Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy

A single center experience

Pratibha Vemulapalli, Emmanuel Atta Agaba, Diego Camacho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) is a variation in which trocar scars are hidden in the umbilicus. We sought to determine whether SILS cholecystectomy is a safe alternative to a conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our series of 205 SIL cholecystectomies (SILC) performed between May 2008-June 2010. The first 50 cases were done by initially insufflating the abdomen with a veress needle through the umbilicus and then placing 3, 5 mm ports in the umbilicus. The remaining cases were performed using a cut down approach at the umbilicus, followed by placement of a three-trocar SILS port under direct vision. Results: Two hundred and five patients (M:F = 48:157) underwent SILC during the study period. Median age was 45 (range = 21-62). Mean BMI range was 35 (range = 21-44). Mean operative time was 60 min (range = 40-120 min) and a follow up period that ranges from 1 to 21 months. Patient pathologies included: Chronic cholecystitis (74%), Acute cholecystitis (17%), Choledocholithiasis (6.8%), Gallstone pancreatitis (2%) and gallbladder polyp (0.5%). An additional port was placed in the umbilicus in 3% of cases. No cases were converted to open. Complications occurred in 4% of cases including: 3 patients with retained stones, 2 patients with post-op wound infection, 2 patients with incisional hernias in the umbilical region and 1patient with a veress injury. Conclusion: SIL cholecystectomy can be done safely. It offers a better cosmetic result, which may lead to greater patient satisfaction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)410-413
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Journal of Surgery
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Umbilicus
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholecystectomy
Laparoscopy
Surgical Instruments
Choledocholithiasis
Acute Cholecystitis
Cholecystitis
Gallstones
Wound Infection
Operative Time
Polyps
Gallbladder
Patient Satisfaction
Cosmetics
Pancreatitis
Abdomen
Needles
Cicatrix
Pathology

Keywords

  • Incisional hernia
  • SILS cholecystectomy
  • Surgical site infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy : A single center experience. / Vemulapalli, Pratibha; Agaba, Emmanuel Atta; Camacho, Diego.

In: International Journal of Surgery, Vol. 9, No. 5, 2011, p. 410-413.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vemulapalli, Pratibha ; Agaba, Emmanuel Atta ; Camacho, Diego. / Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy : A single center experience. In: International Journal of Surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 9, No. 5. pp. 410-413.
@article{fc44fb66ea074ed99bfcfecd832203bb,
title = "Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A single center experience",
abstract = "Introduction: Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) is a variation in which trocar scars are hidden in the umbilicus. We sought to determine whether SILS cholecystectomy is a safe alternative to a conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our series of 205 SIL cholecystectomies (SILC) performed between May 2008-June 2010. The first 50 cases were done by initially insufflating the abdomen with a veress needle through the umbilicus and then placing 3, 5 mm ports in the umbilicus. The remaining cases were performed using a cut down approach at the umbilicus, followed by placement of a three-trocar SILS port under direct vision. Results: Two hundred and five patients (M:F = 48:157) underwent SILC during the study period. Median age was 45 (range = 21-62). Mean BMI range was 35 (range = 21-44). Mean operative time was 60 min (range = 40-120 min) and a follow up period that ranges from 1 to 21 months. Patient pathologies included: Chronic cholecystitis (74{\%}), Acute cholecystitis (17{\%}), Choledocholithiasis (6.8{\%}), Gallstone pancreatitis (2{\%}) and gallbladder polyp (0.5{\%}). An additional port was placed in the umbilicus in 3{\%} of cases. No cases were converted to open. Complications occurred in 4{\%} of cases including: 3 patients with retained stones, 2 patients with post-op wound infection, 2 patients with incisional hernias in the umbilical region and 1patient with a veress injury. Conclusion: SIL cholecystectomy can be done safely. It offers a better cosmetic result, which may lead to greater patient satisfaction.",
keywords = "Incisional hernia, SILS cholecystectomy, Surgical site infection",
author = "Pratibha Vemulapalli and Agaba, {Emmanuel Atta} and Diego Camacho",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.04.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "410--413",
journal = "International Journal of Surgery",
issn = "1743-9191",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy

T2 - A single center experience

AU - Vemulapalli, Pratibha

AU - Agaba, Emmanuel Atta

AU - Camacho, Diego

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Introduction: Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) is a variation in which trocar scars are hidden in the umbilicus. We sought to determine whether SILS cholecystectomy is a safe alternative to a conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our series of 205 SIL cholecystectomies (SILC) performed between May 2008-June 2010. The first 50 cases were done by initially insufflating the abdomen with a veress needle through the umbilicus and then placing 3, 5 mm ports in the umbilicus. The remaining cases were performed using a cut down approach at the umbilicus, followed by placement of a three-trocar SILS port under direct vision. Results: Two hundred and five patients (M:F = 48:157) underwent SILC during the study period. Median age was 45 (range = 21-62). Mean BMI range was 35 (range = 21-44). Mean operative time was 60 min (range = 40-120 min) and a follow up period that ranges from 1 to 21 months. Patient pathologies included: Chronic cholecystitis (74%), Acute cholecystitis (17%), Choledocholithiasis (6.8%), Gallstone pancreatitis (2%) and gallbladder polyp (0.5%). An additional port was placed in the umbilicus in 3% of cases. No cases were converted to open. Complications occurred in 4% of cases including: 3 patients with retained stones, 2 patients with post-op wound infection, 2 patients with incisional hernias in the umbilical region and 1patient with a veress injury. Conclusion: SIL cholecystectomy can be done safely. It offers a better cosmetic result, which may lead to greater patient satisfaction.

AB - Introduction: Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) is a variation in which trocar scars are hidden in the umbilicus. We sought to determine whether SILS cholecystectomy is a safe alternative to a conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our series of 205 SIL cholecystectomies (SILC) performed between May 2008-June 2010. The first 50 cases were done by initially insufflating the abdomen with a veress needle through the umbilicus and then placing 3, 5 mm ports in the umbilicus. The remaining cases were performed using a cut down approach at the umbilicus, followed by placement of a three-trocar SILS port under direct vision. Results: Two hundred and five patients (M:F = 48:157) underwent SILC during the study period. Median age was 45 (range = 21-62). Mean BMI range was 35 (range = 21-44). Mean operative time was 60 min (range = 40-120 min) and a follow up period that ranges from 1 to 21 months. Patient pathologies included: Chronic cholecystitis (74%), Acute cholecystitis (17%), Choledocholithiasis (6.8%), Gallstone pancreatitis (2%) and gallbladder polyp (0.5%). An additional port was placed in the umbilicus in 3% of cases. No cases were converted to open. Complications occurred in 4% of cases including: 3 patients with retained stones, 2 patients with post-op wound infection, 2 patients with incisional hernias in the umbilical region and 1patient with a veress injury. Conclusion: SIL cholecystectomy can be done safely. It offers a better cosmetic result, which may lead to greater patient satisfaction.

KW - Incisional hernia

KW - SILS cholecystectomy

KW - Surgical site infection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959500722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959500722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.04.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.04.001

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 410

EP - 413

JO - International Journal of Surgery

JF - International Journal of Surgery

SN - 1743-9191

IS - 5

ER -