Silent cerebral events/lesions related to atrial fibrillation ablation: A clinical review

Thomas Deneke, Pierre Jais, Marco Scaglione, Rainer Schmitt, Luigi Di Biase, Georgios Christopoulos, Anja Schade, Andreas Mügge, Martin Bansmann, Karin Nentwich, Patrick Müller, Joachim Krug, Markus Roos, Phillip Halbfass, Andrea Natale, Fiorenzo Gaita, David Haines

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has identified a high incidence of cerebral ischemia in asymptomatic patients after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation (silent). Detection of cerebral ischemic events on MRI is based on acute hyperintense lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging. In the literature, the incidence is related to specifications of MRI and depends on the definition applied. In comparative studies, silent cerebral events (SCE, diffusion-weighted MRI [DWI] positive only) appear to be approximately 3 times more common compared to using a definition of silent cerebral lesions (SCL; without fluid attenuated inverse recovery sequence [FLAIR] positivity). Whereas the FLAIR sequence may turn positive within days after the ischemic event, SCE definition is highly sensitive for early phases of ischemic brain damage. SCE/SCL appear to represent cerebral ischemic infarcts and determine the "embolic fingerprint" of a specific ablation technology and strategy used. The optimum time point for detecting SCE is early after AF ablation (24-72 hours), whereas detection of SCL can only be performed within the first 2-7 days (due to delay of FLAIR positivity). Different technology-, procedure-, and patient-related parameters have been identified to play a role in the multifactorial genesis of SCE/SCL. In recent years, evidence has been gathered that there may be differences of SCE/SCL rates depending upon the ablation technology used, but small patient numbers and a large number of potential confounders hamper all studies. As major findings of recent studies, mode of periprocedural and intraprocedural anticoagulation has been identified as a major predictor for incidences of SCE/SCL. Whereas procedural characteristics related to higher SCE/SCL-rates may be modified, unchangeable patient-related factors should be taken into account for future individualized risk assessment. Novel ablation devices introduced into the market should be tested for their potential embolic fingerprint and refinements of ablation procedures to reduce their embolic potential should be prompted. The knowledge of "best practice" in terms of low SCE/SCL rates has prompted changes in work-flow, which have been implemented into ablation procedures using novel ablation devices. So far, no study has linked SCE/SCL to neuropsychological decline and the low number of AF-ablation-associated events needs to be weighted against the multitude of preexisting asymptomatic MRI-detected brain lesions related to the course of AF itself. Future studies are needed to evaluate if more white matter hyperintensities due to AF may be prevented by AF ablation (producing only a small number of SCE/SCL).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)455-463
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

Atrial Fibrillation
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Dermatoglyphics
Technology
Incidence
Brain
Equipment and Supplies
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Workflow
Brain Ischemia
Practice Guidelines

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation
  • catheter ablation
  • cryoablation
  • silent cerebral infarction
  • stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Silent cerebral events/lesions related to atrial fibrillation ablation : A clinical review. / Deneke, Thomas; Jais, Pierre; Scaglione, Marco; Schmitt, Rainer; Di Biase, Luigi; Christopoulos, Georgios; Schade, Anja; Mügge, Andreas; Bansmann, Martin; Nentwich, Karin; Müller, Patrick; Krug, Joachim; Roos, Markus; Halbfass, Phillip; Natale, Andrea; Gaita, Fiorenzo; Haines, David.

