Social-emotional screening for infants and toddlers in primary care

Rahil D. Briggs, Erin M. Stettler, Ellen J. Silver, Rebecca D A Schrag, Meghna Nayak, Susan Chinitz, Andrew D. Racine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recommendations in pediatrics call for general developmental screening of young children; however, research suggests social-emotional development, in particular, is important as an initial indicator of general well-being versus risk. We aim to describe a program designed to identify the social-emotional status of young children in the pediatric setting by using the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE) as a universal screening tool, and to assess the effect of interventions by a colocated psychologist on changes in ASQ:SE scores over time. METHODS: In a prospective cohort design we analyzed scores on ASQ: SE surveys completed on children 6 to 36 months of age, to determine if children were at risk for problems in social-emotional development. The probability of remaining at risk over time was then compared between subjects receiving intervention by the psychologist, and those who declined intervention. Logit specifications were used in multivariate comparisons to control for a set of covariates. RESULTS: Three thousand one hundred and sixty-nine children were screened; 711 (22.4%) scored at or above the risk cutoff. Among the 711 at-risk children, 170 were rescreened. At the time of rescreening, those children who received intervention from the psychologist showed significant improvement on ASQ:SE scores compared with those who declined intervention (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Universal social-emotional screening in a busy pediatric practice is challenging. Significant percentages of children can be identified as being at risk for social-emotional problems, and colocation of a psychologist promotes the ability to effectively address young children's social-emotional development within their medical home.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPediatrics
Volume129
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2012

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Psychology
Social Problems
Pediatrics
Toddlers
Screening
Emotion
Primary Care
Patient-Centered Care
Aptitude
Surveys and Questionnaires
Psychologists
Research
Young children
Questionnaire

Keywords

  • Colocation
  • Infant mental health
  • Preventive mental health services
  • Social-emotional screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Social-emotional screening for infants and toddlers in primary care. / Briggs, Rahil D.; Stettler, Erin M.; Silver, Ellen J.; Schrag, Rebecca D A; Nayak, Meghna; Chinitz, Susan; Racine, Andrew D.

In: Pediatrics, Vol. 129, No. 2, 02.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Briggs, Rahil D. ; Stettler, Erin M. ; Silver, Ellen J. ; Schrag, Rebecca D A ; Nayak, Meghna ; Chinitz, Susan ; Racine, Andrew D. / Social-emotional screening for infants and toddlers in primary care. In: Pediatrics. 2012 ; Vol. 129, No. 2.
@article{0be396e59a584dcc8020fbd9a66cfce1,
title = "Social-emotional screening for infants and toddlers in primary care",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recommendations in pediatrics call for general developmental screening of young children; however, research suggests social-emotional development, in particular, is important as an initial indicator of general well-being versus risk. We aim to describe a program designed to identify the social-emotional status of young children in the pediatric setting by using the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE) as a universal screening tool, and to assess the effect of interventions by a colocated psychologist on changes in ASQ:SE scores over time. METHODS: In a prospective cohort design we analyzed scores on ASQ: SE surveys completed on children 6 to 36 months of age, to determine if children were at risk for problems in social-emotional development. The probability of remaining at risk over time was then compared between subjects receiving intervention by the psychologist, and those who declined intervention. Logit specifications were used in multivariate comparisons to control for a set of covariates. RESULTS: Three thousand one hundred and sixty-nine children were screened; 711 (22.4{\%}) scored at or above the risk cutoff. Among the 711 at-risk children, 170 were rescreened. At the time of rescreening, those children who received intervention from the psychologist showed significant improvement on ASQ:SE scores compared with those who declined intervention (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Universal social-emotional screening in a busy pediatric practice is challenging. Significant percentages of children can be identified as being at risk for social-emotional problems, and colocation of a psychologist promotes the ability to effectively address young children's social-emotional development within their medical home.",
keywords = "Colocation, Infant mental health, Preventive mental health services, Social-emotional screening",
author = "Briggs, {Rahil D.} and Stettler, {Erin M.} and Silver, {Ellen J.} and Schrag, {Rebecca D A} and Meghna Nayak and Susan Chinitz and Racine, {Andrew D.}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1542/peds.2010-2211",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "129",
journal = "Pediatrics",
issn = "0031-4005",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social-emotional screening for infants and toddlers in primary care

AU - Briggs, Rahil D.

AU - Stettler, Erin M.

AU - Silver, Ellen J.

AU - Schrag, Rebecca D A

AU - Nayak, Meghna

AU - Chinitz, Susan

AU - Racine, Andrew D.

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recommendations in pediatrics call for general developmental screening of young children; however, research suggests social-emotional development, in particular, is important as an initial indicator of general well-being versus risk. We aim to describe a program designed to identify the social-emotional status of young children in the pediatric setting by using the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE) as a universal screening tool, and to assess the effect of interventions by a colocated psychologist on changes in ASQ:SE scores over time. METHODS: In a prospective cohort design we analyzed scores on ASQ: SE surveys completed on children 6 to 36 months of age, to determine if children were at risk for problems in social-emotional development. The probability of remaining at risk over time was then compared between subjects receiving intervention by the psychologist, and those who declined intervention. Logit specifications were used in multivariate comparisons to control for a set of covariates. RESULTS: Three thousand one hundred and sixty-nine children were screened; 711 (22.4%) scored at or above the risk cutoff. Among the 711 at-risk children, 170 were rescreened. At the time of rescreening, those children who received intervention from the psychologist showed significant improvement on ASQ:SE scores compared with those who declined intervention (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Universal social-emotional screening in a busy pediatric practice is challenging. Significant percentages of children can be identified as being at risk for social-emotional problems, and colocation of a psychologist promotes the ability to effectively address young children's social-emotional development within their medical home.

AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recommendations in pediatrics call for general developmental screening of young children; however, research suggests social-emotional development, in particular, is important as an initial indicator of general well-being versus risk. We aim to describe a program designed to identify the social-emotional status of young children in the pediatric setting by using the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE) as a universal screening tool, and to assess the effect of interventions by a colocated psychologist on changes in ASQ:SE scores over time. METHODS: In a prospective cohort design we analyzed scores on ASQ: SE surveys completed on children 6 to 36 months of age, to determine if children were at risk for problems in social-emotional development. The probability of remaining at risk over time was then compared between subjects receiving intervention by the psychologist, and those who declined intervention. Logit specifications were used in multivariate comparisons to control for a set of covariates. RESULTS: Three thousand one hundred and sixty-nine children were screened; 711 (22.4%) scored at or above the risk cutoff. Among the 711 at-risk children, 170 were rescreened. At the time of rescreening, those children who received intervention from the psychologist showed significant improvement on ASQ:SE scores compared with those who declined intervention (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Universal social-emotional screening in a busy pediatric practice is challenging. Significant percentages of children can be identified as being at risk for social-emotional problems, and colocation of a psychologist promotes the ability to effectively address young children's social-emotional development within their medical home.

KW - Colocation

KW - Infant mental health

KW - Preventive mental health services

KW - Social-emotional screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856529126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856529126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/peds.2010-2211

DO - 10.1542/peds.2010-2211

M3 - Article

C2 - 22232304

AN - SCOPUS:84856529126

VL - 129

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

SN - 0031-4005

IS - 2

ER -