1,851 participants in the New York University Women's Health Study. Quetelet index (weight (kg)/height (m)2) was positively correlated with waist circumference (r = 0.88), hip circumference (r = 0.89), and waist/hip ratio (r = 0.52). Mean weight was positively correlated with the within-subject variance of waist circumference (r = 0.27) and, to a lesser degree, with the within-subject variance of hip circumference (r = 0.08) and waist/hip ratio (r = 0.10). The within-subject variance of weight was positively correlated with the within-subject variance of waist (r = 0.30) and hip (r = 0.23) measurements, and less so with waist/hip ratio (r = 0.05). Intraclass correlations for waist, hip, and waist/hip ratio were 0.89, 0.81, and 0.74, respectively; adjustment for Quetelet index reduced the intraclass correlations for waist and hip measures by 33% and 48%, respectively. Such adjustment can provide a more realistic determination of the reliability associated with an exposure variable in the design and analysis of studies investigating the relation between body fat distribution and disease. Am J Epidemiol 1993;138:301-9.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)301-309
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume138
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 1 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hip
Waist-Hip Ratio
Waist Circumference
Body Fat Distribution
Weights and Measures
Body Mass Index
Women's Health

Keywords

  • Anthropometry
  • Body composition
  • Body mass index
  • Reproducibility of results
  • Women

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Sonnenschein, E. G., Kim, M., Pasternack, B. S., & Toniolo, P. G. (1993). Sources of variability in waist and hip measurements in middle-aged women. American Journal of Epidemiology, 138(5), 301-309.

Sources of variability in waist and hip measurements in middle-aged women. / Sonnenschein, Elizabeth G.; Kim, Mimi; Pasternack, Bernard S.; Toniolo, Paolo G.

In: American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 138, No. 5, 01.09.1993, p. 301-309.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sonnenschein, EG, Kim, M, Pasternack, BS & Toniolo, PG 1993, 'Sources of variability in waist and hip measurements in middle-aged women', American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 138, no. 5, pp. 301-309.
Sonnenschein, Elizabeth G. ; Kim, Mimi ; Pasternack, Bernard S. ; Toniolo, Paolo G. / Sources of variability in waist and hip measurements in middle-aged women. In: American Journal of Epidemiology. 1993 ; Vol. 138, No. 5. pp. 301-309.
@article{dec6d05690154c4dad294c62758529ef,
title = "Sources of variability in waist and hip measurements in middle-aged women",
abstract = "The reliability of single measurements of waist and hip circumference and the ratio of waist circumference to hip circumference (a widely used measure of body fat distribution) has not been fully examined. The authors analyzed measurements of waist and hip circumference, as well as self-reported weight and height, repeated 3-6 times between 1986 and 1991 among 1,851 participants in the New York University Women's Health Study. Quetelet index (weight (kg)/height (m)2) was positively correlated with waist circumference (r = 0.88), hip circumference (r = 0.89), and waist/hip ratio (r = 0.52). Mean weight was positively correlated with the within-subject variance of waist circumference (r = 0.27) and, to a lesser degree, with the within-subject variance of hip circumference (r = 0.08) and waist/hip ratio (r = 0.10). The within-subject variance of weight was positively correlated with the within-subject variance of waist (r = 0.30) and hip (r = 0.23) measurements, and less so with waist/hip ratio (r = 0.05). Intraclass correlations for waist, hip, and waist/hip ratio were 0.89, 0.81, and 0.74, respectively; adjustment for Quetelet index reduced the intraclass correlations for waist and hip measures by 33{\%} and 48{\%}, respectively. Such adjustment can provide a more realistic determination of the reliability associated with an exposure variable in the design and analysis of studies investigating the relation between body fat distribution and disease. Am J Epidemiol 1993;138:301-9.",
keywords = "Anthropometry, Body composition, Body mass index, Reproducibility of results, Women",
author = "Sonnenschein, {Elizabeth G.} and Mimi Kim and Pasternack, {Bernard S.} and Toniolo, {Paolo G.}",
year = "1993",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "138",
pages = "301--309",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sources of variability in waist and hip measurements in middle-aged women

AU - Sonnenschein, Elizabeth G.

AU - Kim, Mimi

AU - Pasternack, Bernard S.

AU - Toniolo, Paolo G.

PY - 1993/9/1

Y1 - 1993/9/1

N2 - The reliability of single measurements of waist and hip circumference and the ratio of waist circumference to hip circumference (a widely used measure of body fat distribution) has not been fully examined. The authors analyzed measurements of waist and hip circumference, as well as self-reported weight and height, repeated 3-6 times between 1986 and 1991 among 1,851 participants in the New York University Women's Health Study. Quetelet index (weight (kg)/height (m)2) was positively correlated with waist circumference (r = 0.88), hip circumference (r = 0.89), and waist/hip ratio (r = 0.52). Mean weight was positively correlated with the within-subject variance of waist circumference (r = 0.27) and, to a lesser degree, with the within-subject variance of hip circumference (r = 0.08) and waist/hip ratio (r = 0.10). The within-subject variance of weight was positively correlated with the within-subject variance of waist (r = 0.30) and hip (r = 0.23) measurements, and less so with waist/hip ratio (r = 0.05). Intraclass correlations for waist, hip, and waist/hip ratio were 0.89, 0.81, and 0.74, respectively; adjustment for Quetelet index reduced the intraclass correlations for waist and hip measures by 33% and 48%, respectively. Such adjustment can provide a more realistic determination of the reliability associated with an exposure variable in the design and analysis of studies investigating the relation between body fat distribution and disease. Am J Epidemiol 1993;138:301-9.

AB - The reliability of single measurements of waist and hip circumference and the ratio of waist circumference to hip circumference (a widely used measure of body fat distribution) has not been fully examined. The authors analyzed measurements of waist and hip circumference, as well as self-reported weight and height, repeated 3-6 times between 1986 and 1991 among 1,851 participants in the New York University Women's Health Study. Quetelet index (weight (kg)/height (m)2) was positively correlated with waist circumference (r = 0.88), hip circumference (r = 0.89), and waist/hip ratio (r = 0.52). Mean weight was positively correlated with the within-subject variance of waist circumference (r = 0.27) and, to a lesser degree, with the within-subject variance of hip circumference (r = 0.08) and waist/hip ratio (r = 0.10). The within-subject variance of weight was positively correlated with the within-subject variance of waist (r = 0.30) and hip (r = 0.23) measurements, and less so with waist/hip ratio (r = 0.05). Intraclass correlations for waist, hip, and waist/hip ratio were 0.89, 0.81, and 0.74, respectively; adjustment for Quetelet index reduced the intraclass correlations for waist and hip measures by 33% and 48%, respectively. Such adjustment can provide a more realistic determination of the reliability associated with an exposure variable in the design and analysis of studies investigating the relation between body fat distribution and disease. Am J Epidemiol 1993;138:301-9.

KW - Anthropometry

KW - Body composition

KW - Body mass index

KW - Reproducibility of results

KW - Women

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027160683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027160683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8356968

AN - SCOPUS:0027160683

VL - 138

SP - 301

EP - 309

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 5

ER -