In: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.04.2015, p. 455-463.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deneke, T, Jais, P, Scaglione, M, Schmitt, R, Di Biase, L, Christopoulos, G, Schade, A, Mügge, A, Bansmann, M, Nentwich, K, Müller, P, Krug, J, Roos, M, Halbfass, P, Natale, A, Gaita, F & Haines, D 2015, 'Silent cerebral events/lesions related to atrial fibrillation ablation: A clinical review', Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 455-463. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12608
Deneke, Thomas ; Jais, Pierre ; Scaglione, Marco ; Schmitt, Rainer ; Di Biase, Luigi ; Christopoulos, Georgios ; Schade, Anja ; Mügge, Andreas ; Bansmann, Martin ; Nentwich, Karin ; Müller, Patrick ; Krug, Joachim ; Roos, Markus ; Halbfass, Phillip ; Natale, Andrea ; Gaita, Fiorenzo ; Haines, David. / Silent cerebral events/lesions related to atrial fibrillation ablation : A clinical review. In: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2015 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 455-463.
@article{a49ced328c80431da03e35782eaa7a8c,
title = "Silent cerebral events/lesions related to atrial fibrillation ablation: A clinical review",
abstract = "Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has identified a high incidence of cerebral ischemia in asymptomatic patients after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation (silent). Detection of cerebral ischemic events on MRI is based on acute hyperintense lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging. In the literature, the incidence is related to specifications of MRI and depends on the definition applied. In comparative studies, silent cerebral events (SCE, diffusion-weighted MRI [DWI] positive only) appear to be approximately 3 times more common compared to using a definition of silent cerebral lesions (SCL; without fluid attenuated inverse recovery sequence [FLAIR] positivity). Whereas the FLAIR sequence may turn positive within days after the ischemic event, SCE definition is highly sensitive for early phases of ischemic brain damage. SCE/SCL appear to represent cerebral ischemic infarcts and determine the {"}embolic fingerprint{"} of a specific ablation technology and strategy used. The optimum time point for detecting SCE is early after AF ablation (24-72 hours), whereas detection of SCL can only be performed within the first 2-7 days (due to delay of FLAIR positivity). Different technology-, procedure-, and patient-related parameters have been identified to play a role in the multifactorial genesis of SCE/SCL. In recent years, evidence has been gathered that there may be differences of SCE/SCL rates depending upon the ablation technology used, but small patient numbers and a large number of potential confounders hamper all studies. As major findings of recent studies, mode of periprocedural and intraprocedural anticoagulation has been identified as a major predictor for incidences of SCE/SCL. Whereas procedural characteristics related to higher SCE/SCL-rates may be modified, unchangeable patient-related factors should be taken into account for future individualized risk assessment. Novel ablation devices introduced into the market should be tested for their potential embolic fingerprint and refinements of ablation procedures to reduce their embolic potential should be prompted. The knowledge of {"}best practice{"} in terms of low SCE/SCL rates has prompted changes in work-flow, which have been implemented into ablation procedures using novel ablation devices. So far, no study has linked SCE/SCL to neuropsychological decline and the low number of AF-ablation-associated events needs to be weighted against the multitude of preexisting asymptomatic MRI-detected brain lesions related to the course of AF itself. Future studies are needed to evaluate if more white matter hyperintensities due to AF may be prevented by AF ablation (producing only a small number of SCE/SCL).",
keywords = "atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, cryoablation, silent cerebral infarction, stroke",
author = "Thomas Deneke and Pierre Jais and Marco Scaglione and Rainer Schmitt and {Di Biase}, Luigi and Georgios Christopoulos and Anja Schade and Andreas M{\"u}gge and Martin Bansmann and Karin Nentwich and Patrick M{\"u}ller and Joachim Krug and Markus Roos and Phillip Halbfass and Andrea Natale and Fiorenzo Gaita and David Haines",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jce.12608",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "455--463",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology",
issn = "1045-3873",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Silent cerebral events/lesions related to atrial fibrillation ablation

