Similarities and Differences in the Treatment of Spine Trauma between Surgical Specialties and Location of Practice

Jonathan N. Grauer, Alexander R. Vaccaro, John M. Beiner, Brian K. Kwon, Alan S. Hilibrand, James S. Harrop, Greg Anderson, John Hurlbert, Michael G. Fehlings, Steve C. Ludwig, Rune Hedlund, Paul M. Arnold, Christopher M. Bono, Darrel S. Brodke, Marcel F S Dvorak, Charles G. Fischer, John B. Sledge, Christopher I. Shaffrey, David G. Schwartz, William R. SearsCurtis Dickman, Alok Sharan, Todd J. Albert, Glenn R. Rechtine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. Questionnaires administered to practicing orthopedic and neurosurgical spine surgeons from various regions of the United States and abroad. Objectives. To determine similarities and differences in the treatment of spinal trauma. Summary of Background Data. Spinal trauma is generally referred to subspecialists of orthopedic or neurosurgical training. Prior studies have suggested that there is significant variability in the management of such injuries. Methods. Questionnaires based on eight clinical scenarios of commonly encountered cervical. thoracic, and lumbar injuries were administered to 35 experienced spinal surgeons. Surgeons completed profile information and answered approximately one dozen questions for each case. Data were analyzed with SPSS software to determine the levels of agreement and characteristics of respondents that might account for a lack of agreement on particular aspects of management. Results. Of the 35 surgeons completing the questionnaire, 63% were orthopedists, 37% were neurosurgeons, and 80% had been in practice for more than 5 years. Considerable agreement was found in the majority of clinical decisions, including whether or not to operate and the timing of surgery. Of the differences noted, neurosurgeons were more likely to obtain a MRI, and orthopedists were more likely to use autograft as a sole graft material. Physicians from abroad were, in general, more likely to operate and to use an anterior approach during surgery than physicians from the northeastern United States. Conclusions. More commonalities were identified in the management of spinal trauma than previously reported. When found, variability in opinion was related to professional and regional differences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)685-696
Number of pages12
JournalSpine
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Surgical Specialties
Spine
Wounds and Injuries
Orthopedics
Physicians
Thoracic Injuries
New England
Autografts
Therapeutics
Software
Transplants
Surveys and Questionnaires
Surgeons
Orthopedic Surgeons
Neurosurgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Grauer, J. N., Vaccaro, A. R., Beiner, J. M., Kwon, B. K., Hilibrand, A. S., Harrop, J. S., ... Rechtine, G. R. (2004). Similarities and Differences in the Treatment of Spine Trauma between Surgical Specialties and Location of Practice. Spine, 29(6), 685-696. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000115137.11276.0E

Similarities and Differences in the Treatment of Spine Trauma between Surgical Specialties and Location of Practice. / Grauer, Jonathan N.; Vaccaro, Alexander R.; Beiner, John M.; Kwon, Brian K.; Hilibrand, Alan S.; Harrop, James S.; Anderson, Greg; Hurlbert, John; Fehlings, Michael G.; Ludwig, Steve C.; Hedlund, Rune; Arnold, Paul M.; Bono, Christopher M.; Brodke, Darrel S.; Dvorak, Marcel F S; Fischer, Charles G.; Sledge, John B.; Shaffrey, Christopher I.; Schwartz, David G.; Sears, William R.; Dickman, Curtis; Sharan, Alok; Albert, Todd J.; Rechtine, Glenn R.

In: Spine, Vol. 29, No. 6, 15.03.2004, p. 685-696.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Grauer, JN, Vaccaro, AR, Beiner, JM, Kwon, BK, Hilibrand, AS, Harrop, JS, Anderson, G, Hurlbert, J, Fehlings, MG, Ludwig, SC, Hedlund, R, Arnold, PM, Bono, CM, Brodke, DS, Dvorak, MFS, Fischer, CG, Sledge, JB, Shaffrey, CI, Schwartz, DG, Sears, WR, Dickman, C, Sharan, A, Albert, TJ & Rechtine, GR 2004, 'Similarities and Differences in the Treatment of Spine Trauma between Surgical Specialties and Location of Practice', Spine, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 685-696. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000115137.11276.0E
Grauer, Jonathan N. ; Vaccaro, Alexander R. ; Beiner, John M. ; Kwon, Brian K. ; Hilibrand, Alan S. ; Harrop, James S. ; Anderson, Greg ; Hurlbert, John ; Fehlings, Michael G. ; Ludwig, Steve C. ; Hedlund, Rune ; Arnold, Paul M. ; Bono, Christopher M. ; Brodke, Darrel S. ; Dvorak, Marcel F S ; Fischer, Charles G. ; Sledge, John B. ; Shaffrey, Christopher I. ; Schwartz, David G. ; Sears, William R. ; Dickman, Curtis ; Sharan, Alok ; Albert, Todd J. ; Rechtine, Glenn R. / Similarities and Differences in the Treatment of Spine Trauma between Surgical Specialties and Location of Practice. In: Spine. 2004 ; Vol. 29, No. 6. pp. 685-696.
@article{3e32d1ef217e463facae73b99518972c,
title = "Similarities and Differences in the Treatment of Spine Trauma between Surgical Specialties and Location of Practice",
abstract = "Study Design. Questionnaires administered to practicing orthopedic and neurosurgical spine surgeons from various regions of the United States and abroad. Objectives. To determine similarities and differences in the treatment of spinal trauma. Summary of Background Data. Spinal trauma is generally referred to subspecialists of orthopedic or neurosurgical training. Prior studies have suggested that there is significant variability in the management of such injuries. Methods. Questionnaires based on eight clinical scenarios of commonly encountered cervical. thoracic, and lumbar injuries were administered to 35 experienced spinal surgeons. Surgeons completed profile information and answered approximately one dozen questions for each case. Data were analyzed with SPSS software to determine the levels of agreement and characteristics of respondents that might account for a lack of agreement on particular aspects of management. Results. Of the 35 surgeons completing the questionnaire, 63{\%} were orthopedists, 37{\%} were neurosurgeons, and 80{\%} had been in practice for more than 5 years. Considerable agreement was found in the majority of clinical decisions, including whether or not to operate and the timing of surgery. Of the differences noted, neurosurgeons were more likely to obtain a MRI, and orthopedists were more likely to use autograft as a sole graft material. Physicians from abroad were, in general, more likely to operate and to use an anterior approach during surgery than physicians from the northeastern United States. Conclusions. More commonalities were identified in the management of spinal trauma than previously reported. When found, variability in opinion was related to professional and regional differences.",
author = "Grauer, {Jonathan N.} and Vaccaro, {Alexander R.} and Beiner, {John M.} and Kwon, {Brian K.} and Hilibrand, {Alan S.} and Harrop, {James S.} and Greg Anderson and John Hurlbert and Fehlings, {Michael G.} and Ludwig, {Steve C.} and Rune Hedlund and Arnold, {Paul M.} and Bono, {Christopher M.} and Brodke, {Darrel S.} and Dvorak, {Marcel F S} and Fischer, {Charles G.} and Sledge, {John B.} and Shaffrey, {Christopher I.} and Schwartz, {David G.} and Sears, {William R.} and Curtis Dickman and Alok Sharan and Albert, {Todd J.} and Rechtine, {Glenn R.}",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/01.BRS.0000115137.11276.0E",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "685--696",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Similarities and Differences in the Treatment of Spine Trauma between Surgical Specialties and Location of Practice

