Setting boundaries: Brain dynamics of modal and amodal illusory shape completion in humans

Micah M. Murray, Deirdre M. Foxe, Daniel C. Javitt, John J. Foxe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

133 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Normal visual perception requires differentiating foreground from background objects. Differences in physical attributes sometimes determine this relationship. Often such differences must instead be inferred, as when two objects or their parts have the same luminance. Modal completion refers to such perceptual "filling-in" of object borders that are accompanied by concurrent brightness enhancement, in turn termed illusory contours (ICs). Amodal completion is filling-in without concurrent brightness enhancement. Presently there are controversies regarding whether both completion processes use a common neural mechanism and whether perceptual filling-in is a bottom-up, feedforward process initiating at the lowest levels of the cortical visual pathway or commences at higher-tier regions. We previously examined modal completion (Murray et al., 2002) and provided evidence that the earliest modal IC sensitivity occurs within higher-tier object recognition areas of the lateral occipital complex (LOC). We further proposed that previous observations of IC sensitivity in lower-tier regions likely reflect feedback modulation from the LOC. The present study tested these proposals, examining the commonality between modal and amodal completion mechanisms with high-density electrical mapping, spatiotemporal topographic analyses, and the local autoregressive average distributed linear inverse source estimation. A common initial mechanism for both types of completion processes (140 msec) that manifested as a modulation in response strength within higher-tier visual areas, including the LOC and parietal structures, is demonstrated, whereas differential mechanisms were evident only at a subsequent time period (240 msec), with amodal completion relying on continued strong responses in these structures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6898-6903
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume24
Issue number31
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 4 2004

Fingerprint

Spatio-Temporal Analysis
Visual Perception
Visual Pathways
Brain
Recognition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Binding
  • ERP
  • Event-related potential
  • Figure-ground segregation
  • Illusory contour
  • Source analysis
  • VEP
  • Visual evoked potential

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Setting boundaries : Brain dynamics of modal and amodal illusory shape completion in humans. / Murray, Micah M.; Foxe, Deirdre M.; Javitt, Daniel C.; Foxe, John J.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 24, No. 31, 04.08.2004, p. 6898-6903.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Murray, Micah M. ; Foxe, Deirdre M. ; Javitt, Daniel C. ; Foxe, John J. / Setting boundaries : Brain dynamics of modal and amodal illusory shape completion in humans. In: Journal of Neuroscience. 2004 ; Vol. 24, No. 31. pp. 6898-6903.
@article{da003607915a4213a9947ff47327b233,
title = "Setting boundaries: Brain dynamics of modal and amodal illusory shape completion in humans",
abstract = "Normal visual perception requires differentiating foreground from background objects. Differences in physical attributes sometimes determine this relationship. Often such differences must instead be inferred, as when two objects or their parts have the same luminance. Modal completion refers to such perceptual {"}filling-in{"} of object borders that are accompanied by concurrent brightness enhancement, in turn termed illusory contours (ICs). Amodal completion is filling-in without concurrent brightness enhancement. Presently there are controversies regarding whether both completion processes use a common neural mechanism and whether perceptual filling-in is a bottom-up, feedforward process initiating at the lowest levels of the cortical visual pathway or commences at higher-tier regions. We previously examined modal completion (Murray et al., 2002) and provided evidence that the earliest modal IC sensitivity occurs within higher-tier object recognition areas of the lateral occipital complex (LOC). We further proposed that previous observations of IC sensitivity in lower-tier regions likely reflect feedback modulation from the LOC. The present study tested these proposals, examining the commonality between modal and amodal completion mechanisms with high-density electrical mapping, spatiotemporal topographic analyses, and the local autoregressive average distributed linear inverse source estimation. A common initial mechanism for both types of completion processes (140 msec) that manifested as a modulation in response strength within higher-tier visual areas, including the LOC and parietal structures, is demonstrated, whereas differential mechanisms were evident only at a subsequent time period (240 msec), with amodal completion relying on continued strong responses in these structures.",
keywords = "Binding, ERP, Event-related potential, Figure-ground segregation, Illusory contour, Source analysis, VEP, Visual evoked potential",
author = "Murray, {Micah M.} and Foxe, {Deirdre M.} and Javitt, {Daniel C.} and Foxe, {John J.}",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1996-04.2004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "6898--6903",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "31",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Setting boundaries

T2 - Brain dynamics of modal and amodal illusory shape completion in humans

AU - Murray, Micah M.