T2 - A clinical review

AU - Deneke, Thomas

AU - Jais, Pierre

AU - Scaglione, Marco

AU - Schmitt, Rainer

AU - Di Biase, Luigi

AU - Christopoulos, Georgios

AU - Schade, Anja

AU - Mügge, Andreas

AU - Bansmann, Martin

AU - Nentwich, Karin

AU - Müller, Patrick

AU - Krug, Joachim

AU - Roos, Markus

AU - Halbfass, Phillip

AU - Natale, Andrea

AU - Gaita, Fiorenzo

AU - Haines, David

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has identified a high incidence of cerebral ischemia in asymptomatic patients after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation (silent). Detection of cerebral ischemic events on MRI is based on acute hyperintense lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging. In the literature, the incidence is related to specifications of MRI and depends on the definition applied. In comparative studies, silent cerebral events (SCE, diffusion-weighted MRI [DWI] positive only) appear to be approximately 3 times more common compared to using a definition of silent cerebral lesions (SCL; without fluid attenuated inverse recovery sequence [FLAIR] positivity). Whereas the FLAIR sequence may turn positive within days after the ischemic event, SCE definition is highly sensitive for early phases of ischemic brain damage. SCE/SCL appear to represent cerebral ischemic infarcts and determine the "embolic fingerprint" of a specific ablation technology and strategy used. The optimum time point for detecting SCE is early after AF ablation (24-72 hours), whereas detection of SCL can only be performed within the first 2-7 days (due to delay of FLAIR positivity). Different technology-, procedure-, and patient-related parameters have been identified to play a role in the multifactorial genesis of SCE/SCL. In recent years, evidence has been gathered that there may be differences of SCE/SCL rates depending upon the ablation technology used, but small patient numbers and a large number of potential confounders hamper all studies. As major findings of recent studies, mode of periprocedural and intraprocedural anticoagulation has been identified as a major predictor for incidences of SCE/SCL. Whereas procedural characteristics related to higher SCE/SCL-rates may be modified, unchangeable patient-related factors should be taken into account for future individualized risk assessment. Novel ablation devices introduced into the market should be tested for their potential embolic fingerprint and refinements of ablation procedures to reduce their embolic potential should be prompted. The knowledge of "best practice" in terms of low SCE/SCL rates has prompted changes in work-flow, which have been implemented into ablation procedures using novel ablation devices. So far, no study has linked SCE/SCL to neuropsychological decline and the low number of AF-ablation-associated events needs to be weighted against the multitude of preexisting asymptomatic MRI-detected brain lesions related to the course of AF itself. Future studies are needed to evaluate if more white matter hyperintensities due to AF may be prevented by AF ablation (producing only a small number of SCE/SCL).

AB - Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has identified a high incidence of cerebral ischemia in asymptomatic patients after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation (silent). Detection of cerebral ischemic events on MRI is based on acute hyperintense lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging. In the literature, the incidence is related to specifications of MRI and depends on the definition applied. In comparative studies, silent cerebral events (SCE, diffusion-weighted MRI [DWI] positive only) appear to be approximately 3 times more common compared to using a definition of silent cerebral lesions (SCL; without fluid attenuated inverse recovery sequence [FLAIR] positivity). Whereas the FLAIR sequence may turn positive within days after the ischemic event, SCE definition is highly sensitive for early phases of ischemic brain damage. SCE/SCL appear to represent cerebral ischemic infarcts and determine the "embolic fingerprint" of a specific ablation technology and strategy used. The optimum time point for detecting SCE is early after AF ablation (24-72 hours), whereas detection of SCL can only be performed within the first 2-7 days (due to delay of FLAIR positivity). Different technology-, procedure-, and patient-related parameters have been identified to play a role in the multifactorial genesis of SCE/SCL. In recent years, evidence has been gathered that there may be differences of SCE/SCL rates depending upon the ablation technology used, but small patient numbers and a large number of potential confounders hamper all studies. As major findings of recent studies, mode of periprocedural and intraprocedural anticoagulation has been identified as a major predictor for incidences of SCE/SCL. Whereas procedural characteristics related to higher SCE/SCL-rates may be modified, unchangeable patient-related factors should be taken into account for future individualized risk assessment. Novel ablation devices introduced into the market should be tested for their potential embolic fingerprint and refinements of ablation procedures to reduce their embolic potential should be prompted. The knowledge of "best practice" in terms of low SCE/SCL rates has prompted changes in work-flow, which have been implemented into ablation procedures using novel ablation devices. So far, no study has linked SCE/SCL to neuropsychological decline and the low number of AF-ablation-associated events needs to be weighted against the multitude of preexisting asymptomatic MRI-detected brain lesions related to the course of AF itself. Future studies are needed to evaluate if more white matter hyperintensities due to AF may be prevented by AF ablation (producing only a small number of SCE/SCL).

KW - atrial fibrillation

KW - catheter ablation

KW - cryoablation

KW - silent cerebral infarction

KW - stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927692169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927692169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jce.12608

DO - 10.1111/jce.12608

M3 - Article

C2 - 25556518

AN - SCOPUS:84927692169

VL - 26

SP - 455

EP - 463

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

SN - 1045-3873

IS - 4

ER -