AU - Grauer, Jonathan N.

AU - Vaccaro, Alexander R.

AU - Beiner, John M.

AU - Kwon, Brian K.

AU - Hilibrand, Alan S.

AU - Harrop, James S.

AU - Anderson, Greg

AU - Hurlbert, John

AU - Fehlings, Michael G.

AU - Ludwig, Steve C.

AU - Hedlund, Rune

AU - Arnold, Paul M.

AU - Bono, Christopher M.

AU - Brodke, Darrel S.

AU - Dvorak, Marcel F S

AU - Fischer, Charles G.

AU - Sledge, John B.

AU - Shaffrey, Christopher I.

AU - Schwartz, David G.

AU - Sears, William R.

AU - Dickman, Curtis

AU - Sharan, Alok

AU - Albert, Todd J.

AU - Rechtine, Glenn R.

PY - 2004/3/15

Y1 - 2004/3/15

N2 - Study Design. Questionnaires administered to practicing orthopedic and neurosurgical spine surgeons from various regions of the United States and abroad. Objectives. To determine similarities and differences in the treatment of spinal trauma. Summary of Background Data. Spinal trauma is generally referred to subspecialists of orthopedic or neurosurgical training. Prior studies have suggested that there is significant variability in the management of such injuries. Methods. Questionnaires based on eight clinical scenarios of commonly encountered cervical. thoracic, and lumbar injuries were administered to 35 experienced spinal surgeons. Surgeons completed profile information and answered approximately one dozen questions for each case. Data were analyzed with SPSS software to determine the levels of agreement and characteristics of respondents that might account for a lack of agreement on particular aspects of management. Results. Of the 35 surgeons completing the questionnaire, 63% were orthopedists, 37% were neurosurgeons, and 80% had been in practice for more than 5 years. Considerable agreement was found in the majority of clinical decisions, including whether or not to operate and the timing of surgery. Of the differences noted, neurosurgeons were more likely to obtain a MRI, and orthopedists were more likely to use autograft as a sole graft material. Physicians from abroad were, in general, more likely to operate and to use an anterior approach during surgery than physicians from the northeastern United States. Conclusions. More commonalities were identified in the management of spinal trauma than previously reported. When found, variability in opinion was related to professional and regional differences.

AB - Study Design. Questionnaires administered to practicing orthopedic and neurosurgical spine surgeons from various regions of the United States and abroad. Objectives. To determine similarities and differences in the treatment of spinal trauma. Summary of Background Data. Spinal trauma is generally referred to subspecialists of orthopedic or neurosurgical training. Prior studies have suggested that there is significant variability in the management of such injuries. Methods. Questionnaires based on eight clinical scenarios of commonly encountered cervical. thoracic, and lumbar injuries were administered to 35 experienced spinal surgeons. Surgeons completed profile information and answered approximately one dozen questions for each case. Data were analyzed with SPSS software to determine the levels of agreement and characteristics of respondents that might account for a lack of agreement on particular aspects of management. Results. Of the 35 surgeons completing the questionnaire, 63% were orthopedists, 37% were neurosurgeons, and 80% had been in practice for more than 5 years. Considerable agreement was found in the majority of clinical decisions, including whether or not to operate and the timing of surgery. Of the differences noted, neurosurgeons were more likely to obtain a MRI, and orthopedists were more likely to use autograft as a sole graft material. Physicians from abroad were, in general, more likely to operate and to use an anterior approach during surgery than physicians from the northeastern United States. Conclusions. More commonalities were identified in the management of spinal trauma than previously reported. When found, variability in opinion was related to professional and regional differences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12144286015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12144286015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.BRS.0000115137.11276.0E

DO - 10.1097/01.BRS.0000115137.11276.0E

M3 - Article

C2 - 15014280

AN - SCOPUS:12144286015

VL - 29

SP - 685

EP - 696

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 6

ER -