Simulation of Shoulder Dystocia for Skill Acquisition and Competency Assessment: A Systematic Review and Gap Analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Mastery of shoulder dystocia management skills acquired via simulation training can reduce neonatal brachial plexus injury by 66% to 90%. However, the correlation between simulation drills and reduction in clinical injuries has been inconsistently replicated, and establishing a causal relationship between simulation training and reduction of adverse clinical events from shoulder dystocia is infeasible due to ethical limitations. Nevertheless, professional liability insurance carriers increasingly are mandating simulation-based rehearsal and competency assessment of their covered obstetric providers' shoulder dystocia management skills - a high-stakes demand that will require rapid scaling up of access to quality shoulder dystocia simulation. However, questions remain about differing simulation training schemes and instructional content used among clinically effective and ineffective educational interventions. This review of original research compares curricular content of shoulder dystocia simulation and reveals several critical gaps: (1) prescriptive instruction prioritizing maneuvers shown to decrease strain on the brachial plexus is inconsistently used. (2) Proscriptive instruction to avoid placing excessive and laterally directed traction on the head or to observe a brief hands-off period before attempting traction is infrequently explicit. (3) Neither relative effectiveness nor potential interaction between prescriptive and proscriptive elements of instruction has been examined directly. (4) Reliability of high-fidelity mannequins capable of objective measurement of clinician-applied traction force as compared with subjective assessment of provider competence is unknown. Further study is needed to address these gaps and inform efficient and effective implementation of clinically translatable shoulder dystocia simulation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)268-283
Number of pages16
JournalSimulation in Healthcare
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dystocia
Simulation Training
Obstetrics
simulation
Insurance
Traction
Simulation
Brachial Plexus
Arm Injuries
instruction
Liability Insurance
Handoff
Manikins
Legal Liability
Insurance Carriers
Mandrillus
insurance carrier
Fidelity
liability insurance
Mental Competency

Keywords

  • brachial plexus injury
  • haptic simulation
  • high-fidelity mannequins
  • Prescriptive instruction
  • proscriptive instruction
  • risk management
  • virtual reality simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Education
  • Modeling and Simulation

Cite this

@article{bd6c221cc9dd4b1e99cf352fc512694c,
title = "Simulation of Shoulder Dystocia for Skill Acquisition and Competency Assessment: A Systematic Review and Gap Analysis",
abstract = "Mastery of shoulder dystocia management skills acquired via simulation training can reduce neonatal brachial plexus injury by 66{\%} to 90{\%}. However, the correlation between simulation drills and reduction in clinical injuries has been inconsistently replicated, and establishing a causal relationship between simulation training and reduction of adverse clinical events from shoulder dystocia is infeasible due to ethical limitations. Nevertheless, professional liability insurance carriers increasingly are mandating simulation-based rehearsal and competency assessment of their covered obstetric providers' shoulder dystocia management skills - a high-stakes demand that will require rapid scaling up of access to quality shoulder dystocia simulation. However, questions remain about differing simulation training schemes and instructional content used among clinically effective and ineffective educational interventions. This review of original research compares curricular content of shoulder dystocia simulation and reveals several critical gaps: (1) prescriptive instruction prioritizing maneuvers shown to decrease strain on the brachial plexus is inconsistently used. (2) Proscriptive instruction to avoid placing excessive and laterally directed traction on the head or to observe a brief hands-off period before attempting traction is infrequently explicit. (3) Neither relative effectiveness nor potential interaction between prescriptive and proscriptive elements of instruction has been examined directly. (4) Reliability of high-fidelity mannequins capable of objective measurement of clinician-applied traction force as compared with subjective assessment of provider competence is unknown. Further study is needed to address these gaps and inform efficient and effective implementation of clinically translatable shoulder dystocia simulation.",
keywords = "brachial plexus injury, haptic simulation, high-fidelity mannequins, Prescriptive instruction, proscriptive instruction, risk management, virtual reality simulation",
author = "{Gurewitsch Allen}, {Edith D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SIH.0000000000000292",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "268--283",
journal = "Simulation in Healthcare",
issn = "1559-2332",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simulation of Shoulder Dystocia for Skill Acquisition and Competency Assessment

T2 - A Systematic Review and Gap Analysis

AU - Gurewitsch Allen, Edith D.

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Mastery of shoulder dystocia management skills acquired via simulation training can reduce neonatal brachial plexus injury by 66% to 90%. However, the correlation between simulation drills and reduction in clinical injuries has been inconsistently replicated, and establishing a causal relationship between simulation training and reduction of adverse clinical events from shoulder dystocia is infeasible due to ethical limitations. Nevertheless, professional liability insurance carriers increasingly are mandating simulation-based rehearsal and competency assessment of their covered obstetric providers' shoulder dystocia management skills - a high-stakes demand that will require rapid scaling up of access to quality shoulder dystocia simulation. However, questions remain about differing simulation training schemes and instructional content used among clinically effective and ineffective educational interventions. This review of original research compares curricular content of shoulder dystocia simulation and reveals several critical gaps: (1) prescriptive instruction prioritizing maneuvers shown to decrease strain on the brachial plexus is inconsistently used. (2) Proscriptive instruction to avoid placing excessive and laterally directed traction on the head or to observe a brief hands-off period before attempting traction is infrequently explicit. (3) Neither relative effectiveness nor potential interaction between prescriptive and proscriptive elements of instruction has been examined directly. (4) Reliability of high-fidelity mannequins capable of objective measurement of clinician-applied traction force as compared with subjective assessment of provider competence is unknown. Further study is needed to address these gaps and inform efficient and effective implementation of clinically translatable shoulder dystocia simulation.

AB - Mastery of shoulder dystocia management skills acquired via simulation training can reduce neonatal brachial plexus injury by 66% to 90%. However, the correlation between simulation drills and reduction in clinical injuries has been inconsistently replicated, and establishing a causal relationship between simulation training and reduction of adverse clinical events from shoulder dystocia is infeasible due to ethical limitations. Nevertheless, professional liability insurance carriers increasingly are mandating simulation-based rehearsal and competency assessment of their covered obstetric providers' shoulder dystocia management skills - a high-stakes demand that will require rapid scaling up of access to quality shoulder dystocia simulation. However, questions remain about differing simulation training schemes and instructional content used among clinically effective and ineffective educational interventions. This review of original research compares curricular content of shoulder dystocia simulation and reveals several critical gaps: (1) prescriptive instruction prioritizing maneuvers shown to decrease strain on the brachial plexus is inconsistently used. (2) Proscriptive instruction to avoid placing excessive and laterally directed traction on the head or to observe a brief hands-off period before attempting traction is infrequently explicit. (3) Neither relative effectiveness nor potential interaction between prescriptive and proscriptive elements of instruction has been examined directly. (4) Reliability of high-fidelity mannequins capable of objective measurement of clinician-applied traction force as compared with subjective assessment of provider competence is unknown. Further study is needed to address these gaps and inform efficient and effective implementation of clinically translatable shoulder dystocia simulation.

KW - brachial plexus injury

KW - haptic simulation

KW - high-fidelity mannequins

KW - Prescriptive instruction

KW - proscriptive instruction

KW - risk management

KW - virtual reality simulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051586451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051586451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000292

DO - 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000292

M3 - Article

C2 - 29381590

AN - SCOPUS:85051586451

VL - 13

SP - 268

EP - 283

JO - Simulation in Healthcare

JF - Simulation in Healthcare

SN - 1559-2332

IS - 4

ER -