AU - Foxe, Deirdre M.

AU - Javitt, Daniel C.

AU - Foxe, John J.

PY - 2004/8/4

Y1 - 2004/8/4

N2 - Normal visual perception requires differentiating foreground from background objects. Differences in physical attributes sometimes determine this relationship. Often such differences must instead be inferred, as when two objects or their parts have the same luminance. Modal completion refers to such perceptual "filling-in" of object borders that are accompanied by concurrent brightness enhancement, in turn termed illusory contours (ICs). Amodal completion is filling-in without concurrent brightness enhancement. Presently there are controversies regarding whether both completion processes use a common neural mechanism and whether perceptual filling-in is a bottom-up, feedforward process initiating at the lowest levels of the cortical visual pathway or commences at higher-tier regions. We previously examined modal completion (Murray et al., 2002) and provided evidence that the earliest modal IC sensitivity occurs within higher-tier object recognition areas of the lateral occipital complex (LOC). We further proposed that previous observations of IC sensitivity in lower-tier regions likely reflect feedback modulation from the LOC. The present study tested these proposals, examining the commonality between modal and amodal completion mechanisms with high-density electrical mapping, spatiotemporal topographic analyses, and the local autoregressive average distributed linear inverse source estimation. A common initial mechanism for both types of completion processes (140 msec) that manifested as a modulation in response strength within higher-tier visual areas, including the LOC and parietal structures, is demonstrated, whereas differential mechanisms were evident only at a subsequent time period (240 msec), with amodal completion relying on continued strong responses in these structures.

AB - Normal visual perception requires differentiating foreground from background objects. Differences in physical attributes sometimes determine this relationship. Often such differences must instead be inferred, as when two objects or their parts have the same luminance. Modal completion refers to such perceptual "filling-in" of object borders that are accompanied by concurrent brightness enhancement, in turn termed illusory contours (ICs). Amodal completion is filling-in without concurrent brightness enhancement. Presently there are controversies regarding whether both completion processes use a common neural mechanism and whether perceptual filling-in is a bottom-up, feedforward process initiating at the lowest levels of the cortical visual pathway or commences at higher-tier regions. We previously examined modal completion (Murray et al., 2002) and provided evidence that the earliest modal IC sensitivity occurs within higher-tier object recognition areas of the lateral occipital complex (LOC). We further proposed that previous observations of IC sensitivity in lower-tier regions likely reflect feedback modulation from the LOC. The present study tested these proposals, examining the commonality between modal and amodal completion mechanisms with high-density electrical mapping, spatiotemporal topographic analyses, and the local autoregressive average distributed linear inverse source estimation. A common initial mechanism for both types of completion processes (140 msec) that manifested as a modulation in response strength within higher-tier visual areas, including the LOC and parietal structures, is demonstrated, whereas differential mechanisms were evident only at a subsequent time period (240 msec), with amodal completion relying on continued strong responses in these structures.

KW - Binding

KW - ERP

KW - Event-related potential

KW - Figure-ground segregation

KW - Illusory contour

KW - Source analysis

KW - VEP

KW - Visual evoked potential

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3843089618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3843089618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1996-04.2004

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1996-04.2004

M3 - Article

C2 - 15295024

AN - SCOPUS:3843089618

VL - 24

SP - 6898

EP - 6903

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 31

ER -