Social barriers to listing for adult liver transplantation: Their prevalence and association with program characteristics

Anna Flattau, Manhal Olaywi, Paul J. Gaglio, Paula Marcus, Paul Meissner, Emily B L Dorfman, John F. Reinus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social barriers to effective medical care are mandated to be routinely assessed as part of an evaluation for liver transplantation. This study explores how frequently liver transplant programs encounter these barriers in patients undergoing an evaluation and whether programs with higher proportions of Medicaid patients, historically disadvantaged minority patients, and rural patients encounter social barriers more frequently. A survey for assessing patient demographics and social barriers was electronically completed by representatives of 61 of 104 eligible US adult liver transplant programs (59%). Fifty-eight of the 61 programs identified themselves, and their characteristics were similar to those of all 104 US programs according to publicly available data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Social barriers were reported to be encountered sometimes (10%-30%) or frequently (>30%) by the 61 programs as follows: inadequate or unstable health insurance (68.9% of the programs), a chaotic social environment (63.9%), a lack of a care partner (60.7%), an inability to obtain transportation (49.2%), a low educational level (36.1%), inadequate housing (23.0%), a language barrier (19.7%), no reliable way of contacting the patient (16.4%), difficulty in obtaining child care (11.5%), and food insecurity (8.2%). The frequencies of perceived social barriers did not differ significantly between programs reporting higher or lower proportions of Medicaid, minority, or rural patients. Our analysis suggests that program-level operational planning for addressing social barriers to transplant listing should be considered regardless of the proportions of Medicaid-insured, racial or ethnic minority, and rural patients in the population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1167-1175
Number of pages9
JournalLiver Transplantation
Volume17
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2011

Fingerprint

Liver Transplantation
Medicaid
Transplants
Communication Barriers
Tissue and Organ Procurement
Social Environment
Food Supply
Liver
Program Evaluation
Organ Transplantation
Vulnerable Populations
Health Insurance
Child Care
Demography
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Transplantation
  • Hepatology

Cite this

Social barriers to listing for adult liver transplantation : Their prevalence and association with program characteristics. / Flattau, Anna; Olaywi, Manhal; Gaglio, Paul J.; Marcus, Paula; Meissner, Paul; Dorfman, Emily B L; Reinus, John F.

In: Liver Transplantation, Vol. 17, No. 10, 10.2011, p. 1167-1175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4cec04eac2f1408b9d3a289a6a299faa,
title = "Social barriers to listing for adult liver transplantation: Their prevalence and association with program characteristics",
abstract = "Social barriers to effective medical care are mandated to be routinely assessed as part of an evaluation for liver transplantation. This study explores how frequently liver transplant programs encounter these barriers in patients undergoing an evaluation and whether programs with higher proportions of Medicaid patients, historically disadvantaged minority patients, and rural patients encounter social barriers more frequently. A survey for assessing patient demographics and social barriers was electronically completed by representatives of 61 of 104 eligible US adult liver transplant programs (59{\%}). Fifty-eight of the 61 programs identified themselves, and their characteristics were similar to those of all 104 US programs according to publicly available data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Social barriers were reported to be encountered sometimes (10{\%}-30{\%}) or frequently (>30{\%}) by the 61 programs as follows: inadequate or unstable health insurance (68.9{\%} of the programs), a chaotic social environment (63.9{\%}), a lack of a care partner (60.7{\%}), an inability to obtain transportation (49.2{\%}), a low educational level (36.1{\%}), inadequate housing (23.0{\%}), a language barrier (19.7{\%}), no reliable way of contacting the patient (16.4{\%}), difficulty in obtaining child care (11.5{\%}), and food insecurity (8.2{\%}). The frequencies of perceived social barriers did not differ significantly between programs reporting higher or lower proportions of Medicaid, minority, or rural patients. Our analysis suggests that program-level operational planning for addressing social barriers to transplant listing should be considered regardless of the proportions of Medicaid-insured, racial or ethnic minority, and rural patients in the population.",
author = "Anna Flattau and Manhal Olaywi and Gaglio, {Paul J.} and Paula Marcus and Paul Meissner and Dorfman, {Emily B L} and Reinus, {John F.}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1002/lt.22357",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "1167--1175",
journal = "Liver Transplantation",
issn = "1527-6465",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social barriers to listing for adult liver transplantation

T2 - Their prevalence and association with program characteristics

AU - Flattau, Anna

AU - Olaywi, Manhal

AU - Gaglio, Paul J.

AU - Marcus, Paula

AU - Meissner, Paul

AU - Dorfman, Emily B L

AU - Reinus, John F.

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - Social barriers to effective medical care are mandated to be routinely assessed as part of an evaluation for liver transplantation. This study explores how frequently liver transplant programs encounter these barriers in patients undergoing an evaluation and whether programs with higher proportions of Medicaid patients, historically disadvantaged minority patients, and rural patients encounter social barriers more frequently. A survey for assessing patient demographics and social barriers was electronically completed by representatives of 61 of 104 eligible US adult liver transplant programs (59%). Fifty-eight of the 61 programs identified themselves, and their characteristics were similar to those of all 104 US programs according to publicly available data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Social barriers were reported to be encountered sometimes (10%-30%) or frequently (>30%) by the 61 programs as follows: inadequate or unstable health insurance (68.9% of the programs), a chaotic social environment (63.9%), a lack of a care partner (60.7%), an inability to obtain transportation (49.2%), a low educational level (36.1%), inadequate housing (23.0%), a language barrier (19.7%), no reliable way of contacting the patient (16.4%), difficulty in obtaining child care (11.5%), and food insecurity (8.2%). The frequencies of perceived social barriers did not differ significantly between programs reporting higher or lower proportions of Medicaid, minority, or rural patients. Our analysis suggests that program-level operational planning for addressing social barriers to transplant listing should be considered regardless of the proportions of Medicaid-insured, racial or ethnic minority, and rural patients in the population.

AB - Social barriers to effective medical care are mandated to be routinely assessed as part of an evaluation for liver transplantation. This study explores how frequently liver transplant programs encounter these barriers in patients undergoing an evaluation and whether programs with higher proportions of Medicaid patients, historically disadvantaged minority patients, and rural patients encounter social barriers more frequently. A survey for assessing patient demographics and social barriers was electronically completed by representatives of 61 of 104 eligible US adult liver transplant programs (59%). Fifty-eight of the 61 programs identified themselves, and their characteristics were similar to those of all 104 US programs according to publicly available data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Social barriers were reported to be encountered sometimes (10%-30%) or frequently (>30%) by the 61 programs as follows: inadequate or unstable health insurance (68.9% of the programs), a chaotic social environment (63.9%), a lack of a care partner (60.7%), an inability to obtain transportation (49.2%), a low educational level (36.1%), inadequate housing (23.0%), a language barrier (19.7%), no reliable way of contacting the patient (16.4%), difficulty in obtaining child care (11.5%), and food insecurity (8.2%). The frequencies of perceived social barriers did not differ significantly between programs reporting higher or lower proportions of Medicaid, minority, or rural patients. Our analysis suggests that program-level operational planning for addressing social barriers to transplant listing should be considered regardless of the proportions of Medicaid-insured, racial or ethnic minority, and rural patients in the population.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053223523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053223523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lt.22357

DO - 10.1002/lt.22357

M3 - Article

C2 - 21656658

AN - SCOPUS:80053223523

VL - 17

SP - 1167

EP - 1175

JO - Liver Transplantation

JF - Liver Transplantation

SN - 1527-6465

IS - 10

ER -